this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
247 points (94.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40328 readers
1396 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a 16-year-old son. I'm in my early 30s (had him very young) and a professional footballer. My son also dreams of becoming a successful footballer (he's been playing since he was 6), but he's just... not great. He's good, but not great - and in this extremely competitive industry you need to be at least great in order to even stand a chance. So I told him, as someone who's been doing this for a very, very long time & is active in this sphere, that he should find another, more attainable dream. He took it as me not believing in him, but I'm just objective and realistic.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let him try to aim for it..... As long as he doesn't neglect his education and other opportunities then there's no harm in giving him some years to figure this out himself the hard way.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

If your asking, you probably already know the answer.

Maybe you could have said something like "A top player needs to know math, because they've got to do a lot of investing. they should have otehr languages, because they'll be playing all over the world. Science and computers because..."

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

You need to have a sit down with him. He's 16 so he should be able to be take in whatever you'll say. Don't degrade him, don't talk down to him or anything.

But tell him that he has a future ahead of him, whatever it is but futures also have different pathways to choose from. The wrong futures are the kind of futures where no matter how much devotion, ambition and time spent it is to drive towards a particular future, it isn't that path. And that's okay because the world isn't over for him yet. The only thing your son is going to regret the most, is not trying more things while he has the youth and the time to do so.

That is key, is to try many things and see what really sticks.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You should support your kid, even if you're not convinced of his chances of making it. Anything else is just going to permanently damage your relationship. The best you can do is make sure he has a plan B. If he's good in school he's well on his way to that, so not much to worry about.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

He's here, he's there, he's every-fucking-where, Roy Kent!

[–] wazzup@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

Same scenario with my son years back. He loved basketball and his skinny, 5ft 8" body was not going to propell him to NBA stardom. My wife accused me of crushing my son's spirits. I never discouraged him from the sport and went to every high school and travel ball ($$$) game where he mostly sat on the bench. He's in his 30s now and planning a family, so the dreams are different. I don't think I did any lasting damage.

But, would I do it the same way again? It's nuanced to be sure. We want our children to be prepared for their futures and excel, not wash out. What I would do is look for ways to help him discover, on his own, where his real talent lies and comes to the realization himself.l and be there to soften the blow to that dream. Then, if his passion is still football, help him discover all the different career options are available, on and off the field, that can keep him close to his passion.

I hope this helps. If you're asking, you're likely a better dad that many out there.

Oh, and his mother is a c#$t and I divorced her shitty ass. ;)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

He'll either come to realize the truth on his own, or prove you wrong. Either way, you should support him.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You're literally a professional and your first thought isn't to use your own skills to coach him to get better?

All industries that pay well are competitive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps an unpopular opinion: no, you’re not a jerk for doing this. Steering our children onto a realistic path of reasonable success and happiness is part of our job as parents. We should pursue this gently, but it mustn’t be avoided. Parenting is hard. We won’t always get it right.

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Being objective and realistic = Not believing in him Why can't you be objective and realistic about your childs feelings, obviously, even if you are right and he's no good (which I doubt if you are saying it), you could have just made the statistical argument, "Son, while football is your dream, the chances of being sustained by it are small and you need a reliable way to survive in the world." Anything other than telling him YOU dont think HE can do it, and if you can't accept that, then you need to put aside your ego and seek professional expertise.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe if he had someone coach him decently while he was growing up

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›