this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
382 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

77870 readers
4026 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 154 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Since day one, we have stood with the artist community against piracy, and we are actively working with our industry partners to protect creators and defend their rights.

Lmao. They protect and defend artist rights so hard they they've refused to pay a fair compensation, and have taken it further by promoting AI artists over actual artists. This statement is almost comical after it was reported that they've had copy cats to replace King Glizard and the Lizard Wizard when they pulled their albums from Spotify

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 4 points 11 hours ago

It have never been a fight against privacy, it's a fight against freedom

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

If you use Spotify to listen to artists, you certainly don't actually respect them. Fuck you people who give money to Spotify.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 46 points 11 hours ago
[–] dusty_raven@discuss.online 35 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I thought it was gonna be some no-name group that was gonna hold it ransom etc. But it's actually by Anna's-archive. I don't really condone piracy (pay the people who make art, and those who make it accessible), but if anyone was going to do it, I'm glad it's them.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 19 points 12 hours ago

I don’t support piracy either. I just torrent it for free. 🏴‍☠️

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

These millions of audio files have done nothing wrong. Keeping them locked away is scandalous. Release them immediately !
/dad joke, sorry

[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 5 points 11 hours ago

How dare they, someone should call, PETM. People for the ethical treatment of music. Those poor songs locked up all day.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I dare to wage that the top 1000 most popular artists entire body of work is already freely available in torrent form. The remainder of artists will benefit from an independent archival point of view.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Spotify absolutely deserves to be singled out for its exploitative practices, especially since this company is largely responsible for musicians not being paid fairly for their hard work. It's just a shame that there's hardly anything to steal here other than people's hard work, to which Spotify has contributed nothing - but that applies to all companies that are successful on the internet today. Without exception, all of these companies are built on the same platform logic: the content that these companies exploit is paid for with starvation wages, if at all (not at all in the case of LLMs).

Therefore, I cannot see anything positive in this because it does not change the underlying problem in the slightest.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The major labels are still the biggest evil

Spotify & Co. make advance payments to the labels to be allowed to use their music catalogues. These advance payments are then recouped with the streaming revenues. However, if the revenue is less than the advance, the difference remains with the labels as “breakage”. If a streaming service pays a label US $1 million as an advance for the contract period, but the label’s catalogue is only streamed to the value of US $750,000, then the label has US $250,000 in additional revenue that does not have to be distributed to the artists.

https://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2024/10/14/the-music-streaming-economy-part-18-breakage-in-the-digital-age/?hl=en-US#%3A%7E%3Atext=It+is+revenue+that+cannot%2C5%5D

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Nevertheless, Spotify makes more profit than any music label, even more than all the remaining music labels combined. This is how it works today: music, literature, journalism, and art no longer exist according to this logic - only content. And as disrespectful as the term sounds, that's how it's paid for - with scrabs because that's the business model.

Your pirate approach is no longer up to date, because it is no longer directed against large corporations, but robs artists of the little they have left. This will only accelerate the trend: no one will try to make a living from art anymore. If you think that people will do it anyway because they want to express themselves, I think you are absolutely wrong.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It makes more profits but not revenus

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Market cap and profits are different metrics. At the end of the day major labels dictate streaming services policies . Considering that they own 80% of all music

Making a Scene Presents How Universal Music Group and Spotify Rewrote the Rules—At the Expense of Indie Artists

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's not accelerating the trend one bit by opening it to everyone. Music labels and Spotify don't plan on putting a stop to AI, they want to own it. The artists lost decades ago and siding with copyright juggernauts doesn't help anyone but the copyright juggernauts.

[–] Kben@lemmy.zip 23 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Lars Ulrich is raging,he's gonna sue.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

gonna have to wait an extra 2 months to get that gold plated shark tank.

[–] sgtpugg@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The sharks are gonna be so bummed, I know they had their hearts set on it.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago

Just remember to try really hard to not to seed it and say it's training data... And it's fair use.

[–] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I’m an artist with music on Spotify. I honestly don’t know how I feel about this.

I know Metallica got a lot of shit about Napster back in the day, but I can’t help but feel like they were right. They were (by my recollection) trying to ensure artists still have a claim to their body of work. I know the industry has come so far since then, but it feels like the moment everything started to slowly become “content” and not art.

I just want real people to actually enjoy my music. I don’t expect to make a living or even real money off my music, but I also don’t like someone else making money off my art and using it to train AI models.

I made something meaningful, no one else gets to decide that they wanna commodify it or use it to make slop.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

Anything you post online should be considered permanently online. It’s really outdated to think exclusive ownership is possible online. The way I think about it is that anything I put online is for everyone, good or bad, and not for profit.

This was done by an archival group, primarily for the purposes of preservation. Don't know if it helps make you feel better, but at least personally I think complete archives of human cultural output, if possible, are important. So much has already been lost over the course of history

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 hours ago

Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start

Hahahaha

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 13 points 13 hours ago

"... Found to be 48% AI Slop"

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 9 points 13 hours ago

I hope musicbrainz hops on the metadata list

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I used some software to download music from them and they locked me out of my account for violating their ToS.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

No, they just released metadata as the first batch. The rest will follow.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago