this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
446 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
3684 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.

Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

-_-

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Ive been wary if firefox since wheneved it was they decided it was okay to shove "pocket" into the browser. These days i dont see mozilla as anything other than anti monopoly insurance for google, which they obviously dont need anymore.

Mozilla as a company has just been a decade of one poor decision after another adding more bloat and doing nothing meaningful to counter chromes near monopoly.

Vivaldi isnt perfect and brave has its baggage, but at least they actually include adblocking out of the box, a feature that just about everyone wants. Sure its easy enough to install an addon to firefox for it but the fact that you even have to do that should tell you everything you need to know about who mozilla is actually working for.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip -4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Abandoned FF in 2021 and went on Brave because fuck Mozilla. No regrets. Vivaldi is cool as well, but I think that the adblocker is a bit weaker. I'd switch to it otherwise.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Out of the frying pan, into the Brave fire. You might want to look at the controversy around Brave, if you haven't.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago

Brave works fine for me and that's all it matters. I don't care about made up "controversies" of and internet drama. As if Mozilla didn't fuck It up several times along it's miserable history.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

if you go into settings, you can manage sources and add additional filterlists.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

I know. Still, it has a bit less flexibility isolation than Brave (fingerprint protection, ephemeral storage and so on).

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 0 points 14 hours ago

I know. Still, it has a bit less flexibility isolation than Brave (fingerprint protection, ephemeral storage and so on).