this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
1012 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

7606 readers
3040 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 45 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Whenever I see posts like this, my question is: What constitutes "something?"

Democrats vote against all the Republican bills.

Cory Booker is filibustering a bunch of judicial appointments.

They're banging the drum about how horrible everything Trump is doing is.

They support the suits and the protests.

What do you want? It seems like people just want to complain about the Democrats regardless of the realities of the situation.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 days ago (61 children)

Democrats vote against all the Republican bills

If this were even true (what was Schumer in hot water over again?), what the fuck does 'voting against republican bills' do when the black-shirts are already rounding up immigrants?

Democrats can't run around screaming about the end of democracy for 8 years and then wax romantic about the need for 'bipartisanship' when they're starting to line people up against the wall.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I remember Kamala and Mike Johnson being all smiles on Inauguration Day.

load more comments (60 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (8 children)

yeah!

just like that time Chucky boy colluded with other dinos and handed republicans the best hand we had at striking back at the administration.

wait....

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want a democratic party that is as fully willing to ratfuck and obstruct all conservative efforts as the republicans have been for decades.

I want them to stop attempting to "reach across the aisle" to an enemy faction that would never be willing to do the same.

I want them to vote 100% against every single human garbage dump nominee that Trump puts in front of them.

I want them to have state police ready to clap the cuffs on Elon Musk as soon as her enters a state where he has broken the law.

I want them to stop playing defense and to start attacking for once, and I want them to do this as a unified front.

I want representatives that are willing to pull some South Korean shit and kick down doors on unelected DOGE stooges flinging shit inside our vital institutions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

collapsed inline media

THIS is what a politician fighting to stop fascism looks like.

Not a press conference, not ‘barricading’ the door before meekly letting the DOGE lakeys in after they call the DC police, not Chuck fucking Schumer folding to Trump’s budget demands after the House stood tall and members in D+1 districts risked their position.

It’s still politics as usual for most of the leadership. Not ‘the fight to save our democracy’ like they campaigned and fundraised on.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every single one of us fantasizes about stepping in front of a gun to save an innocent person. I even wanted to do that when I heard about an illegal ICE deportation less than 30 miles from me.

But fascist actors like DOGE sweep in like burglars, and run before you know they’re there. They remove livelihoods by E-mail. There’s nothing to stand in front of.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

"The president does not have unilateral authority to shut down an expenditure, or instrumentalities funded by Congress, without the authorization of Congress."

The Korean politicians literally put their lives on the line, and called the coup’s bluff by doing so. Posting on Twitter ‘man, Congress outta do something about that Dogewhen he is a Congressional leader while kicking the issue to the courts to ‘work it out’ is political theatre. Stand up, or step off Chuck.

If lawmakers don’t challenge DOGE, by passing new laws or going to court, they risk losing the powers Congress has held for two and a half centuries. Driesen and other legal experts said judges might consider the lack of congressional opposition as they decide cases on this question.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

1- If Democrats had voted against all Republican bills, we'd be in a shutdown right now.

2- Booker's filibuster is good. There were also many, many options available to Democrats early in the confirmation process that they chose not to take. For example, if they demanded unanimous consent on every procedure, a roll call roll vote would be required to move anything forward. They could file deleterious motions constantly to slow everything down. McConnell successfully used these tactics just a few months ago to force Schumer cut a deal on judicial appointments at the end of the last Congress.

3- The suits are being brought by Democratic Attorneys General, who have been killing it. They remember how dangerous Trump was and prepared accordingly. The national Democrats, however, clearly had no plan other than, "Kamala will win," and didn't adapt at all in the months between the election and the inauguration.

Chuck Schumer is the poster boy for this shortsightedness. The only possible explanation for his actions on the budget bill is that he assumed at least a few House Republicans would defect and the bill wouldn't reach the Senate. When that didn't happen, he had to suddenly decided between funding the government, which would a terrible move since (aside from being an awful bill) every House Democrat had just stuck their neck out to try to shoot it down, or defunding the government, which had its own risks, but it's own benefits as well. Not only did he make the wrong choice, but he made it so abruptly he threw his entire party into chaos.

4- All of this is indicative of a party that is working from an out of date playbook that is hopeless obsolete in the face of fascism. Schumer and James Carvil started the term by telling Democrats to lay low and wait for Trump to screw up. Jefferies was advocating for bipartisanship for the fiest two months of the administration. The general consensus is that the legislative branch is completely helpless, and they simply need to wait for the courts to save us.

None of this will work. The Trump administration's fuck-ups don't matter if they're not planning on holding free and fair elections. Bipartisanship has been dead for almost 20 years. Court rulings won't save us; Trump is already defying court orders, and the Supreme Court has been pack with regime loyalists. Some Senators, like Booker, seem to be waking up to these realities, but the entire Democratic party needs to be looking to every single opportunity to slow and obstruct the Trump regime, and the leadership is not doing that.

Defeating the Trump administration will require widespread public mobilization and and an opposition party that's ready to play hardball. The Democratiic leadership seems to content with only doing the first half, and fundraising in lieu of opposition. That's going to get us all killed.

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is it. These kids never get off the memes long enough to watch house committees live every day. There’s like 40 cases being help up by non partisan federal judges.

This is the comprise to not burning down the country and demanding heads, in a civilized country we battle with armies lawyers instead of cannon fodder.

That’s all plan b. Same as it ever was.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By "something" people mean accountability and punishments, physically restricting the people responsible so they can cause no further harm.

Instead they walk free and are allowed to keep breaking our society

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The next step youre alluding to is going to be in history books for the next 300 years. Better not miss.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Our inaction on climate change will be felt for a lot longer than centuries. We've already missed, it's just a question of how badly.

Nobody in 300 years is going to think we revolted too soon or care if we did it wrong.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

48 and counting. They like to point out how Trump doesn’t listen, but he’s only defying injunctions. That’s at most a contempt of court charge. It’s not until he defies a ruling that they’ve committed a crime by disobedience.

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There’s a clock ticking down for disregarding the el Salvador plane. This is their first test against the checks and balances.

The Russian doom bots shitting on our only defense are playing for their dinner.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you want?

They want the people they voted out of power to suddenly gain all the power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)