My guess would be that it was a note on some form of digital media. Say you make a document on your computer that you later delete. The data doesn't actually get deleted, your computer just removes the location from it's giant table of contents and marks the space "available to write". Typically that information can still be retrieved using software tools until it is actually overwritten, and even then there are exceptions. So yes, it is entirely plausible for them to have forensic evidence of a note that someone attempted to destroy.
kieron115
joined 2 years ago
My banking apps, I don't feel comfortable spending money when I can't see my accounts in real time. Had a bad experience with BoA when I was younger.
Charlie Kirk is dead. Oh well.
That’s… not how it works. A law firm rep (usually) just has to connect to the swarm and see what IPs are there. It matters not if you share, being in the swarm is enough for them to send your ISP a notice of infringement. So as others said, use protection.
Who counts the bean counters?
Lies, I count way more than 15 beans!
It can't be any less scenic than the Four Seasons!
LOL I thought OP was just calling their location a dump bc they’re having a charlie memorial. Nope, turns out it’s literally at the landfill. Now I can’t tell if this is a joke or not.
That term isn’t really used anymore due to the stigma attached to it. Anti-social personality disorder is the term. It’s also clinically different from NPD.
wall pimple it is then
Maybe I should have left that out, that's just me analyzing it too much. But lets say you shred a document. You would probably say that you've destroyed that document. If someone then took the pieces from the trash and painstakingly put them back together into a readable document, did you still destroy it? Or did you attempt to destroy it?