this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
254 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

75756 readers
1916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MightyPez@fedia.io 104 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Any time someone says an ultra cheap monitoring device is subscription free I just picture an odd man running a curio shop telling me his wares don't cost money

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 16 hours ago

The actual hardware cost of these devices is actually minimal. Basically any wifi capable microcontroller, a camera and depending on implementation some storage (or a micro sd-card holder). So that price is only cheap in comparison to existing products.

For reference, said microcontroller with basic camera can be had for like 3$ or something.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 87 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

...and do they sell data, including video, to law enforcement and insurance?

Sincerely, A person who recently was in a fender bender and was not surprised at all when Progressive shared "incident footage" from a Ring camera across the street at a location completely unrelated to the fender bender

(They ARE selling your data, folks. NEVER trust big tech to act in your best interest)

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

I stopped my Ring subscription but kept the doorbell camera.

It wasn't until a year later when I was moving and the house was almost completely empty (still had internet/wifi setup) and I looked at the wifi app and saw that the ring doorbell still had significant data usage.

They were clearly still capturing my doorbell video.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 6 points 10 hours ago

It's a rebranded Tuya device, and they don't sell your data to any law enforcement or insurance.

They do however comply with Chinese laws and all your data is readily available for the Chinese government.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 38 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

From the listing:

Answer your door from anywhere in the world with this remote viewing Video Doorbell.

So I assume you're not expected to self-host this. Which means they have to run and maintain servers. And $16/person ain't covering the cost of this device + servers indefinitely.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 17 points 10 hours ago

It's a rebranded Tuya doorbell. So there aren't any subscriptions, though you will be giving them all your data.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 10 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Which means they have to run and maintain servers.

I'd bet money that it works just like similar devices from Reolink. Local recording to SD Card or NVR. If you want cloud recording then you're paying a monthly subscription.

This device from Aldi is at a very low pricepoint but it's specs are garbage. 480p recording? In 2025? C'mon...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

any chance this can be done through your router/modem, where your phone app connects to external ip of router and is the "server end point" for your doorbell?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 15 hours ago

I mean it's certainly possible, it's just a matter of whether the doorbell firmware/software will support it. And the answer is almost always no.

[–] kek@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago

DDNS/P2P with local storage?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

collapsed inline media

It may not require a subscription fee, but that's really only a minor concern.

Having my video surveillance be uploaded to a cloud service and having to use some proprietary app to use my device is the real problems.

If you want security cameras, look for boring Power over Ethernet cameras that have an RTSP output. They connect to your network and provide a video stream out a specific port. Then you can plug that into whatever FOSS network video recording system you're using (Zone Minder or Frigate) and then you can access it like you access any other thing on your local network.

Never goes to a cloud, never leaves your house.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

If it has local storage then it doesn't get uploaded anywhere.

It also has BT so the offline mode could be simply "record to SD card and view videos using some app via Bluetooth".

Online mode with notifications and two-way talking has to require internet access so I definitely wouldn't trust it, with or without subscription.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

It's a rebranded Tuya device, which can actually be used in a local only mode.

I wouldn't trust connecting it to the Tuya online services though that is for certain.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 20 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I believe this is only for the European market though. Aldi has stores in the United States, but I don't believe it's available here.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Are these even legal in Europe (the part that is not the UK...)?

[–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think yes, as long as it only sees within your private property.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Front yards don’t have the expectation of privacy… that applies to backyards doesn’t it?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm no expert, but I believe this is down to the individual member states.

In my country (the NL) it is technically not allowed to film the public street with an automated camera, which effectively makes Ring and equivalents illegal to install in most places

Practically this is not really enforced though, so you see them everywhere anyway.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

It's indeed not enforced here, but on top of that the police would really like to know that you have cameras filming public space.

Not so they can do something about it, but so they know they can come to you to ask for footage if something happens.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Why wouldn't they be? Is it illegal to record people without their permission in the EU or something? Clueless American here.

[–] troed@fedia.io 9 points 18 hours ago

Yes, with fix mounted cameras. You can walk around and record with your phone etc though.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You cannot permanently record public places and you may not publish recordings of people (as in them being the main content in the video) without their consent. A temporary recording or live stream should be pretty much a non-issue, especially if you don't do anything with it other than watching it.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

By "permanently record" you mean "keep the footage forever"? Security camera systems usually record on a loop, I doubt this one will be any different. They don't want to manage all that storage anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Looked at my Florida Aldi, no luck.

[–] troed@fedia.io 9 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Security researcher here. I'm assuming this to be some low cost chinese easily hacked thing.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

The product page says it offers cloud storage. Though you maybe can use it offline by recording to an SD card.

So it may not require a subscription, but it still requires an online service... which kind of misses the point that people make about these things being privacy nightmares.

It wasn't the fee that people were worried about, it was the network video camera uploading to a cloud service which can be accessed by the secret police.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago

Yup, it's a rebranded Tuya device.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Do you have a recommendation for consumer-priced outdoor cameras/doorbells? Seems like a minefield.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't have input on cameras specifically, but I have gone pretty deep into trying to understand how to maximise security and interoperability in smart home stuff, through open source control.

A starting point for the you-in-control app to use for smart devices is Home assistant. I was surprised by how easy it was to set up self hosted smart home stuff, largely because there's loads of guides that build around home assistant. So whether a particular camera works with home assistant is a good starting search filter

[–] troed@fedia.io 2 points 16 hours ago

Only cameras I recommend are not consumer priced :/ Axis. You do get full access, can run your own code and offline etc.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

Reolink for the cameras and deny them internet access. You can tell them to record to internal SD Card and / or setup an NVR like Frigate. If you don't want "roll your own" headaches and have the money for it then use gear from Ubiquiti and UniFi Protect.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So exactly the same, but a lot cheaper?

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago

Can't say anything about Ring unfortunately, haven't analyzed them myself :/

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Nah, they make them in the stockroom out of leftover shipping boxes and old VCRs.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No subscription fee yet. Enshittification hits everything eventually.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago

It uses an SD card for data. But why read an article.

load more comments
view more: next ›