this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
121 points (99.2% liked)

News

33815 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

United States is offering Ukraine security guarantees for a period of 15 years as part of a proposed peace plan, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Monday, though he said he would prefer an American commitment of up to 50 years to deter Russia from further attempts to seize its neighbor’s land by force.

Donald Trump hosted Zelenskyy at his Florida resort on Sunday and insisted that Ukraine and Russia are “closer than ever before” to a peace settlement.

Negotiators are still searching for a breakthrough on key issues, however, including whose forces withdraw from where and the fate of the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, one of the 10 biggest in the world. Trump noted that the monthslong U.S.-led negotiations could still collapse.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ukraine gave up their nukes 30 some years ago after US and Russia agreed to both protect their security....

So this "security" promise is pretty hollow

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They promised to not attack them, not to defend them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Clearly Russia broke that agreement, but the US, UK, France, and China haven't.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Proving yourself wrong with your own source.

"1. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used. "

To date, NONE of the signatories of the Budapest Memorandum have ever requested an Article 4 session in support of Ukraine.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago
  1. Russia has veto power on the security council, so there's really no point
  2. Nukes haven't been used
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

It also bars economic coercion....

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's also been a "ceasefire" in Gaza for over 2 months.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago

Trump got a soccer trophy for that. Goooooooooool! Gooolazo!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago

One side isn't fighting.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If I can see it would be useless, certainly all of Ukraine can, too.

The U.S. will not go to war against Russia when they invade again. Everyone knows that. Only NATO has a chance of actually helping protect Ukraine from the next invasion.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup

Russia has said it won’t accept the deployment in Ukraine of troops from NATO countries.

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This includes the US. Basically, Russia is saying no one is allowed to actaully provide security for Ukraine, regardless of whatever paper promises are made.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Ukraine gave up their nukes 30 some years ago after US and Russia agreed to both protect their security....

So this "security" promise is pretty hollow

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

In situations like this, a punt can be the best plan.

Take a deal you know won't last, in the hopes before it falls apart you can join NATO/EU along with getting one on one treaties with a bunch of powerful countries who would be willing to join up.

It's hard to get that stuff signed when actively being invaded, because it immediately activates.

But even a single day pause is enough for other governments to get on board.

Source: Crusader Kings

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 8 points 23 hours ago

Also, they already have a guarantee of protection from us that we're blatantly ignoring.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, Trump won't be alive next time Russia will invade them again.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If Russia actually waits 15 years. Or actually stops at all.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Russia might only have to wait 15 days. I hear our dear leaders brain is dieing

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That either means the war just goes on a while as is and/or that Trump dies soon. Not sure I trust either one.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 48 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How is that different from the security guarantee we are already ignoring?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Have you considered that this one might have the word "bigly" in it somewhere?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

There is no guarantee with trump in involved. The mans word is worthless.

[–] Blade9732@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly one year from now: " This was a bad deal, put in place by Biden and we just have to get it changed. See, the nucular is the problem and Obama knew my uncle ar MIT, so we can fix this deal that Biden created. I have told Putin to not invade while we pull all our troops and funding out to make sure that Biden's terrible deal gets fixed in two weeks. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! "

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you think it'll take that long?

[–] Blade9732@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Because Russia needs the year off to rebuild weapons and a functional army, well as functional as vodka and corruption can do.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Pooters can always advertise for more American evangelicals to move there. "3000 rubles bonus if you bring your teenage sons!"

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 25 points 16 hours ago

And we all know what Trump's word is worth.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Didn’t they already have a security guarantee from the United States when they gave up their nukes?

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

...because we upheld the terms of the Budapest Memorandum so faithfully?

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

You can trust the American government, just ask any Native American. All of our treaties are still upheld…and strong…and *shot in the back.

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

A 10,000 year guarantee would have just as much weight

[–] QProphecy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Don't trust them!

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago

They had a security agreement with Russia that said Russia would never attack if Ukraine handed over their nuclear arsenal. And we are where we are today because of that.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Pinky promise?