this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
416 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
3596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.

Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

-_-

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 416 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dimjim@sh.itjust.works 92 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is such a fantastic way to put it. I fuckin love the internet, people have amazing ways to say things lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 168 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like mozilla could switch to making all their decisions by flipping a coin and do better than they're doing in recent years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 80 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Man, I so wish mozilla was a worker owned cooperative. These string of useless CEOs would have already been shown the door

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 72 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Is "must make the dumbest fucking decision possible at all times" in the Mozilla CEO job description or something?

I have no CEO experience, but I'll make stupid fucking decisions for a fifth of the salary you're paying the current guy.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago

The job of a CEO is to make the line go up, and that almost always comes at the expense of the consumer and the quality of the product itself.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 61 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (25 children)

Their user base is almost exclusively tech savvy people, the same people who are most opposed to AI.

I think this move signals that they believe we have nowhere else to go, and they're daring us to go fuck ourselves, because fuck you, what are you going to do, use Chrome?

Yes, yes I will, well Chromium forks.

In general, I prefer the look and feel of chromium-based browsers, but I use Firefox and Firefox forks for the reasons that I'm sure everyone here is aware of.

If those reasons go away, I'll just switch to Vivaldi as my primary browser. I won't be happy about it, but if Firefox becomes another AI slop project. I might as well go with the browser whose UX I prefer.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 30 points 10 hours ago

Yes, yes I will, well Chromium forks.

Yeah, I'm not going to switch to a Manifest V3 browser because Firefox puts in access to an optional AI agent. If Firefox makes it so you can't turn it off, which I wouldn't think is likely, I might switch to something like Librewolf, but Chromium? No.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 12 hours ago

I would use a Firefox fork over Vivaldi simfly because of extensions (including uBO)

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 11 hours ago

Vivaldi is like the only tech company in the world that has come out and stated definitively "we will not use AI".

[–] VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu 10 points 12 hours ago

Just like everything in North America it's about aquisition not retention.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 51 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Mozilla’s new CEO is a dumbass.

It's hard to beat the last one, but he somehow managed to pull it off.

Then again, Mitchell Baker is still on the board of directors if I'm not mistaken, so it sounds like the rot is too pervasive for just one CEO to change.

[–] oplkill@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

Just replace it by ai

[–] trk@aussie.zone 49 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've cancelled my monthly donation to Mozilla. What's the point. Every bit of feedback I've provided is to the tune of no goddamn AI, spend my money towards keeping up with the alternatives to make sure there's always an extra player in the field. Instead it's going to some overpaid dickhead who's going to introduce AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 49 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is every Mozilla CEO in the last decade:

collapsed inline media

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 48 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

“What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.” Some will be open-source models available to anyone.

This is such an out of touch non-answer here.

People don’t oppose ai changes because they’re locked into a model. In fact most AI products I use for my job let you choose a fucking model.

People hate them because

A) 90% of the time they’re useless and the remaining 10 are detrimental to the product experience

B) Ethical concerns about training off of artists and authors as well as environmental impact. EDIT: or also the general trend of trying to replace humans with AI.

C) Not wanting to play into the fucking arms race the billionaire class are manufacturing

D) The time they could be useful they have a risk of being either hilariously wrong or dangerously wrong. And there’s no amount of training and GPU manufacturing that’s gonna fix that.

Absolutely none of this is addressed by the CEO. I’m sure he has to say this because of the fucking tulip crazy money is in around this but it doesn’t make it any less tone deaf or futile.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 42 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

EU here is your chance! Fully fund Mozilla on the condition that they move to an EU country

[–] Brum@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

This. There is so much Mozilla and EU can offer each other.

[–] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 hours ago

And fire the CEO :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 39 points 15 hours ago (18 children)

Any valid alternative for android phones to firefox with same add-on support? These idiots look like they are speedrunning it to become a shitty company.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago

Fennec on fdroid perhaps?

[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 18 points 14 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 37 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

Is there like a petition or something we can all sign to show that literally no cunt wants this?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago

Some of Mozilla's AI integrations have been amazing, despite the community crying about it. Like private, offline translation (I don't care what anybody says, this is much better than sending the contents of your web page to a proprietary Google Translate server), and enhanced screen reader functionality.

But this one puzzles me. They're not being very descriptive, but it seems like it's just integrating generic LLM stuff? Not really what I'm after personally. At least it's opt-in, I guess.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 31 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Just like I said in another post related to this, I hope this doesn't kill LibreWolf, IceCat, and Waterfox.

[–] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 38 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Librewolf have put a post out a few days ago that they won’t add any AI stuff.

https://chaos.social/@librewolf/115716906957137196

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Waterfox is on the same page. As long as the browser doesn't outright require it to functio0n, I think the privacy-focused forks will remain. Of course, it's extra work to maintain divergent code, but this is worth it, IMO.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So many people mentioning (inferior, in my opinion) Firefox alternatives in the comments and nobody's mentioned Librewolf? Really? Maybe Librewolf will have to become a hard fork someday if this continues, but for now, it's just Firefox for people who care about their data. Aside from a few justifiably aggressive default settings, I've never had even a hint of an issue with it.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Librewolf's automatic cap at 60hz (anti-fingerprinting measure, I know, but annoying AF), and elements that break websites usually are the parts that turn people away. I'd rather use something like IronFox or Waterfox instead and just customize them.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Not sure how that's any different than disabling anti-fingerprinting in Librewolf. It's literally one switch.

To me, the value is in the assurance that Librewolf is never going to follow any of these kind of stupid trends, the way it demonstrates they're actually putting me first, not major websites nor themselves. It's not about their features or configuration out of the box, it's more about their demonstrated priorities and decision making process that gives me confidence.

I'm not so familiar with IronFox, maybe I should check it out too, but I do know Waterfox has made a number of... questionable decisions in the past. It was literally owned by an advertising company (System1) for awhile, which was very alarming.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago

waterfox, pale moon, ironfox. there's your multiple models.

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago

It's almost as if they are out of touch with their users. I don't get it. CEOs are just normal people like us.

/s

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

good fucking god, why does it have to be this way ? do I have to program my own browser now ? is that what they want ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] super_user_do@feddit.it 15 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Once I saw AI being integrated into Firefox, my trust towards the Mozilla Foundation dropped permanently. I have now switched over to Vivaldi which is an amazing European browser that kinda mimics Opera in many ways (but without the spyware ofc)

[–] TedZanzibar@feddit.uk 28 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Vivaldi is Chromium based, that's like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire.

There are plenty of Firefox forks that will be actively removing the AI crap. Waterfox, Pale Moon, Librewolf, Zen, Floorp to name a few. And these will all continue to support Manifest v2 and therefore adblockers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Web_browsers_based_on_Firefox

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Do you trust Vivaldi despite it beeing closed source? I get that you mistrust Mozilla since they integrated AI but there are plenty of forks that cut the AI part and even are explicitly privacy focused.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (6 children)

Ive been wary if firefox since wheneved it was they decided it was okay to shove "pocket" into the browser. These days i dont see mozilla as anything other than anti monopoly insurance for google, which they obviously dont need anymore.

Mozilla as a company has just been a decade of one poor decision after another adding more bloat and doing nothing meaningful to counter chromes near monopoly.

Vivaldi isnt perfect and brave has its baggage, but at least they actually include adblocking out of the box, a feature that just about everyone wants. Sure its easy enough to install an addon to firefox for it but the fact that you even have to do that should tell you everything you need to know about who mozilla is actually working for.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 14 points 9 hours ago
[–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

🤷‍♂️ ironfox exists

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Mozilla has had decades to find a sustainable business structure that aligns with the values of its contributors and users, yet here we are...

load more comments (1 replies)

I was having issues with Librewolf on a work computer a few weeks ago, so I decided to try Firefox to see if it was LW's security settings.

Holy shit, what a fucking trainwreck Firefox has become! It's so bad that I can't honestly recommend anyone use it anymore. The first time I started it, I saw all kinds of ads and trashy "news" articles that had no relevance to me whatsoever. Plus I had to reinstall all my extensions because they weren't signed and there's no way to disable that requirement. I was so horrified and offended, I just dumped it immediately and tried Chrome instead. What difference is there at this point?

It's just insulting at this point. I understand that they trying to find new revenue sources, and things are still better today than they were with Mitchell Baker as CEO, but it's still horrific how poorly Mozilla is being run. I'm so grateful we still have usable forks from the amazing people running projects like Librewolf. Without them, the web would just be flat out unusable.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 hours ago

Of course, this is just what Firefox needs ~~fixing long standing issues, catching up to web standards, process isolation on mobile~~ AI!

[–] drath@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

As per usual, Google's funding selects the music, and the music is to sink Firefox down even further.

load more comments
view more: next ›