MrVilliam

joined 7 months ago
[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)

People claim to support the Constitution and then say dumb shit like this. Try reading it. It's not very long. It very clearly spells out that everybody in the country has rights, and that one of this rights is the right to peacefully protest. You're even exercising that same right by arguing that they shouldn't have these rights. But they do. And the second you try to take that away from them, what's to stop a dictator on the other side from deciding that you don't deserve the right to disagree with your government anymore, and so cops will be authorized to break into your home and kidnap you and deport you to a country you've never been to.

Any argument you have about how that isn't the same thing is just going to cement how xenophobic and racist you are, so instead of bothering to reply, just sit with your thoughts and figure out what you can do differently moving forward to develop some amount of empathy and critical thinking skills to not advocate for things to get shitty for everybody in the long term. It's possible to grow and improve, and I'm rooting for you.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 39 points 3 months ago (11 children)

What's crazier is that you think that legal residents don't deserve a first amendment right despite doing so much more to have earned rights than any person who just happened to have been born here did. Fuck outta here with that shitty-ass take. All rights for all Americans, full stop.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 106 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Unless 76% of Republicans makes up 18% of Americans, they got some 'splainin' to do.

"Presidents should obey court orders. But not my president, and not those court orders!"

Guys, what the fuck did you think was being discussed?

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

Dude, you're gonna get disappeared for typing r@!nb0w5 out where children could conceivably read it, assuming they are allowed to learn how to read in the first place still.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Ahead of its time, predicting the consequences of tariffs like that.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 46 points 3 months ago

And they're terrified of all the childless cat ladies opting to not produce their next generation of laborer/consumer brood to be said replacement. Hence the crackdown on abortions and contraception and people who pair up in ways that cannot yield children. You can't have the infinite growth that capitalism demands if the number of producers and consumers goes down.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Combined cycle natural gas plant operator in the US here. Bridging the gap between low demand and high demand times is a big part of why it's so challenging to try to reduce fossil fuel power solutions. The grid is basically a pressurized pipeline, and it's only reliable if that pressure is maintained no matter how many "faucets" get opened or closed. Green energy solutions aren't really able to raise that "pressure" unless we build significantly more than we need and keep a bunch of them off most of the time until peak conditions demand them. Nuclear is extremely slow (relatively speaking) to (safely) alter output to meet demand, so its best usecase is for baseloading as much as possible. But with a natural gas plant, I can put my foot on the gas pedal, figuratively speaking. It's fucking terrible for the environment, but that's the cost of everybody insisting on consuming so much goddamn electricity all the time. If you don't like it, stop supporting power hogs like data centers by using AI bullshit and cloud storage and web hosting and media streaming.

This is a complicated problem, and complicated problems almost never have simple solutions. I wish we could minimize the problem of what happens when 100M+ EVs get plugged in at 7pm on a Tuesday by already having put together a strong public transportation infrastructure that people feel comfortable and safe using, but the time to start doing that was probably during the gas shortage in the 70s when we saw how overly reliant we were on cars. It's probably not too late to start, but it's gonna be a challenging transition now no matter what we do.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

So it'll be the sharpie then.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

They're on board with it because they think it will only happen to "those people" and will be appalled when it happens to themselves or at least their neighbors and friends and families.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

And as we all know, planes can't turn around. Too bad those Wright brothers couldn't figure that little maneuver out. And it's made air combat in wars very complicated and pointless since planes can't just turn around and get back to where they took off from.

/s

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I thought authoritarianism was supposed to at least make the trains run on time. Or maybe the dictator will just edit train schedules with his sharpie if anybody dares to ask.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

there's always one when you need to cross the tracks.

This, but you ever notice that it's pretty much never passenger trains? This efficient mode of transportation is largely designed for and used by industry rather than for travel or commute. The exception is within big enough cities like DC and NYC to get from one side of the city to the other or anywhere between. Sure there are some trains that go between cities, but they're largely unreliable because passenger cars yield to industrial freight, and so people are less inclined to opt for them over planes or cars, and so there are fewer trains available to go wherever you're going in the window you're trying to go. So you book a flight instead.

I'd take a long train ride over a road trip any fucking day. I don't understand anybody who would rather drive than chill and read a book or play games or watch movies or nap.

view more: ‹ prev next ›