this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
1263 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

8468 readers
1618 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 271 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Grey Poupon is not fancy mustard. You can buy that shit in any grocery store, it was developed by food scientists and is mass produced in giant semi-automated factories. It's also not particularly expensive. If you can only afford yellow mustard but not Grey Poupon you shouldn't be buying any mustard because your budget is way too tight to be paying for condiments you can get free in a fast food restaurant.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The only reason people think it’s fancy is because of some dumb commercials made in the 80s.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Those weren't from the '90s? Am I so old that I'm now conflating these decades?

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, and I'm sorry. I'm also right there with you.

Also, don't forget to take your medication this evening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They were referenced in Wayne's World in 1992 and I'm guessing that they were at least a couple of years old by then.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yup, you're right. I was actually pulling up to people in traffic and asking them this in '92. Because I thought it was hilarious.

It still is, but it used to be, too

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

Excuse me, those commercials from the 80s are a very important piece of early millennial culture.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is some perspective.

It reminds me of another conversation starter about wealth inequality. Where do poor people buy their bed sheets? The answers are usually Walmart or Salvation Army. Where do middle class people buy sheets? Nordstroms or some other department store. Where do rich people buy sheets? They don’t. They have people for that.

[–] christopher@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The rich use people for bed sheets?

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 139 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is just a totally brain dead take. Maybe the SNAP recipient likes brown mustard and prioritizes it. And you don’t care that much so you don’t prioritize it. If it mattered to you, you would budget to get fancy mustard.

If you really do feel you can’t afford fancy mustard, you shouldn’t be mad at the person who earns food assistance and then uses it to buy fancy mustard, you should be mad that you aren’t making enough to afford fancy mustard.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s also like $4 to get a bottle of Gray Poupon, absolutely ridiculous to be trying to whip people into a frenzy over that to begin with.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not the first time Republicans threw an absolute shit fit over negligibly more expensive mustard...

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

...while blowing hundreds or even thousands of dollars on red hats and overpriced campaign souvenirs.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because in their minds, these people should be suffering more. Government food assistance should take the form of gruel, if it exists at all.

Edit: Oh I just realized what you were referencing lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is just a totally brain dead take.

Well yeah, they're complaining about people who receive SNAP benefits, so that's a given.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Theres the rub. The working class and poor have been indoctrinated to believe that they are their own enemies, and the puppet masters that orchestrated all of this class warfare are the rich to keep us busy from chopping their heads off.

The poor aren’t our enemies. They are the frogs boiling in water that the rich use to determine what they can do to everyone else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yes, the classic “the poor people are secretly happy and that bothers me” argument. It’s like a cat call for stupid people. The whole point of it is to say “you’re not allowed to have anything remotely nice because I consider myself better than you.”

It’s mental illness made into a political platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or just get off the Nazi platform entirely. Seems pretty simple.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Consider that this person is the type to be actively funding the Nazi platform.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Yes the people with blue checkmarks are funding Nazis, but the dude pointing out the cost of mustard could also just fucking leave that shithole and leave it to rot. Same with anyone else left on there that doesn’t want to support Nazis.

Just fucking leave the platform.

Kill off whitepeopletwitter already.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's so weird seeing that sunshine account when our local sunshine lemming is the opposite.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yellow mustard is not less fancy. It's yellow because it has turmeric in it. That's more ingredients and it's one of those fancy unique spices.

The reason it's cheap is because Americans like the flavor of turmeric in their mustard so some companies have made a cheap version of it.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Plus, different mustards for different foods. I like a yellow with a lot of things, but on a hotdog is pretty classic. I like a spicy brown mustard with some chicken. And maybe a stoneground for a deli sandwich. Chinese mustard from some restaurants, like with spring rolls, is also quite the treat at times, if you like the spice level! I'm hungry.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Imagine being the kind of ghoul that thinks if people need assistance, that assistance should be the absolute bottom of the barrel lest someone who didn't need the assistance chose to not spend the money they have the freedom to decide how to spend.

Life isn't zero sum.

If you want fancier mustard and you're not on food stamps, just spend one of the extra dollars you must have to cause that. It's not gonna run out

Edit: typo

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Life isn’t zero sum.

That is the crux of it. They believe it is. Wholeheartedly. It's part of their core being at this point. If someone is receiving something, they must be losing something in return. It's their tax money.

They're incapable of making the mental connection that corporations and the rich aren't paying anywhere near even a fair share of taxes that could entirely pay for those programs to apply to every citizen, including themselves. And the media preys on that to further pit themselves against their fellow citizens because it's all owned by those same rich assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dmention7@midwest.social 32 points 1 day ago (12 children)

It's not even just that, they believe that people on government assistance need to be constantly shamed and humiliated, otherwise they will never have the motivation to pull themselves out of poverty.

I had an argument with a big-L "Libertarian" acquaintance who straight up admitted that he would rather pay more in taxes to implement new stricter oversight and systems to restrict what people spend their WIC/SNAP benefits on than endure the possibility that someone might buy a bag of Doritos with said assistance. The cherry on top was him--again, a "Libertarian"--claiming it would be to ensure they are making healthy, state-approved, food choices.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

They charge for the blue checkmarks? And...people do it? I haven't had xitter since years before nazi boy bought it.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, it was one of the more contreversial changes he did. Before, you had to be "vetted" by xitter staff as being both notable and who you said you were. That wasn't a great system, and was effectively a nepotism/who you knew game, but you wouldn't see blue checkmarks for fake accounts.

It used to be a sign of trustworthiness.

Now anyone can get one for a monthly fee.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

what I find shocking is that the website still exists and has so many users; I even know a user IRL who hasn't noticed it has gotten any worse since Elon took over ...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now, it just marks you as somebody stupid enough to give Elon money for no reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what I like about universal basic income. This argument no longer exists.

I was on unemployment one time and had to decide between staying on unemployment and accepting a job where I barely made any more money after gas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I love the idiocy of the view that the poorest among us are eating like kings for free while we all suffer and toil for peanuts. I mean, how dumb do you have to be? I've got a steal of a deal on some property on mars you may be interested in.

[–] jtj4135@lemmy.zip 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

I have MAGA family. The first thing they always mention about SNAP is how "welfare queens" are gaming the system, even though they were all on food stamps at one point. It's purely all about racism and punching down. They don't like the idea of black and brown people eating on "their" taxdollars. However, when my brother was on food stamps, it was out of "necessity" because he relied on SNAP to feed his step children.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 21 points 18 hours ago

who is eating that much mustard to be unable to afford it

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago

I've encountered people like this. They absolutely loathe when someone points out that what they said was wrong

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Are poor people really gorging themselves on fine condiments? Of course not. Ridiculous.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Yes, we are. I have nothing to put them on though, I'm just pouring Poupon straight down the throat hole.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 16 points 20 hours ago

Whole discussion is about " I can only afford 1/3 price generic mustard, but SNAP recipients are spoiled"

SNAP funds can also be used to buy cheap mustard to stetch limited SNAP budget.

[–] The3represents@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like generic yellow mustard. What the fuck is "Sunshine" complaining about?

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're complaining about "welfare queens", a common anti-poor trope. I doubt they even care about mustard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demigod21@lemmy.zip 14 points 22 hours ago

If that’s all you can afford, you might need snap tbh

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

They're only one mustard. It's spelled penis backwards and it's made in the beautiful small town of Põltsamaa.

collapsed inline media

If any mustard enthusiasts are reading this, I strongly recommend you prepare your nostrils and try this. It's amazing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"poor people shouldn't be able to afford food because I'm irresponsible with my money"

.... That's what this sounds like.

If you're not "poor enough" to need snap, and you can't afford to buy whatever food you want, within reason, then either, you need snap and you're in denial, or you need to learn money management.

Snap recipients are forced to spend the money on food, since that's the only place that money can be spent AFAIK.... So they're forced to be responsible with their food money. They can't use the funds to get drunk at the pub and stumble down the street picking fights and ending up in the drunk tank.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›