1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
The thing that’s helped pull people back from AI dependency at work has been to frequently ask “how much time did AI save on the whole thing?”
I mean, ChatGPT is amazing at writing bash scripts. But if you spend 40 minutes iterating over a solution before the clanker gives a usable solution, didn’t AI just cost time?
People refuse to accept they aren’t gaining anything from AI until they repeatedly look at the big picture.
I once tried to use AI to automate a simple task and then i used a simple day to fail to automate that task and did the work by hand. How does anyone think this is "The future"???
Maybe you could ask him to measure how effective it is, by doing some tasks with ai and without, and measuring the time. If you want to make it non judgmental you could say it'd be helpful for you to hear if it's really worth the effort of trying some ai yourself. And then if he sees that it doesn't end up saving (and sometimes costs) him time, he might accept it.
If your friend doesn't see the correlation between what you wrote in your last paragraph and the irony of it, then I think he may be lacking some comprehensive skills altogether. So no doubt he makes up for it with AI which in return just makes him more numb.
Yea, it has to do with this line of thinking of "AI is a tool, I am using it as a tool, nothing else, I do not depend of it, is a tool", what impresses me, because they talk like if it were a drug or something.
In IT, you see people do things the hard way so often because it's what they know and figured out, and changing over to an easy way requires them to relearn and change their workflow, which they just don't see the point in.
You've already suggested to them there's a better and easier way to do what they need with existing tools instead of AI and they've turned it down - I would say leave it there. Something something leading horses to waters.
How about you just let him use the tools he wants? It's not that deep.
I dont want to be that guy, but the magic wand in photoshop has also lowered the skill. Its skills fade all the way to the top, yet we keep getting better results.
In comparison with AI, the magic wand does the job better and faster. You can tweak the tool to do a better job while the AI try to do what it thinks you want.
