this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
888 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77974 readers
2433 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am standing on the corner of Harris Road and Young Street outside of the Crossroads Business Park in Bakersfield, California, looking up at a Flock surveillance camera bolted high above a traffic signal. On my phone, I am watching myself in real time as the camera records and livestreams me—without any password or login—to the open internet. I wander into the intersection, stare at the camera and wave. On the livestream, I can see myself clearly. Hundreds of miles away, my colleagues are remotely watching me too through the exposed feed.

Flock left livestreams and administrator control panels for at least 60 of its AI-enabled Condor cameras around the country exposed to the open internet, where anyone could watch them, download 30 days worth of video archive, and change settings, see log files, and run diagnostics.

Archive: http://archive.today/IWMKe

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 161 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 190 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Or like someone in Hacker News comm suggested, use this to track a US Senator for 24 hours, make it all public, then see if they're still OK with this...

[–] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 121 points 4 days ago

They'll just make it illegal for just them. Like the Internet privacy

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (6 children)

That's the first I've seen a HN web client. Why does it exist, and what's the reason against linking directly to Y Combinator?

Peter Thiel invested in Flock through Y Combinator

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago

YCombinator is a VC fund trying to pretend like they're hacker(tinkering) friendly community, when their business model is boosting their own companies/startups. And companies aren't hitting those profits with people tinkering.

https://soatok.blog/2025/12/17/the-revolution-will-not-make-the-hacker-news-front-page/

In all, that doesn't align with the hacker ethos. They're just capitalizing on what it stands for with a lot of techbro hubris.

The first step of limiting their influence is using a different opensource frontend.

https://github.com/rajatkulkarni95/hckrnws

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 days ago

This is the way.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 105 points 4 days ago

I do not consent.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 87 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The original is better because no higher resolution version actually looks like the original. It's so weird, it's not hars at all to make a higher res one that's almost identical to the original yet all the ones I've seen just look like shit. I'm gonna take some time tomorrow and make a high resolution version with the details correct.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The high res one looks better as a cutout instead of the full background, but the jpeg adds to the charm IMHO.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

The high-res one also removes all the shadows, I assume the upscaling algorithm believed they were blur

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I swear to God if this is AI upscaled

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 52 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Again? How insecure are these things? I am honestly wondering how easy it would be to get into one and shut down the entire system.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's obvious that these guys are fucking amateur hour Techbros, running this shitshow as they have. I don't doubt they're underpaying and undertraining the contractors they hire to install these things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 48 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Benn Jordan did a recent video on his...explorations of Flock cameras. Essentially, they're easily hackable and really should be an urgent matter of national security.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Dude, he just released another one where they accessed dozens of real, currently in use cameras. They didn't even "hack" them, they just used a search engine to find publicly exposed cameras, opened their unsecured internal web panel, and could download and view any footage over the past 31 days, including from the new face tracking cameras that zoom in and pan on people's unsuspecting faces as they walk by.

Truly wild.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reading flock their own response about their security and recording it via one of their active and installed cameras was fucking great. I mean, it was nightmare shit, but at a certain point, you have to appreciate the irony.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

My own mother (pensioner) sent me the video asking "is this real?" But could only follow the first minutes of it.

I lol'd at that part and had to explain the brilliance of it. Then she lol'd, too.

It's nice to share in the shadows humor, as a family, while we feel our liberties erode.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was living in a 10th story penthouse apartment as a new building started beside us. The contractor put a webcam high up on the structure so people could watch construction live on a website. They left the control panel fully exposed so all you had to do was find the IP address of the camera and boom, you had full control. I would point it directly at my apartment's window and wave, or my friends would do silly shit. Every morning the cam would be reset, but they never actually secured it. That's when I realized how fucked we were, 20 years ago.

[–] LunaChocken@programming.dev 16 points 3 days ago

I wouldn't be surprised if it got found by Shodan, which scans the entire internet, indexes it and is easily searchable.

There's actually quite a few open webcams on the internet that shouldn't be.

https://github.com/00xNetrunner/Shodan_Cheet-Sheet

[–] baller_w@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

He co-released a video with 404Media on this new dystopian finding today as well.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

A city in the KC Metro just signed a contract with Flock for drone cameras. Fuck that Big Brother bullshit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I seem to recall an early 00s screed, perhaps by Bruce Schneier or someone of that ilk, suggesting a future in which yes we have surveillance in the public square, but since it's public, everyone has full access to all the public-place cameras at any time. So you could use it to, say, see around the corner of an alley at night.

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

That was David Brin in The Transparent Society. He has continued to riff on the theme periodically since then.

[–] jmsy@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Snip their wires, spray paint their lens, or put a hammer on the end of a tall stick. it should be easy to take these things out. Of course don't do anything or have anything on you that would identify you were in the area at the time of these actions.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Air rifles are pretty cheap too if you can shoot straight.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

There is now enough adjacent cctv coverage to follow your approach and exit from the scene of the crime. The rush is that another Flock camera is used to identify, and then make an example out of you or me.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Honestly? Good. These cameras should either be public or dismantled. I'd like to see them dismantled, but worst case scenario is the current one where they're selectively used by law enforcement

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

iirc they weren't even the first ones to discover this because there was already someone on the blackmarket selling data collected from exposed cameras and endpoints which included PII of entire police departments.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there a directory of these cameras? Or are they gonna make me do all the legwork?

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These specifically or just Flock cams?

Here's a start: DeFlock Me

[–] modus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I meant the unlocked interfaces. I'm familiar with deflock.me and have contributed to it. But thank you.

load more comments
view more: next ›