this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
1012 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

7606 readers
3040 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 110 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

At least we never went socialist.

That will provide me a lot of comfort when the Fascists brutally murder me and my family for our dissent. At least they weren't filthy socialists that tried to feed, cloth, or house anyone without condition. What a nightmare hellscape that would have been.

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sensing insincerity in this statement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aviationeast@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So does Pokémon canonical have Jesus being nailed on the cross? Maybe it was Mew the only son of Arcaues? Would make Mewtwo the Antichrist?

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pre-Porygon episode Pokemon is a fucking trip

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I remember there was an episode where someone pulls out an actual gun, meaning Pal World is probably more canon than people realize.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I'd very much like to hear a mewtwo/arcaues debate on the state of the Pokemon world.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

It's interesting how when the Democrats are in power they struggle to get legislation across the line, get "outraged" when Republicans stymie their efforts, and eventually agree to cut bills down to the point where they're achieving a fraction of what they were supposed to.

But when Republicans are in power, Dems seem incapable of putting up any resistance and cry to their voters that if only they just had a few more donation dollars they'd be able to defeat fascism and then turn around and let the Republicans pass whatever awful legislation they want.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

It only takes a few corrupt Democrats to turn a plain majority into a stalemate.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Their opposition is purely performative.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ranked choice voting would help big time. But neither party will ever allow it.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ranked choice voting already exists in several local and state races, most recently DC. It's mostly blue states, because Democrats tend to allow it. Several Republican states have legislation banning it statewide, but such laws are entirely absent in blue states.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Controlled ops, and Dem leaders are Republicans

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Casteyes@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I've said it once and I'll say it again … a large portion of the current democratic party is rich. The DNC serves corporations not the people. They are controlled opposition. They will keep the status quo as long as they get to continue living their cushy lifestyle. The whole system is corrupt and that includes the DNC, they won’t be saving us.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’ve noticed the financially conservative bias of a certain minority of the Democrats, which I think you could term “corruption”. I’d say even a lot of them would prefer Americans at least be able to get by on a living wage; hence why blue states have a higher minimum.

I could be missing information you’ve found past me, but what statistics have helped you conclude a “large portion” of them are rich / serving corporations?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 45 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Whenever I see posts like this, my question is: What constitutes "something?"

Democrats vote against all the Republican bills.

Cory Booker is filibustering a bunch of judicial appointments.

They're banging the drum about how horrible everything Trump is doing is.

They support the suits and the protests.

What do you want? It seems like people just want to complain about the Democrats regardless of the realities of the situation.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 days ago (61 children)

Democrats vote against all the Republican bills

If this were even true (what was Schumer in hot water over again?), what the fuck does 'voting against republican bills' do when the black-shirts are already rounding up immigrants?

Democrats can't run around screaming about the end of democracy for 8 years and then wax romantic about the need for 'bipartisanship' when they're starting to line people up against the wall.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I remember Kamala and Mike Johnson being all smiles on Inauguration Day.

load more comments (60 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (8 children)

yeah!

just like that time Chucky boy colluded with other dinos and handed republicans the best hand we had at striking back at the administration.

wait....

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want a democratic party that is as fully willing to ratfuck and obstruct all conservative efforts as the republicans have been for decades.

I want them to stop attempting to "reach across the aisle" to an enemy faction that would never be willing to do the same.

I want them to vote 100% against every single human garbage dump nominee that Trump puts in front of them.

I want them to have state police ready to clap the cuffs on Elon Musk as soon as her enters a state where he has broken the law.

I want them to stop playing defense and to start attacking for once, and I want them to do this as a unified front.

I want representatives that are willing to pull some South Korean shit and kick down doors on unelected DOGE stooges flinging shit inside our vital institutions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

collapsed inline media

THIS is what a politician fighting to stop fascism looks like.

Not a press conference, not ‘barricading’ the door before meekly letting the DOGE lakeys in after they call the DC police, not Chuck fucking Schumer folding to Trump’s budget demands after the House stood tall and members in D+1 districts risked their position.

It’s still politics as usual for most of the leadership. Not ‘the fight to save our democracy’ like they campaigned and fundraised on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

cory booker is, at the time I'm writing, filibustering the senate and preventing any actions by the fascist-controlled Congress

if he continues for 30,000 hours, the trump administration will be over and he'll have singlehandedly saved what's left of democracy. that would be unlikely, but, maybe it wouldn't be hard for 30000 people to slow down fascism by one hour each. or 2 million people to slow fascism down by a minute.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There are some limitations to the Filibuster:

  • things that don't require a senate vote don't get a filibuster
  • confirmation hearings for secretaries and judges don't get a filibuster
  • certain types of bill such as budgets, so long as they avoid specifically off limit contents, don't get a filibuster so long as they can pass the house again

Also of note is Trump's term could get a lot shorter if after the midterm elections the 53 GOP senate seats became closer to 40 and/or if enough GOP were convinced to vote to remove Trump.

Any Democrat is better than Any Republican.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So how do I step in and filibuster for him?

Because I'm not a memeber of congress and have no power to do anything.

I think we are expecting the representatives we gave all our power to to do something with that power.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So all the judges stopping his bullshit from passing is nothing? Along with the judges that overturn his bullshit, that’s nothing also? And Corey Booker’s 19 hour long (and counting) filibuster is nothing? What about all the people that actually VOTED to try and stop this from happening in the first place? Or the people that fucking warned you this would happen.

Nothing?

You all seem to have an odd definition of “doing nothing” that’s for sure. Maybe if you all… did nothing instead of staying home during an election we’d be in a much better place.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

collapsed inline media

I voted in each primary, midterm, ballot and election - every chance I got. I was also one of the many who was warning that a shuffling corpse was a terrible candidate, that Harris wasn’t doing enough to differentiate from Biden in a meaningful way, and that constantly arming Israel’s genocide with our money was going to cost voter enthusiasm, swing states, and likely the election.

And here we are, still blaming voters. While Schumer folds on the CR or Jeffries refuses to whip votes - Pelosi at least ran a tight ship and wielded the House gavel. The Democratic leadership is waffling and waiting out for the midterms, where they’re hoping enough people are pissed off to flip the House/Senate. They’re willing to wait two years to act. Two years of deportations, two years of norms destroyed, two years of institutions gutted, allies snubbed, economic self-injury.

Can you wait two years on a political gamble? Can the country? When are we going to hold our political leadership to the fire and demand action?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Amen. At least half the voting public did something—showed up, voted, protested, filibustered, and fought every step of the way. Democrats and countless others have been in the trenches, blocking, delaying, and overturning what they can.

This meme? It does nothing. No encouragement. No solution. Just cynicism and blame. Maybe OP should take a long look in the mirror before calling everyone else out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

"Liberals will win majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, CNN projects"

The one on the right should be "Edgelord leftists posting on Lemmy"

I mean I'm not gonna deny that some like Schumer have been totally useless. But over the last few months "liberals doing nothing" has included halving Tesla's stock price and winning the Supreme Court in a state that went Trump. In prediction markets future races are looking bad for Republicans. Don't like what democrats are doing? Great, go run or support a candidate you do like. Or better yet, run as a Republican and do a hostile takeover of that party so you can challenge democrats from the left in the general too. There's enough anger at Republicans now that it could actually work, especially in safe blue districts.

[–] Bloomcole@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (16 children)

None of these things are lib achievements.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Dems biggest problem has never been results. They have done that. Time and time again. Fix the economy. Solve unemployment. Shot the steal. Whatever it is. They have actually done it each time.

But i have never seen a group that has been so mindblowingly incompetent at messaging.

Take some fucking credit you dipshits!

Seriously. Biden did almost everything we asked him to do. But the party never took credit or bragged about it enough. So much so that despite accomplishing the status quo, he still came across as a loser and lost the election for his incumbent.

They did what we asked. But we were too timid or pc to take the fucking credit! we lost because of some semblance of decorum or some other nonsense.

Brag about it you pussy ass bitches!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dota__2@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

any even remotely law abiding politician(read american "left" wing) is kinda hamstrung with the current state of affairs.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's where collaboration with a fundamentally oppressive system gets you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] adub@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

Destroy the country to "own the libs". What a world and they wanted this so they can make memes instead of trying to do anything.

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I purchased a gun before Trump took office and have been practicing at the range, as well as encouraging everyone I know to do the same. Arm yourself and prepare, this only ends one way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I'm glad this troll bait crap is barely working, but it's working a little. Come on guys, don't be a stooge:

“Once we isolate key people, we look for people we know are in their upstream – people that they read posts from, but who themselves are less influential. We then either start flame wars with bots to derail the conversations that are influencing influential people, or else send off specific tasks for sockpuppets (changing this wording of an idea here; cause an ideological split there; etc).”

The goal is to keep opinions we don't want fragmented and from coalescing in to a single voice for long enough that the memes we do want can,...

https://archive.is/PoUMo

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 14 points 2 days ago

Really what else can one do besides obstruct and sue hoping to stop the tsunami of chaos that this admin embodies?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

The liberal version of resisting fascism is quiet collaboration.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (53 children)

Can do the exact same thing with "progressives" that don't vote.

load more comments (53 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›