Acamon

I guess it depends how niche vs on-topic the post is for the community you're posting in. But in general, I don't think I'm going to bothered by seeing the same issue coming up every few months. And if you can find different aspects of o focus on, more frequent could also be fine if it's right for the community. Half of c/android is just some variation on "Google sucks / hates it's users / is destroying privacy", which is fine cause it's true and there's lots of indvidual news items.

It's basically the opposite of addictive. Addictive stuff is easy, because it quickly becomes a "need" not just something you theoretically want to do but can't really be bothered right now.

Even 'fun' stuff like TV shows, I can 'want' to catch up on shows, or finish the series I was loving, but if its down to choosing and making myself get round to it, I won't. But when suddenly I get a hyper focus on some old show and I binge forty episodes in a weekend it's 'easy'. What's hard is stopping, which I guess means I'm kinda in addict mode (until I overdo it and get board and abandon the watchthrough a few episodes from the end).

None. I don't really understand who's going around getting banned? Kids?

It's the sort of thing I'd agree to because I hate commutes and that sort of inefficency. But it's also probably a bad idea. It's a lot of stress on a relationship, also it gives weird incentives - what if she no longer likes your son but wants to keep dating him to avoid having to get up early. That's not fair on either of them.

If you do it, would it be an option to offer that she stays a couple of nights each week, on a trial basis? That way she still gets to avoid some commutes, but it's obviously temporary and easier to back out of for everyone. If there's any issues you can not invite her back without having to evict a teenager.

Thanks for sharing that, it's pretty cool! But it's not the one, I'm pretty sure I'd have remembered the "shoots acorns out your hands" power! And more objectively, that's a 3e style class, and the one I'm looking for was definitely AD&D 2e.

It's not crazy to be concerned or even feel anxiety about not being able to tell if a post is a bot or a person. But being wildly hyperbolic isn't helping anyone.

I've been chatting on the Internet since the days of usenet, and back then there was no algorithm, or advertising or any motivation to drive engagement beyond our natural human desire to communicate. And it really wasn't that different than lemmy. You still got trolls, bullshit and unreasonable political takes, as well as genuine questions, thoughtful answers and useful information.

Real world personal development and action are important, and you should definitely prioritise that over chatting to strangers on the Internet. But "scribo ergo sum", I know I'm here asking questions and appreciating answers and discussions, and I know other humans irl who use lemmy, so it would seem logical that some (perhaps most) of the users here are humans and they too may appreciate my answers and discussion.

Mine was a super-specific and overpowered Dungeons and Dragons custom class for elves, that basically got cool powers from all the other classes. I'm pretty sure the class was called "Knights of Rillifane" and I came across it originally in a Compuserve message board.

As I say, it's not a good bit of game design, and it's certainly not important. But given how big the d&d loving community has been in Internet history, and how 'collectory' they are, it really surprises me that it hasn't been compiled into a netbook or turn up on a geocities website somewhere.

It's not that I think your trolling. I don't understand the question. What does house trained mean in this context? How is it different from controlled?

Similarly, I don't understand what you mean by "allowing the kill and conquer to rampage".

Very much depends on my motivation, my schedule and the weather. Walking much more than half an hour feels like a fair distance, and if it's unpleasant weather then I'd be tempted to take a bus or train partway.

But if it's nice weather and I've got plenty of time, walking an hour to go to a museum or whatever would seem perfectly normal.

Is this a story you've read but can't rememeber? Or something you've heard about? Seems a weird combination of hella vague and very specific.

I definitely feel less hydrated. A lot of carbonated waters haver a higher sodium level, so that might be part of it. Or it's just the bitter taste of carbon dioxide.

Sure, movies pay more than panel shows, but you get lots of women working as extras, even though it really doesn't pay well and involves of lot of hassle.

But more importantly, why do you think that women are more sensitive or opposed to waiting around? Not sure it's a trait or stereotype that aligns with my experience. Guys can be plenty impatient and think they're too important to wait around like a pleb.