this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
608 points (98.7% liked)

News

33058 readers
3923 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The shutdown will halt about $8 billion a month in federal food assistance. Walmart captures 24% of all SNAP shopper spending, according to Numerator’s 2025 SNAP Evolution report—triple Kroger’s share and far ahead of Costco, Amazon and Sam’s Club.

Walmart was the first retailer to accept SNAP online in all 50 states in 2023 and launched the Walmart+ Assist program, which offers half-price memberships for those receiving aid.

“If SNAP payments stop, spending by the lowest income groups will fall,” said Neil Saunders, managing director of data and analytics firm GlobalData. “Walmart gets a plurality of the spending, so it will be hit the hardest.”

This was somewhat epiphanic for me.

I already recognized companies such as Walmart were subsidizing pay through social programs such as SNAP and essential funneling/laundering tax payer money to their executives.

This headline made me further realize they’re not only making taxpayers subsidize wages, they’ve also effectively turned the USD into a form of company scrip. While that scrip can be spent at some other locations I bet a large percent of funneled right back to e.g. Walmart itself. If you already work at Walmart it makes spending your SNAP benefit there easier.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yes millions of people can't access food, but have you thought about the impact this is having on Walmart's profits?

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Walmart gets it both ways. They get to under pay full time employees to the point they are eligible for snap, then they make money when people use snap in their stores.

The American taxpayers are basically subsidizing Walmart.

[–] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

I never considered the second point. Holy hell US lawmakers are captured by special interests

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And yet no one is EVER happy to be there

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like the waltons are getting it 3 ways then, since they seem the types to enjoy just the misery of it all.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

True sociopaths in every sense of the word

Bappy enough that they only shopped there, causing all the small businesses in their areas to close.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think its important for people to know there are consequences for supporting fascism. Walmart has been donating to conservative PACs for decades and the Waltons themselves tilt even harder than the company.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

I don't disagree, it's just so fucking frustrating that people can scream from the rooftops for months/years that "this is bad, bad things will happen" and people will ignore them until it affects them personally or it affects a company's profits.

The problem is all the people starving, not Walmart losing less than 1% of their profits. But apparently that less than 1% profit loss is what people listen to. It's disgusting.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

Honestly? If it's what gets people to be fed, I'm okay with doing it because people starving is bad for the economy.
I'd rather we did at least the bare minimum for the right reason, but I'll accept the wrong reason. At this point, hoping for more than the bare minimum seems unrealistic when we're most likely to get the wrong thing for the wrong reasons.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm sure they'll just get a handout directly from the government instead.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Our profits are in the RED, pls give money daddy govt 🥺🥺" but also somehow still makes record-breaking profits.

Remember kids, when a company says their profits are in the red, that does not mean they are losing money - THEY STILL MADE A PROFIT. Just not as much profit as last year.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Bruh, that would certainly be devastating, and it's disgusting I can see that happening.

Maybe thisnmeans something might get done about all this.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, would you prefer to ignore the blatant corruption? ... If minimum wage (Walmart wage) were living wage, far fewer people would be on food stamps.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That is not what I said at all and off topic from the discussion.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

One point would be WalMart has 2B in lobby money to make it stop