This is possibly the stupidest policy from the stupidest, most wasteful, inefficient administration ever. These weirdos really need to stop.
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
124 points (100.0% liked)
News
33058 readers
4473 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why do you think they’re even interested? Is it practice on political influence by force, before doing something in house? Is it to prevent the spread of something like socialist democracy? If only to beat the drum of local news, why Venezuela specifically and why was the impact on Venezuela planned out so specifically?
Similar verbiage is what Putin used to enter Ukraine. Just a small special opration right?
Also, Venezuela is going to hit US air assets hard, this will be a PR failure all around if Trump tries it as well as stupid and pointlessly cruel.
I hope so but I wouldn't bet on it. How exactly do you think Venezuela can pull this?
Trump stopped attacking Yemen because they threw enough stuff back that it made the US military look bad. Venezuela is way better armed than Yemen.
The US population expects invincibility, and that doesn't exist on the real world.
TBH the most loses from Yemen were airplanes thrown into the sea from the air carriers.
The most expensive loses were from mistakes caused by the constant need to react to their attacks, and the most numerous loses were caused by throwing things at their attacks.
And that was enough to make the military look irredeemably incompetent inside the US. Imagine what will happen when they fight an adversary that may actually hit something once or twice. Under a different president, or if they had any non-criminal reason to go into war, the reaction would probably be different, but that's not the case.
🍿🍿🍿
I am not saying Venezuela will win, I am saying it has invested enough in air defense that the likelihood of the US being able to launch an air campaign without embarassing losses is lower than it appears at least in terms of how the media covers it, and the political consequences of a blundered strike that loses US lives and equipment in a high profile way would be devastating to an already very unliked republican party. Trump and his administration really can't risk looking any more dumb or incompetent than he does now, a limit is being reached though it is hard to believe one exists, it does.
If Trump and his cronies launches strikes, he will bungle the US militaries' advantage, this administration is too dysfunctional to do otherwise.
You sure though? I'd expect it at similar or lower level as Iran was. I might be wrong, though, certainly hope so. Funnily enough, they have also 2 or 3 F-16s.
I think the amount of money in the US military industrial complex that has gone into obsessing over how best to bomb Iran is probably incomprehensible. Venezeula too a degree, but not anywhere as much. There was no way Iran could entirely deny US airpower, but so what?
This isn't just a question of strike capable technology vs. counters it is about landscapes and who knows them best and has invested in their idiosyncracies, and I don't get the feeling Venezuelans have been wasting all this time thinking the US wouldn't try some shit like this.
Were the Iran strikes successful? What did they do but confirm to the world the irrationality of US foreign intervention under this administration?
If the US wants to project actual power into Venezuela it will have to get its hands dirty and that is where the wheels will immediately fall off.
Iran invested a hell of a lot more into air defenses and really it was Israel (which has significantly less military power than the US) that cleared the way for the one US air strike there. The effectiveness of that air campaign remains to be seen, but it certainly weakened the Ayatollah, and set back their nuclear weapons program. How much damage it did to their nuke program would be something that would be kept secret by all parties, so there's no way to know. Doesn't stop people with a political agenda from speculating of course.
Of course whether or not the strikes were effective doesn't change the fact that Israel was able to establish air superiority over Iran rather quickly. The US has the same weapon systems Israel has, and more of it. A lot more of it.
The US doing air strikes on Venezuela would be stupid for all kinds of geopolitical reasons, but the capability of Venezuela to inflict significant losses on the US military isn't one of them. Venezuela has older versions of the same weapon systems Iran had since Iran and Russia are their main suppliers.
At least Cheney had the common sense to rig the attack beforehand so there’s no way it wouldn’t work.
If they’re not telling you why it’s happening, they’re lying. Just like Putin amassing military on Ukraine’s border. “Oh, that military buildup? No reason…”
Just like Civs. Whoever is in control of us needs to stop with these crazy as moves.
Our troops are merely passing by.
"what we need is a short, victorious war" -David Weber