So the federal government subsidizes not only Walmart employee wages, but Walmarts grocery sales too? And Mamdani is apparently crazy for saying New York should run its own grocery stores that actually benefit the community instead of making the Walton family richer.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Wait, I wonder, who was funding that message 🤔
Alice Walton, the world’s richest woman, listed her address as a post office box in Bentonville, Arkansas — Walmart’s hometown — when she made a $100,000 donation in August, on top of a $100,000 donation in April. Walton has little history of political giving in New York, beyond donating to pro-charter school groups and candidates. Mamdani has said he opposes the expansion of charter schools.
I dunno why it says "If SNAP goes dark" becuase it already did go dark. It's already been a week woth no payments and it looks like nothing is going to change that. SNAP has already "gone dark".
judges are forcing the USDA to pay snap this month… latest ruling was by today.
it’s not dark yet
Don't count your chickens until they hatch. Or in this case, don't count your SNAP until it's actually in your pocket.
The article is from Oct 29. I doubt the SNAP situation is news to many on the fediverse. I shared it more so because A) What a tone deaf headline, and B) To share the epiphany it caused me.
Considering that Walmart is one of the largest corporations benefiting from deliberately underpaying their workers and telling them it's the government's job to feed them, I find that my field of fucks is barren.
SNAP is basically a tax break for walmart. Underpay the staff and let the government cover their food, which is often bought at walmart.
Oh no. Not Walmart. Leave it to America to be more concerned about the shareholders and not the people within the borders.
That's so much money. It's immensely frustrating that any assistance programs we come up with ultimately become a massive wealth transfer to big companies.
SNAP, subsidized student loans/forgiveness, Medicaid/Medicare, etc. The market will just happily absorb the free taxpayer money and then still raise prices on everyone because of the increased demand.
and then still raise prices on everyone because of the increased demand.
Ostensibly because of increased demand, actually due to greed.
In a world not run by the rich, for the rich this wouldn't be an issue. Just tax large corporations over a certain size at a slightly higher rate and redistribute it back down to the poorest, turning it into a loop.
This isn't new for Walmart. They have 'how to apply for food stamps' employee programs. They have food drives for their employees during the holidays b/c they can't afford food. All while taking in obscene profits.
Thanks for the reminder of why I never shop there. Disgusting.
Yes millions of people can't access food, but have you thought about the impact this is having on Walmart's profits?
Walmart gets it both ways. They get to under pay full time employees to the point they are eligible for snap, then they make money when people use snap in their stores.
The American taxpayers are basically subsidizing Walmart.
What the article doesn't mention is how many of Walmarts employees are on SNAP themselves.
Thats what i thought they were referencing at first. That Walmarts were going to be shutting their doors as all their snap subsidised employees started quitting in search of jobs that they could actually put food on the table with.
Similarly, I expect that a lot of airline CEOs are calling their pet Senators after Trump announced plans to scale back air traffic controllers.
Yea they are calling for more scale backs so they can implement "priority pricing" or bidding or some other price gouging technique. Run half the planes but still make the same if not more profits.
To be fair, running half the planes would be great for the environment.
That's an aspect of social security nets that's rarely talked about: They stabilize domestic demand and thereby the local economy.
Probably more. Their starving employees will be stealing food from them to survive.
If you see someone stealing food; No, you didn't.
Honestly, I'm at a point where if I see someone stealing anything from a large corporation, no the fuck I didn't.
Lmaooooooo
Get fucked.
Also sad how many people there apparently exist in "food deserts" that a Walmart is their only option.
Walmart created a lot of those food deserts.
This is the only good news from trump's term. The waltons losing money in this way exposes who they are, and might piss them off enough to do something.
CEOs should do to Trump what the Roman senators did to Julius Caesar.
Interesting how this billionaire family is making so much money off food stamps.
Walmart gets financed via gov SNAP on two fronts - they sell stuff (for profit) for gov SNAPs, & their employees' wages have to get subsidized by gov SNAP (for their profit).
Also only the stores net 20bn a year to the family (& other shareholders), so it's a shame we are talking about them losing 2bn (over two full months) and not their full-time workers going hungry.
Also the SNAP program is 100bn annually (for 40m people) & 25bn~28bn of it gets spent in Walmart stores (their total revenue is about 680bn & they employ a large percentage of underpaid workers).
Here is a perhaps more informative link:
https://www.newsweek.com/walmart-set-to-lose-billions-from-snap-benefits-stopping-in-november-10945862
I would not be surprised to read a headline soon stating "Walmart to receive government subsidies for lost SNAP revenue."
Regardless if SNAP has been funded.
Walmart saves money by not paying a livable wage, they save money by not paying taxes, they receive money from the taxpayers who paid into snap. No wonder why they keep making profits year after year.
