this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
832 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

17268 readers
697 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 226 points 1 week ago
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 164 points 1 week ago (4 children)

FWIW I heard the show was extremely bad, and I had to see for myself.

It is very, very bad.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 193 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the worst parts of it is that Scooby Doo has had tons of successful series and they've all been pretty good. Yet they somehow managed to fuck this up despite it being an incredibly simple formula for a show.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It was never about Scooby Doo. IIRC, this was supposed to be an original show, but latching it to a successful 90s franchise must have looked like a sure money maker.

Edit: did some fact checking, this was a theory. The show actually was an unfortunate reimagining of Scooby Doo since its inception.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Regardless of what the official story is, that's probably what really happened. Same thing with the Halo tv show.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don’t know. Seeing how modern shows like Foundation, The Witcher, or Star Trek Discovery, to name a few, have gratuitously walked over their own canon, I can understand how the producers thought Velma was a good idea for a new Scooby Doo show.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think Discovery is a little different. They had way too many producers and writers on that show, all trying to get their little ideas in so when they moved onto a new project, they could get a sexy "By the creators of Star Trek" tagline on it. The situation Walter Mosley described when he left STD made the writer's room sound like a viper pit.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plus the first two seasons basically had the producers get fired, and a new person brought in partway through.

That would be bad for any show.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philophilsaurus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Scooby-doo is a 90s franchise now?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it was designed as ragebait. but it failed even at that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

FWIW I heard the show was extremely bad, and I had to see for myself.

It was okay, better than the shitty Netflix adult animations. The worst part of it was the Velma character, if they got rid of or changed her it would be better.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BodePlotHole@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (4 children)

A negative boy was unsure about a radical party.

The boy was a square, so he missed out on four awesome chicks.

And the whole thing was over by 2am...

This is beautiful, as a mathematics major it brought me to tears. I’ll be reading this at my wedding

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I was just taught it to "pop goes the weasel".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm terrible at making math jokes, but I don't have any proofs.

[–] Marz157@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Same here, but I'll suck it up and make one if I halve two.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Coming from someone that memorized it in high school and hasn't used it since, I am enraged.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's a formula very useful for a tone of engineering fields, electronic, mechanics, automatic control and probably a bunch more. I used it a tone in my early carrier, including the imaginary flavor.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah if your field uses anything beyond basic math this bitch is hiding somewhere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

When I started Chem engineering in college, it blew me away that like 80% of lab math and analisis was just using the linear equation everyone bitched and moaned about how useless it was in high-school.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 36 points 1 week ago

When stupid people try to make a show about smart people.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Such an strange error. I'm not saying it's AI but here's my prompt:

Generate a picture of someone thinking and, to symbolize their thought process, show math symbols and equations around their head, these symbols have to include the quadratic formula

Here's the pic:

collapsed inline media1761354151808

[–] m0stlyharmless@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I suspect it’s an OCR error.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I'm guessing a typesetter was too lazy to add another textbox and although they knew how to type "√", didn't realize "²" is in Unicode too. They added a horizontal line as separate graphics to extend the square root symbol but only realized too late the whole thing is in a fraction: maybe someone reminded them and they misinterpreted the advice, or just decided not to split the text box to put the nominator higher.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I stared at the square of the square root of the squared square root for far too long...

that I almost missed the obvious E = / * A. Where would the field of mathematics be without that good old E = / * A? :-D

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did they use AI to generate that?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Neural Network (bad one)

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

didn't get an animation job for the math skills

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Those guys all work on Futurama.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

... Why not just copy the meme they're referencing? It's like they're intentionally trying to screw this up.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

why is she even thinking about this?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

She’s in high school in the show.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

collapsed inline media

I feel for Velma. I am so bad at math that sometimes I go into a corner by myself so I can hide what I'm working on from my coworkers while I scribble down very complex maladaptive strategies I've learned to solve simple calculations.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wrong formula aside, what is the meaning of dividing an entire equation? (x = b) / a

[–] Crazazy@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

quotient equivalence under an equivalence relation "a" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotient_type

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

If you told me the creator of that show didn't get the equation right because they had no idea what it was even called to look it up, I would believe you.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Animation software didn't have superscript, so no power ofs.

load more comments
view more: next ›