this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
388 points (99.2% liked)

News

32964 readers
5828 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A simple Microsoft 365 Roadmap update will now generate a raft of unhappy headlines. The idea is simple. “When users connect to their organization's Wi-Fi, Teams will automatically set their work location to reflect the building they are working in.”

Forget the locational anonymity of a Teams virtual background. Teams will update your location when connected to your company’s WiFi. On video, you may have your usual background complete with company logo. But your boss will know you’re not in work.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 95 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Glad I work at a place that wouldn't give a fuck as long as I'm getting shit done. This sort of bullshit undermines how people feel about work and likely harms productivity more than it helps (as is tradition with micromanaging people instead of setting them up for success and giving them the space they need to do their job).

Also, people who actually are slacking will find so many ways around this anyhow that it won't actually matter to them because they already don't care and are probably smart enough to get around it.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a lot of ways, I have the opposite of micromanagement, they really don't care what the hell I am doing as long as I'm delivering my projects effectively.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like you work at a place that trusts you to do the job you were hired to do.

My take is: If they don't trust me, wtf am I even doing at a such a fucked up place? Then find a better place to work.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The sad thing is that some orgs that start off with healthy environments can slowly erode into really toxic environments and it's like a frog boiling in water.

Sometimes it can happen very quickly - all it takes is one person of enough prominence being replaced with another, and something that took years to cultivate is shredded in weeks/months.

Unfortunately, I've seen both of these happen up close and personal. Sometimes it's not always a viable option to try to pick up and move to another job...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

In my current job, I don't mind doing a little overtime or working a weekend every now and than. They don't care what I do, as long as it gets done. They don't care that I go to the gym during office hours. I'm happy and I'm passionate about my work.

But if they started doing shit like this. I'd be working 9 to 5 and not giving a shit if work gets done or not. I'd become a drone and I'd be looking for other employment.

Fancy that? Don't you love it when your work treat you like...wait for it... an Adult. Rewarded accordingly, help accountable accordingly. Who'd 've thought! 🤔

[–] BoloMKXXVIII@piefed.social 73 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Jokes on them! My company made everyone remote during COVID. It worked so well that they sold the corporate office buildings. We are all remote permanently! As long as I work my scheduled hours, they don't care where in the world I am.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

We JUST did this. I work in commercial real estate and we talked about it in 2018 but management chickened out. After the Pandemic, they forced us to go back for a year but moral fell to the lowest point ever and we couldn’t hire anyone.

Finally, it was time to decide on renewing our lease again and we switched back to remote. It’s been awesome and we’ve hired tons of people from our competitors who are pushing in office mandates.

I hope everyone keeps pushing their office to change. It’s possible.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Lucky bastard

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

This is definitely a step in the right direction, but why stop there? They should be paying you for getting work done to some agreed-upon standard, regardless of whether that takes 40 hours a week or far less.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hold on. Let me say this.

If your boss cares more about where you are doing your work, than if your work is getting completed, you need a new boss.

I work in IT support and I'll say that this isn't really anything that couldn't be done before, is just more visible. Office 365 logs what device and app you're using to connect, the IP address of the requester, what you were requesting from which service... The list is long. It's a massive amount of data that largely, nobody cares about.

The only time I even look at that information is when some security software flags some action as suspicious, then, and only then, do I even bother.

If you go on vacation and suddenly connect from Florida when you are normally connecting from the UK, I get a notification. If you suddenly start using a well known VPN, I get a notification. The logic is for security. If you suddenly log in from a new place, then it's more likely that the login in question wasn't you, and you've been hijacked. That's literally my only interest in your location. Most bosses don't give a shit either.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If your boss cares more about where you are doing your work, than if your work is getting completed, you need a new boss.

Sure, in principle. Getting a new boss though... do you have any extra lobs laying around?

I work in IT

Aaaand here we go, of course you thought finding a new job was a viable alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao any corporate IT department can do this at any time anyways

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the IT stuff made a log of it, but I think teams is promising to actually rat on you. Like, if it detects it, it'll send a notice to the boss that you're being remote

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Are people just not going into the office without telling anyone? Like, who is this actually affecting?

Also, if they have to VPN into their company network, like assume many do, won't that register as being in the office anyway?

[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd view it as more of the opposite: a tool built into the Teams suite to tattle on who isn't complying with Return to Office policies.

VPNs would depend a bit on configuration. I know my ubiqiti router will let me dump VPN traffic into its own vlan (with dedicated IP range), so it would absolutely be possible to tell it apart from local traffic. At the same time, I'm pretty sure my workplace has all site network traffic VPN'd to the home office, so I'm not if the same logic would apply...

[–] bobaworld@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trust me, if your employer wants to know if you've been coming into the office or not, they can easily find out without needing Microsoft Teams to tell them about it. They can see what IP address your machine is connecting from. And if you work in a building with secure access they could also just pull your badge-in history to find out if you're actually there or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 27 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Teams is already such a bloated fucking mess of an application.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well i guess i am lucky because my laptop remains on site and i connect to vdi and then rdp to my laptop. (When working from home) so the data will be meaningless. At least in my case.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That particular data is meaningless in all cases

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As always it's the worst product that got the most marketing that gets used by everyone.

This is why we can't have nice things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I am glad I work where nobody monitors teams because that would be stupid.

But exactly how will this work for the people who are actually using modern computing? So I am on Azure Virtual Desktop for one instance of teams, and another that I use for calls on a personal laptop, maybe on their wifi but always with a VPN because we habitually run vpns.

So where am I?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Meanwhile, they cannot or will not add useful features like....being able to have more than one fucking person share a screen. This is after YEARS of lockdown.

And don't get me started on how basic their chat "feature" is. I mean....have they even bothered to look at Slack at all? And it's not like Slack is the only one they might look at...how about Matrix/Riot?

Nope, it's almost like they just know millions of users are stuck with their craptastic solution because it's bundled into the rest of their stack and enterprises are going with it no matter how much it sucks balls.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Microsoft's products are no longer usable.

Not safe, not sensible, not smart.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope Teams announces when my CEO and other executives are not in the office. Just to level the field.

Hah, it will almost certainly have admin options that allow high level people to turn off that feature.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Teams is trash, electron is a miscarriage of an idea, and M$ is totally morally bankrupt.

Shocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Another feature no one asked for.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Oh, this was asked for, I assure you.

Not by workers, but it was asked for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here I am working remote in my basement like a dumb motherfucker when I could have been anywhere else

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think the takeaway from this article, and I may be wrong, is that Teams uses location to report where you're logging in from. This is something most corporate networks report anyway for safety.

This isn't a big deal for the vast majority of Work From Home employees. Most have home offices, and most will make their team or managers aware if they're logging in from a new location, or everyone is using a robust VPN to connect anyway so it hardly matters.

This is going to fuck over people who are exploiting WFH to say, work two jobs (Yes, it is more common than you think) or people who went on vacation with their family and didn't want to take PTO so they are trying to log in to join team meetings from the hotel lobby or something.

If your company is so draconian about your login location and you're hiding where you're working from, maybe consider changing habits or changing employer.

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is going to fuck over people who are exploiting WFH to say, work two jobs

can you explain how this would catch people working two jobs esp if they are both WFH jobs?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well. I’m remote. So they know I’m not at work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, Microsoft never had "Don't be evil" as their motto.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 days ago (12 children)

So people will know in which company building you're in? Who gives a shit lol

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] waspentalive@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

The company your work for is Microsoft's biggest client - not you.. Not even you if you use Windows on your own home computer. Use Linux at home, use Linux at work if you can.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

And somehow their implementation of e911 will still not work.

[–] Seditious_Delicious@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

hahaha I love how ass hat CxOs VPxs still believe that people at a desk in an office means work gets done.... lol. I see people at their desks still achieving diddly squat.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's more about control than it is about productivity. Has been for a long time.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mostly work from home ever since Covid. But I live reasonably close to the office and go in every once in a while. Usually it's for something like "team building" or meeting some people deemed "VIPs" (lol) or whatever the fuck. It's not always voluntary.

I have to mentally steel myself for getting very little done on days when I'm in the office. And nearly everyone else I work with does the same thing. It actually adds to the stress because that work load doesn't get any lighter for not being able to get to it.

The reason for all the lack of work? Well, there are longer in-person lunches. There are all the impromptu "pop-ins", the hallway chats, the talk while waiting for some coffee, the extra meetings on the schedule because "in person", etc...all that adds up to very little planned work getting moved forward. You might say there are the benefits of catching up and the occasional serendipity from a random snatch of conversation you eavesdropped on, etc.

While doing this a few times a year might have some benefits (but hard to quantify), I'm quite sure it's not worth doing every day, so I don't. Thankfully I have the option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Teams/outlook has been doing this for a while. This is likely more for making it easier to see who is in the office to coordinate in person stuff like meetings and lunch.

If you want to be creeped out by Teams and other similar services, it can

  • Detect if a conference room is in use even when not being used for a teams/zoom call.
  • detect your voice and attach it to a transcript.
  • detect your face to assign you name to a teams meeting in a conference room with other people in the room.
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Maybe I’m dating myself, but it still seems incredible to me that a relatively small update to the location features in one piece of software triggers news articles about the broader societal implications.

Software has too much power over our lives.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Maybe, but M$ has had quite an impact over office life for quite some time, and it seems like nearly every org is still paying the M$ tax, even after all these years. Teams is part of that stack, and while I don't know anyone tech-savvy that actually likes it for anything it supposedly solves, it gets used anyway. It is terrible as an IM client. Only one user at a time can share a screen, so it's terrible at any real collab, also. But it integrates with Outlook for scheduling meetings, so....

In addition, it seems like it is almost intentionally user-hostile when it comes to setting up prefs, like disabling incoming video as a default. This is a feature I've seen asked for over 5 years ago. When everyone was stuck at home and sometimes on rather slow/unreliable networks, Microsoft makes you disable incoming video on every single new Teams session, from all the geniuses that felt they were important enough to have their camera on all the time for no real reason.

Now you'd think they would have adapted to something like this, and turned this around very quickly at the beginning of Covid, as not only was it requested from users, but it would make a lot of sense (and maybe it lightens their servers load, too? Although I imagine video feeds don't get streamed through their servers?) and probably be a decent workaround to having audio properly work on slow/bursty network connections, etc.

And yet....I still don't see the feature as an option. I think I saw an answer about some setting that could be done globally or in a policy, as if that is really the answer. Again, it seems like it is software aimed at being sold to control freaks who also care nothing about the user experience of their captured user base. So, 5 years later, I get to disable incoming video on each call if some inconsiderate person has their video on.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

And it's a terrible piece of software at that.

[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Why would it matter that Teams knows where you are working? If you need to hide from your coworkers or your boss then maybe it's time to change company?

On the other hand: if Teams is using Wifi to correlate your position you could mess with it by exchanging the access point positions, ie exchange your bosses AP with the one in the cellar.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I actually wouldn't mind this at all. Where I work, we have an office but most people are only in one or two days a week. I try to keep to a schedule, but some weeks I have to move my office days around. When my schedule changes, I update my Teams location so people know where I am, but I wouldn't mind opting in to do it automatically.

But then again, my boss doesn't really care where I do my work, as long as it gets done. Not everyone has the luxury of a boss who isn't an asshat. If you are working in a place where you have to hide your work-from-home time, you should be looking for a new job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Sounds useful? Weird to imply the purpose of this is to expose people not in the office. The people who care about that already know.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›