this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
81 points (97.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

22166 readers
529 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest plea for official Proton support started on Reddit, where Scout339v2 shared their screenshot of Rust running "on a server with EAC disabled to show that the game already works perfectly on Linux." Disabling Easy Anti-Cheat (EAC) is the key factor here, and part of a broader conversation where Facepunch and its Linux/Proton userbase don't see eye-to-eye.

While it's true Rust runs on Proton, you can't join official servers, and most unofficial servers, with EAC disabled. Facepunch considered changing its stance in 2022 when the Steam Deck launched, but didn't end up introducing official Proton support. COO Alistair McFarlane said at the time that Linux is "safer for cheat developers," and that trying to support EAC on another platform could reduce the team's ability to support Windows.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 56 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Then I have 'no plans' on ever giving them money for their shitty designed game

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 11 points 3 hours ago

Oh, this is about that shitty survival game‽ I thought it was talking about the rust language. I was so very confused.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 54 points 6 hours ago

This always screams of a person that thinks their views are the default views of reality. Really shows how self centered he is.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 49 points 5 hours ago

Games that have no plans for Linux are not serious about gamers.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 48 points 4 hours ago

Well, I for one am serious about anti-cheat: if the company making the game makes it more important than the game itself, I make game not important for me

[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 48 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's interesting how gamers are supposed to have a problem with people cheating in a video game, but not with their computer being compromised by bad actors.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

True and usually hackers find a workaround.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember previous outbursts from facepunch. This has nothing to do with anti-cheat, they have been staunchly anti linux for some time now. They have floated the idea of removing linux support for garrys mod for years.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I bet there's some kind of kickback from Microsoft involved here. Maybe indirectly. Because the only reason I still have a Windows PC (just one left) is to play Fortnite with my kiddo. Every other PC and tablet is running Linux since October.

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 32 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

If ring-0 access is the only way you can stop cheaters, your game must be poorly programmed.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Reminds me that DRM used to run Kernel Side until software side drm was the safest/less sketchy option.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Nah, cheating is just absurdly hard to stop. Even ring 0 anti cheat doesn't stop it entirely. At some point, I feel like the answer is similar to piracy, in that you must accept that there's going to be some amount of it, and then find a way to mitigate the damage. Because there are solutions to both of them that both go too far.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago) (1 children)

I think the way that CS does it is really the best one. Prevent the simple cheats, record games and let people handle the edge cases based on reports and suspicious activity.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I didn't know CS did this, but yeah, at a high level, that's how I'd address it, too. It's probably not a solution that scales super well due to the manual review required, and I know that game has a reputation of people still being annoyed by cheaters, but it might be the best we can do without being very invasive, like the ring 0 stuff.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 29 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unsurprising, Facepunch were hostile in the past to the idea, temporarily played around with the idea, and always will be ambivalent. Given the direction that Windows is heading, it would be a time to consider cultivating fans on different operating systems. As Microsoft is messing up in a huge way these days.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Let me tell you, the average Rust player doesnt care and Facepunch know it.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 6 points 5 hours ago

Without a doubt, as long as these players get their Rust fix, they couldn't care less about Linux or the state of Windows.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

The irony of it all is the best cheats of which I won't discuss bypass all anticheat including theirs. Their concern is only for the low hanging fruit for appearance only.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

Oh no, where will I go now to have 12 year olds tell me to kill myself while shouting racial slurs at my base.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 15 points 2 hours ago

Those who don't support them are not serious about software quality.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Seems I correctly assessed that game as sketchy bullshit

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 31 minutes ago

It's been a cash-in on DayZ for what, 13 years now?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Can't have Rust on Linux? Just do it in C/C++!

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 hours ago

Let's use SDL3 + Rust and make the game Rust in The programming language Rust.
;)

[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 hours ago

Oh no! Anyway.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Rust isn't serious about anti cheat though...

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 hours ago

Thank you for your insight, Nude Bullying Simulator dev. Obviously you know about serious subjects.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 8 points 4 hours ago

If they're so confident about that stance they should remove their games from Valve's services.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Rust is a toxic shit hole. Wasn't going to bother anyways but now I'm REALLY not going to bother with it

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I dropped about 50 hours into it trying to learn how to play. People just killed me and stole my shit the entire time. Zero helpful people.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 5 points 4 hours ago

Rust is still a thing?

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I remember there was a script(server side) that disables EAC for Linux/proton and enables it for Windows, for some reason scripting is done in C# (native language). (BTW I never played rust but learned this from a friend)

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 minutes ago

The words of a man who made a game that is now irrelevant mean nothing to the ravenous Linux user.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

I love having rootkits on my pc to play a poorly coded and Un-optimized game!

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

Thats fair, I dont expect every game to open up to linux. I know Kernel AC can be easily bypassed but it still filters some cheaters and raises the barrier to entry. It also gives a lot of people peace of mind.