this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
54 points (85.5% liked)

Technology

75756 readers
7151 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Børnich admitted that much of the work will be done by teleoperators in the beginning. Owners will have access to an app where they can schedule when the teleoperator can take over NEO and where they can specify the task they want the machine to do.

Those teleoperators are gonna see a LOT of dicks.

[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sooooo some random will be controlling it... They do know half of them are just gonna be handjob machines, right?

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s essential that they do not damage the cylinder

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Hahahahah, good one

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

opening doors, fetching items and turning the lights on or off

That's worthless.

teleoperation

I got rid of Microsoft, getting rid of Google and dozens of other surveillance aggregators. Why would I want this?

The idea is dead on arrival. Except maybe for a few very specific circumstances.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No it's not.

It might be to you, but there are enormous numbers of elderly and disabled people who would benefit from more assistance.

I still wouldn't trust a robot around them given how inherently dangerous a massive motorized contraption is, but we also shouldn't be blind to accessibility and utility just because we don't personally need it.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why would I want this?

Bold of you to assume there aren’t plenty of folks out there willing to overlook any potential privacy concerns for their very own ‘robot’ butler.

[–] bluspoon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Worthless? You clearly don't have children.

They can open doors and leave lights on, but somehow not turn off / close.

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So instead of teaching your kids basic human interaction with trivial objects, you would prefer an Indian guy doing it with a teleoperated 20k chassis? Yes, my idea of parenting is vastly differs from yours :)

[–] bluspoon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Not at all.

Obviously the joke fell flat.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

There's hydraulic devices you can attach to basically any door to make them close automatically, and a micro-radar presence-sensing light switch is maybe $100 bucks if that.

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Step 1: “AI will replace human labor.”
Step 2: “Actually, we still need a few humans to label the data.”
Step 3: “Okay, the humans are now teleoperating the robots directly.”
Step 4: “Wait, that’s just… labor again.”

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except now the labour is hidden in a corporate warehouse and you can't see the abuse.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

Or Alternatively they're sitting at home in their pajamas enjoying a nice cup of coffee 🤷‍♂️

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I thought that said teleportation and I was like "how does that help something learn?"

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Privacy, shmivacy.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

I don't want this. I just want a robot that can fold laundry. I don't care if it can only fold 80% of it and if it takes all day for a single basket. I'd happily pay 1-2K for it too!

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why not just, you know, employ an actual human to do your chores in the first place? It'll almost certainly be a lot cheaper than this clanker...

Besides, there's no guarantee that those teleoperators won't be literal slaves.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I appreciate the thought but which would you choose:

Full time minimum wage US worker at $7¼/hr or $15,080/yr vs $20,000 one time purchase?

I agree with you that these things are likely underpaid labor (maybe including literal slavery, or job conditions close enough to count anyways), but I don't think your argument is going to be convincing to anyone actually considering getting one.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago

Someone thought: "People keep playing video games where they do chores, what's the next step...?"

[–] noretus@crazypeople.online 3 points 2 days ago

I'm just surprised that it seems relatively cheap. Not to me personally, mind you, but I would expect something like this that's actually decent quality to cost somewhere more like 100k.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nice, looking forward to the day when I can get one that runs 100% locally. Not sure if it would be cost effective to hire someone to come in my home to operate the thing vs. just hiring a maid service, though.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Is this how irobot starts?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 day ago

From the backrooms, straight to your home!

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'd only buy a robomaid if it's 100% wireless.