this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
369 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

18690 readers
1318 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta allegedly gave accounts engaged in the “trafficking of humans for sex” 16 chances before suspending them, according to testimony from the company’s former head of safety and well-being, Vaishnavi Jayakumar. The testimony — along with several other claims that Meta ignored problems if they increased engagement — surfaced in an unredacted court filing related to a social media child safety lawsuit filed by school districts across the country.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 147 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

meanwhile YouTube had a 3 strike policy for copyright claims that might not even be true

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 87 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, but corporate profit margins are much more important than people

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Ha ha ha ha........ha..........

cries

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 77 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus fuck, even 3-strikes would be absurd for this...

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 31 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

17 is an oddly specific number.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 26 points 10 hours ago

I have to believe Jerry, the exec who's bad at his job but the CEO likes him, has 16 strikes. One more strike, and the CEO will be forced to update the policy again.

[–] Kooper@feddit.org 15 points 7 hours ago

Those kinds of people probably don't like anything the moment it turns 18

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

18 is too many ~~years~~ chances.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 46 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I'm not defending the policy but the title doesn't match the story:

“That means that you could incur 16 violations for prostitution and sexual solicitation, and upon the 17th violation, your account would be suspended,”

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Wait but that changes everything? Sex work doesn't automatically mean sex trafficking??

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, to me it's muddy waters. While some people look down on it, if an adult posts something that says free Saturday night, hit me up for a price... That's not anywhere near trafficking. But it is very much solicitation.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the title says only sex trafficking

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago

It appears that the article and possibly the site is just ragebait bs.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So, 17 strikes you're out.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Thats why baseball games in the 1800s were much longer.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

You should look into the history of cricket

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago

I mean, it IS The Verge. They could be so inept that they just forgot to include anything relating to the title in their story

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

that matches the title completely

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Sex work =/= sex trafficking

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Unless they have to drive to you during rush hour. Then it's sex work with traffic.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Meta allegedly gave accounts engaged in the “trafficking of humans for sex” 16 chances before suspending them,

the article is about sex trafficking, the policy would also apply to sex workers, eventually.

not everything about sex trafficking is about sex workers…

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes. Probably not on Facebook.

There's a pretty good This American Life about it. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/740/there-i-fixed-it

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

What's "This american life", beyond a podcast? Not something I'm familiar with.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Just a podcast.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 31 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

That seems like 17 strikes too many.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

To be fair, they allowed 17 strikes without repercussions. We may never actually know how many strikes it would take to get suspended on the platform

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Zero strikes and you're out!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Hurray, everyone is off the platform. Honestly, that would be for the best...

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I suggest a 1 strike policy.
Here's an example: use 1 supersonic heatseeking rocket to do a rocket strike on Zuckerberg (if he survives then use 1 more rocket until he is no longer breathing)

If successful then it could be a policy that's adopted to be used on other billionaires, muskyboy, tRUMP, etc etc.

It may not work but I say we should give it a go for about ten years to see what happens...

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

use 1 supersonic heatseeking rocket

Personally I'd go for the slap chop, aka R-9X, but I understand if you fancy heatseekers

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 16 points 14 hours ago

Meanwhile, one harmless meme and you're suspended. I don't get why people use Meta anymore. The site went to shit 20 years ago, and nobody seems to want to jump to another platform. For reasons unknown - there was no issue leaving MySpace for Facebook, so just fucking do it again.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Lol other places ban for the suspicious activity of .... being on a VPN

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 hours ago

I tried reporting a blatant kidnapping/pig butchering gang, and there literally wasn’t a category for it in their reporting mechanism. I picked the closest thing I could think of, and naturally the report just got ignored.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

"Promise me you won't be sending 15 year olds to your island next time, Epstein, or you will be banned if you do it again for the 16th time."

Although, seriously, this explains a lot why Trump admin and the oligarchs are sexual deviants.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

/community

What the fuck

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 4 hours ago