this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

memes

17888 readers
2471 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rich high school friend shared a newspaper clipping with us (in the high school group) in which he was featured. Apparently he had a car accident with a girl in the seat next to him, and had suffered mentally for it over the guilt of crippling the girl. The initial reaction of the group was "ohh, so sorry you had to go through that".

Later, once it sunk in that a) why was this featured in the newspaper at all, and b) his family is very rich, I think we all came to the understanding that he had basically crippled a girl with his reckless driving, could not fix the problem with money, and so in order to help mitigate against a future court case or to discredit the girl, his family paid for a sob piece in the press.

He was your typical rich kid: fast car, no consequences, if someone comes up with a joke he will steal it and claim it as his own. Shit eating grin, until you have nothing you can offer him so he goes and talks to someone else.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just got one going on now.

An extended family group chat that was 99% baby photos until one person posted photos of their kids at a protest this weekend and then the chuddy trad-wife sov-cits in the family threw a fit.

They all left the chat and said they'll only be reachable on Facebook.

Oh darn. All the shucks.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Now that is what i call an efficient way to filter out the trash from your group chat.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I came here for people's group chat incidents

What I actually got is a flame war against vegans and a flame war against non vegans and they both hate vegetarians

Please reply with your group chat incidents

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only incidents we have is my mother's husband keeps making new group chats. All the same people, somehow new groups.

All the same content though, just us sharing cat photos.

[–] sleepdrifter@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

My dad somehow manages to get email addresses into group MMS chats, and each email response creates a new thread

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Do you really expect anything less from an anonymous public message board? It's practically a Law of the Internet that invoking any version of the words "vegan" or "vegetarian" is bound to spark outrage from one side or the other.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Got drunk and sent a picture of my dick wrapped in a fur blanket with a face drawn on it and the caption "winter is cumming"

Was pretty funny all in all, was an incredibly rowdy group chat

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

/r/cospenis if this was reddit.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't remember where it was from or if it was just one of the degens in the chat but I remember the phrase "cockstume party" being thrown around.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

I had a friend tell me her strategy on unsolicited dick picks was to respond with pictures of other dicks in shoes. Often coupled with comments akin to 'you couldn't pull off these stilettos, but maybe you could try a kitten heel.'

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vegans hate vegetarians? But they are vegetarians.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Disclosure: Am Vegan. Don't hate vegetarians.

I think it's because many Vegans perceive Vegetarians as going half the way and then stopping dead.

From a vegan perspective meat eaters are doing something morally wrong. But many have grown up that way and are conditioned into normalizing meat consumption. Many haven't questioned it ever, or reflexively defend it, because it is perceived as normal.

Vegetarians on the other hand seem to understand the problem of animals suffering. Many of them made an ethical decision not to eat meat... and then continue to contribute to animal suffering by consuming other animal products. Understanding that murder is bad and then deciding to commit it just a bit less directly, is a position many Vegans take as deeply harmful.

Personally i am grateful for every single animal saved. Reducing meat or going vegetarian are steps in a direcion i see as good and positive. In my ideal world we would all be Vegans, but i am grateful for every little step in that direction.

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Even just reducing our global meat consumption would make me so happy. Let it's insane to me that there is what amounts to my eyes as a wall of tortured flesh in every grocery store, and my tofus and veggie dogs take up like half of two shelves next to the fresh vegetables.

I can't wrap my head around eating meat every day, but there are people who eat meat at every meal.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not quite. Vegans don't eat any animal products of any kind. Vegetarians don't eat products that necessitate killing an animal to produce, but allow others. Note that these other products are usually from animals that will be killed for food, and that the animals that won't be murdered still also suffer.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Vegetarians don't eat meat. Hence vegans are vegetarian.

Ovo-lacto-vegetarians allow eggs and milk. This is the common type of vegetarian in the West.

Lacto-vegetarians allow milk, but not eggs. This is the common type of vegetarian in India.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Seems considerate? "We didn't want to annoy you with photos of something you despise so we created a separate channel to do just that but nothing else."

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Honestly that seems pretty thoughtful of them. Most people I know would give zero shits and just post all that on a chat with vegans and vegetarians. Some of them going out of their way to post them on that chat specifically.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ahhh the WhatsApp Paradox

For every chat group you're in, there is a separate group that exists without you in it

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

That's not a paradox, that's the group chat power set theorem

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 week ago

I would not be surprised if my old coworker-friends started a separate group chat without me after the nth, "Maybe you should come to one of these protests" and "Please at least read the wikipedia summary on this historical topic before you start going off about it" message from me.

They're fine people but they're also kind of very... apolitical.

[–] XM34@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Gone vegetarian 5 years ago just before the pandemic hit. I've never had any real issues so far and my friend group has mostly switched to vegetarian meals when I'm present. Not because anyone forced them, but because it's a lot easier and there's so much awesome vegetarian food nowadays.

And when we barbecue, everyone brings their own stuff anyway. So that's a non issue as well (I don't care about cross contamination at all)

I don't think I could go full vegan, but in all honesty, I save enough money from not buying meat that I can buy all of my milk and cheese organic and that got rid of pretty much every last one of my moral qualms.

spoilerQueue militant vegans telling me how awful even organic dairy is in 3, 2, 1...

[–] 9blb@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you became a vegetarian for ethical reasons, then buying organic milk doesn't solve any of the moral qualms connected to the dairy industry. The cow still gets (forcefully) impregnated, her calf still gets taken from her shortly after birth and both of them get killed once they are no longer economically viable.

[–] XM34@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I became a vegetarian for environmental reasons and I do think all animals deserve a dignified existance, but my criteria for that is obviously very different from yours.

Still though, it never ceases to amuse me how that forceful impregnation BS is still floating around with people who've never encountered a live animal in their entire life. How about you try getting a male and female pet and do a little study on how small the intervals in between litters really are.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Still though, it never ceases to amuse me how that forceful impregnation BS is still floating around

Are you saying cows are not impregnated forcefully? Because artificial impregnation is used regularly by dairy farmers. Even when not, the time of impregnation, either by natural methods or artificially, is carefully selected with best milk production in mind.

How about you try getting a male and female pet and do a little study on how small the intervals in between litters really are

For cows it's usually a dry period of 60 days, before they are impregnated again.

I'm not even sure what point you are trying to make here. Are you implying that wild cows would also be pregnatant as much as possible?

I'd be interested in what your criteria for a dignified existence are. For example, what is your stance on the separation of cow and calf? This happens in organic farming too. Regardless of the method of farming (organic or not) cows are slaughtered for meat at about 5 years of age, after bringing 2 or 3 calves into the world and about 15 years before their natural death. Do you regard that as a dignified existence?

[–] XM34@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My source is that my family owns an organic dairy farm and every single number you pulled is either wrong or out of context

  • Cows get pregnant about once per year. When we have an actual bull with the herd, that interval is even shorter because the bull won't consider milk production at all. He'll jump on as soon as he smells she's in heat.

  • There's nothing forceful about artificial insemination and every statement in that direction is extremist bullshit spread by Peta Terrorists and other lowlifes

  • Wild cows also get pregnant every year, yes. They need to produce as much offspring as possible so the herd doesn't die out and when there's a bull present and the cow goes into heat, then there's nothing stopping them.

  • Cows on organic farms often live into their teens and are usually only slaughtered when they develop severe health problems. Our oldest one is 16 years old as of last month and you can easily tell that she's an extremely old lady. Wild cows have a way shorter life expectancy because they get hunted down by predators or die of an infection as soon as they show any kind of weakness or old age.

  • A dignified existence for a cow is the ability to graze on fresh pastures, a roof over the head for bad weather, soft bedding for resting, a reasonablely sized herd for companionship and a painless death when her time has come.

  • Separation of cows and calves is your only argument that has any kind of merit, but honestly most cows take it pretty well. A lot of farmers are actually exploring concepts where mother and calf are kept together, but those usually result in higher maintenance cost and slightly lower milk yield. And customers are just not ready to pay the difference.

The thing that people like you always forget is that most farmers and especially organic farmers care a great deal about their kettles' wellbeing and some of you would do well to remember that.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hey, thanks for getting back to me. I'd be really interested in a follow up.

Let me start by stating that i am happy to learn more and don't ask to get a "got ya" out of you. It's great to have the possibility to talk to somebody who has real experience in the field (if you don't mind me further enquiring of course).

  • Cows get pregnant about once per year. When we have an actual bull with the herd, that interval is even shorter because the bull won't consider milk production at all. He'll jump on as soon as he smells she's in heat.

So cows have one or two calves a year, with a dry period of 60 days, while giving milk for the rest of the year.

  • There's nothing forceful about artificial insemination and every statement in that direction is extremist bullshit spread by Peta Terrorists and other lowlifes

I have to disagree here. Dairy farmers are impragnating cows, either via natural or artifical methods, to make a profit selling their milk. Impregnating another sentient being that cannot consent to it, for no other reason than to profit from them, is by definition forceful in my opinion. I'd even say it is forceful regardless of the physical force the act of impragnation requiers.

  • Wild cows also get pregnant every year, yes. They need to produce as much offspring as possible so the herd doesn't die out and when there's a bull present and the cow goes into heat, then there's nothing stopping them.

That's good to know. I suppose the herds size would be regulated trough predators. Most cows that exist in America and Europa wouldn't survive in the wild, because they have been bred into milk or meat producers, but it's good to know thad beeing pregnant is the norm for cows.

  • Cows on organic farms often live into their teens and are usually only slaughtered when they develop severe health problems. Our oldest one is 16 years old as of last month and you can easily tell that she's an extremely old lady. Wild cows have a way shorter life expectancy because they get hunted down by predators or die of an infection as soon as they show any kind of weakness or old age.

I'm really happy to hear this :) Since this reduces profit it really shows a genuine care about your families cows, since doing this while losing money must come out of respect and genuine care. e Is keeping cows alive into their teens or even late teens something only your family does or is it part of the general organic milk industry's standards?

  • A dignified existence for a cow is the ability to graze on fresh pastures, a roof over the head for bad weather, soft bedding for resting, a reasonablely sized herd for companionship and a painless death when her time has come.
  • Separation of cows and calves is your only argument that has any kind of merit, but honestly most cows take it pretty well. A lot of farmers are actually exploring concepts where mother and calf are kept together, but those usually result in higher maintenance cost and slightly lower milk yield. And customers are just not ready to pay the difference.

Thanks for being honest about me having a point. Personaly i think not beeing seperated from their children should be part of a dignified existance. Even if you think that they take it well, that can by it's nature only be an assumption.

I don't have time for a deep dive rn, but wikipedia seems to disagree with you (i know, not a great source):

May i ask what happens with the babys? I mean, you propaly can't afford to double your heard in size every year, that would run out of steam fast.

The thing that people like you [...]

People like me? Who are they?

[...]always forget is that most farmers and especially organic farmers care a great deal about their kettles' wellbeing and some of you would do well to remember that.

I don't know about that. I belive and hope that farmers care for their animals, and i can imagine that espeacialy organic farmers indeed do care about their animals. I believe that you see your family as caring about their cows.

Considering how most of the livestock we have is not held on organic farms but is mass produced cattle on large scale farms that do live under horrendous circumstances, i don't think that "most" farmers care about their animals as living beings that should be treated with respect. Maybe as an asset that has to be kept healthy enough to produce the desired product, but that often includes the very bare minimum of care (at least outside of organic farms).

[–] XM34@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wild cow herds are regulated by predators, but also by themselves. Like with most herd animals, males are either killed or exiled once they reach puberty.

On my parents farm we leave the calves with their mother for a day and then move the calves to their own enclosure nearby. If I had to guess, I'd say that the social contact with the other calves significantly reduces stress for the calves and the direct line of sight helps the mothers cope. But it really depends on the individual cow how well they take it.

As far as I'm aware organic farms often keep their cows for roundabout one decade given that their health allows it. Upper teens are rare because older cows are a lot more prone to develop serious health issues and most of the time it's more humane to slaughter a cow with a torn ligament than watching her die painfully from gas buildup.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks. How do you proceed with the calves after they are separated? Are they sold, killed, kept, etc? Does what happens to them depend on a calves sex?

[–] XM34@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Most male calves are sold into organic meat farms once they reach 6 months. As far as I know they're raised further till they're fully grown at around two years old. But I'm no expert on this. From time to time we keep one for the herd.

Female calves are either sold to other organic dairy farms or we keep them and raise them ourselves. No calf is killed except for medical emergencies.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once more, thanks.

Unfortunatly, this confirms what i suspected. Male cows, at the very least, are a byproduct of organic milk production. So consuming it still is contributing to animals being killed, albeit more indirectly.

For me, that is the red line i wouldn't want to cross.

I don't see how those male calves live a life in dignity, but i respect that your line is different from mine. Thanks again for giving me a glimpse into the industry, that was very informative.

[–] XM34@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As I said, I'm vegetarian mostly for environmental reasons and I'm okay with killing animals as long as they're allowed to live a dignified life and the killing is done in a humane way. Both of these are ensured by the EU-BIO regulations and even more so by the Bioland, Naturland and Demeter labels.

Again, for me a dignified life includes, access to fresh pastures, a herd and enough room and shelter for the animals. Meat cattle get all of those in organic farms and that's good enough for me.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

[...]the killing is done in a humane way. Both of these are ensured by the EU-BIO regulations [...]

There is, to the beat of my knowledge, no difference in the methods of slaughtering for conventional and organic cattle in the EU. They are processed seperatly, but that is the only regulation i know of. Happy to be corrected if you know something else.
Some organic farm slaughter animals on their own, to ensure a humane death, so there is that i guess.

Still, this is where our moral framework differs then, as i do see it as unethical to kill any being without need. For me the knowledge that an animal had a good life isn't enough.

For one i can't guarantee that it was a good life: maybe they were mistreated without any control instance realising it. And of course we can't ask them.

I wouldn't apply that standard to humans.If a human child is murdered by somebody i would never say: It's okay that they were killed, because they were a happy child with a good life. I don't see why i should change this view just because it's a non human animal beeing killed.

Differnt to many other vegans i am fine with you having a different moral position. I still think that i am right, but it is my truth. I have to and can live with different truths that contradict each other co-existing.

So, no hate from my side. I sincerely thank you for the information you have shared here, i have learned some things and feel that i have a better grasp of the matter at hand, while still feeling validated in my previous position. Thank you.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's is absurd to discuss consent from a cow. do you ask locks for consent before you force your keys in them?

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't, since locks are inanimate objects that lack the ability to feel and think. Do those qualities apply to cows too?

I sincerely hope that you think humans should be asked for consent before impregnating them. But you don't seem to think this applies to cows. What qualitie(s) does a cow lack, that a human animal has, to justify this distinction?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

consent must be informed. since cattle cannot be informed, they are identical to locks in matters of consent.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

consent must be informed.

Says who?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's the definition of consent. if we don't agree about this, we can't discuss consent at all

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

collapsed inline media

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consent

The word informed isn't even brought up here. And looking for "informed consent" i only get things related to medical procedures.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

if we don't agree about this, we can't discuss consent at all

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Holly seeing the comments on this post is crazy and some people would do good to touch some grass.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was hoping to read a collection of people's group chat incidents. This sucks.

[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meatheads love to ruin everything.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you actually pay attention you can see the meatheads started every argument.

So shut the fuck up.

[–] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see a total of two shitheads commenting live bait and for every one of those, at least three people are shitting on them when they could've just downvoted and moved on.

If your point is "who's starting it" rather than who's fueling it, it's disingenuous and overly generous.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I should be able to post but you shouldn't be able to reply"

[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Exactly. These idiots post offensive shit with no other point than harassment, then cry like babies to the mods when people tell them to fuck off.

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Ikr.

It's a meme... Laugh. Or don't?