this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
784 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

17697 readers
1414 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 125 points 2 days ago

What we aren't seeing is the scraps that didn't make it into the cookie cutter

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

just armor the whole plane dammit they're already heavier than air!

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Actually, it turns out the best strategy is to strip the plane's armor - light planes need less fuel, which makes them even lighter, and that makes them faster. Fast planes spend less time in enemy airspace, on top of being harder to hit.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The survivability onion: 1 don't get seen, 2 don't get hit, 3 don't get damaged, 4 don't get killed

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You forgot zero: don't be there.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The principles are usually about the machine itself, rather than overall war strategy, but sure, if you can do something without risking stuff and people, that's better.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, you could argue that "spend less time in enemy territory" counts for this.

[–] xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Or: Desert?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the tactic my goth girlfriend employees. It has its downsides.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Aw fuck I just realized I'm my wife's goth girlfriend I feel so fetishized

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

also... the Mossie used less critical resources which meant they could build more of them. and the plywood construction may have been harder to spot on radar.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Here's my strategic assessment: the best option is to large scale infiltrate your enemy before air raids and let the infiltrators put potatos into the air defence systems barrel's. 🥔 gg, ez.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or make the whole thing out of whatever the black box recorder is made of. Problem solved!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i read in a science article that they're made of this weird thing called atoms. can we put some of those in planes?

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just slice thinner

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's exactly why birds evolved to have scales!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

But...ohhhh...

spinlaunch and Longshot Space seem to have some ideas in that regard

I'm glad they armored the parts that made it back with sprinkles.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

Goes great with the Sadam Hussein hiding spot cookies

[–] NichtElias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

The ones with the sprinkles on the engines and cockpit must be extra tasty

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Age of Oddish with a Piplup profile pic. Yeah, I'd trust them.