this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
61 points (98.4% liked)

Linux Gaming

22166 readers
459 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest plea for official Proton support started on Reddit, where Scout339v2 shared their screenshot of Rust running "on a server with EAC disabled to show that the game already works perfectly on Linux." Disabling Easy Anti-Cheat (EAC) is the key factor here, and part of a broader conversation where Facepunch and its Linux/Proton userbase don't see eye-to-eye.

While it's true Rust runs on Proton, you can't join official servers, and most unofficial servers, with EAC disabled. Facepunch considered changing its stance in 2022 when the Steam Deck launched, but didn't end up introducing official Proton support. COO Alistair McFarlane said at the time that Linux is "safer for cheat developers," and that trying to support EAC on another platform could reduce the team's ability to support Windows.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 51 points 4 hours ago

This always screams of a person that thinks their views are the default views of reality. Really shows how self centered he is.

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Then I have 'no plans' on ever giving them money for their shitty designed game

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 1 hour ago

Oh, this is about that shitty survival game‽ I thought it was talking about the rust language. I was so very confused.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 42 points 3 hours ago

Games that have no plans for Linux are not serious about gamers.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 41 points 3 hours ago

Well, I for one am serious about anti-cheat: if the company making the game makes it more important than the game itself, I make game not important for me

[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 35 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's interesting how gamers are supposed to have a problem with people cheating in a video game, but not with their computer being compromised by bad actors.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

True and usually hackers find a workaround.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember previous outbursts from facepunch. This has nothing to do with anti-cheat, they have been staunchly anti linux for some time now. They have floated the idea of removing linux support for garrys mod for years.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I bet there's some kind of kickback from Microsoft involved here. Maybe indirectly. Because the only reason I still have a Windows PC (just one left) is to play Fortnite with my kiddo. Every other PC and tablet is running Linux since October.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 28 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Unsurprising, Facepunch were hostile in the past to the idea, temporarily played around with the idea, and always will be ambivalent. Given the direction that Windows is heading, it would be a time to consider cultivating fans on different operating systems. As Microsoft is messing up in a huge way these days.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Let me tell you, the average Rust player doesnt care and Facepunch know it.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 4 points 3 hours ago

Without a doubt, as long as these players get their Rust fix, they couldn't care less about Linux or the state of Windows.

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If ring-0 access is the only way you can stop cheaters, your game must be poorly programmed.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

Reminds me that DRM used to run Kernel Side until software side drm was the safest/less sketchy option.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago

The irony of it all is the best cheats of which I won't discuss bypass all anticheat including theirs. Their concern is only for the low hanging fruit for appearance only.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can't have Rust on Linux? Just do it in C/C++!

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 43 minutes ago

Let's use SDL3 + Rust and make the game Rust in The programming language Rust.
;)

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

Oh no, where will I go now to have 12 year olds tell me to kill myself while shouting racial slurs at my base.

[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 hours ago

Oh no! Anyway.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 10 points 1 hour ago

Those who don't support them are not serious about software quality.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 8 points 3 hours ago

If they're so confident about that stance they should remove their games from Valve's services.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 hour ago

Thank you for your insight, Nude Bullying Simulator dev. Obviously you know about serious subjects.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 38 minutes ago

Seems I correctly assessed that game as sketchy bullshit

Rust is a toxic shit hole. Wasn't going to bother anyways but now I'm REALLY not going to bother with it

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 5 points 3 hours ago

Rust is still a thing?

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

I remember there was a script(server side) that disables EAC for Linux/proton and enables it for Windows, for some reason scripting is done in C# (native language). (BTW I never played rust but learned this from a friend)

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

Rust isn't serious about anti cheat though...