this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
125 points (98.4% liked)

News

32981 readers
2883 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump has filed an appeal to overturn his May 2024 criminal conviction in the hush-money payment case, arguing he is shielded by presidential immunity.

Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records by a unanimous jury in New York.

In December, citing Trump's imminent return to the White House, a New York judge sentenced Trump to an unconditional discharge, meaning he would not serve time or pay a fine.

"This case should never have seen the inside of a courtroom, let alone resulted in a conviction," Trump's lawyers said in the latest filing.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Ridiculous. He wasn't president when the crime occurred, he wasn't president when the trial happened.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Nor was it an "official act"

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'll be happy to be proven wrong, ecstatic even, but watch as he gets his way because the judiciary is too chicken shit to uphold 'all men are equal under the law'.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All men are equal under the law, it's just that apparently Trump is above the law :(

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

All men are equal. Unfortunately this influential sack of lard doesn't qualify as one.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's been awhile since I was reading about this when it first came up, but I believe part of the issue is his "presidential immunity" would have made how some of the evidence was obtained no longer valid given the immunity. It's all BS.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Remember when even having a criminal charge against you was disqualifying for the presidency?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Or being a pedophile that rapes children.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I miss the days when things like condiment choice and suit colors were among the more controversial things.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Oh don't worry. They're still releasing breaking news stories that the family member Mamdani referred to as "auntie" is actually his elder cousin. The scandal!

[–] PoundCake2@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

OMG! The brown suite. I forgot about that.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Can we appeal the sentencing (or absolute lack of)?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

ELI5: Why is this even of interest to him? If he ignores it, it has already gone away. If he brings it up, it returns to public attention. what a dipshit weirdo!

[–] paranoid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

He's petty and doesn't remember who was president when the events took place. I imagine he'll argue immunity is retroactive

Just more rage baiting. His order of importance is: make himself more powerful, make his rich backers more powerful, piss off liberals.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

He wants a ccw

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Does this open the possibility for a less-corrupt judge to revisit sentencing, rather than the dishonorable Juan M Merchan’s shameful non-sentence?