this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47425 readers
2455 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Im out of the loop on this. Why does the US want greenland?

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't want Greenland, I just want you to stop bombing kids and work on our Healthcare. Why on the fuck are you even looking at Greenland????

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Please, Europe, just take this as a declaration war and attack the US now to nip this in the bud.

The sooner this child is stopped, the sooner the world can improve.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kind of the whole point of nuclear dissuasion is that we are not, in fact, going to ever do that. And ignoring the existence of nukes (lol), attacking the US on their hometurf is such a monumentally stupid idea people still wonder what went through the Japanese High Command's mind 80 years ago.

Stop asking Europe for help, because you're not getting it. You've alienated your allies and broken your democracy beyond repair. Either use that 2nd amendment of yours to the fullest extent of its spirit or STFU with the "pwease stop him we're scawed :(((" rhetoric. We have way more reasons to be scared because we don't live next door to white cishet male Americans to shield us from his madness. Stop with the victim blaming. Either you stop this child or he starts a war with your assent.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If Trump was only an America problem, I would say the same thing you are saying.

I'm fine if the world attacks the US just enough so that Trump recedes to only the US.

What I am saying is that if Trump is making threats to the world, the world should take it seriously and deal with it now instead of letting him push boundaries without repercussions. His threats are going to just get bigger and hurt more people than when the threats are smaller.

The world needs to be on guard and protect itself.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All of a sudden the conservative rhetoric is that indigenous Greenlanders are mistreated by the Danes and that’s unfair; they need America’s help.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

That's such transparently stupid bullshit. If they believed that they'd start by helping indigenous Americans. It sickens me that so many people are idiotic enough to either believe this or just not care.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thinking about why the US is so keen on Greenland: It's only relevant for them if they intend to make enemies out of the EU, because they already have all the access they need. But only as long as they are allied with Europe.

It's clear where this is headed. Russia is not the only reason why Europe is rearming.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is also why he wants an ICBM defense mesh, because realistically that's the only chance Europe has to cripple us in a fight.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Hardly. There are many ways to "cripple" the US without need to resort to a simple-minded military slugfest.

They could act to support Trump's next reelection bid, for example. That'd be more devastating to American power than a nuke.

[–] nirodhaavidya@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Try as I may to avoid this absurd political reality I find myself in, I am continuously dumbfounded by these headlines. I have to check everytime if the post is an Onion article.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The Onion needs to start publishing articles that discuss trump doing really positive things.

“Trump pledges to increase taxes on billionaires and eliminate their tax loopholes”

“Trump apologizes for renaming the Gulf of Mexico, pledges to undo damage”

“Trump calls on the senate to pass bill that criminalizes insider trading in congress”

“Trump removes all foreign tariffs, making a plea to restore trade deals with the US”

“Trump signed an executive order to forgive all student debt”

Now THAT would be some serious satire.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

When the hell will the military arrest this stinky Orange Turd as an enemy to the state?

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If he actually orders an invasion of Greenland I'd put the odds at around 12%. My guess is around 60% the military will refuse to carry out the order (it would be after all in violation of the War Powers Resolution unless congress approves), then 80% chance Trump will back down. Of course that's if he gives the order, my guess of that is around 30%, reducing the odds of a greenland-related coup to around 4%. In reality the most likely path is that once the military explains to Trump that they want congressional approval, he'll lose interest and go on to scaring us some other way.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Complicity tends to be the norm until things get really bad.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

While Hedgeseth runs the Pentagon? Never.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He just announced foreign vehicle tariffs and there is a huge scandal brewing around the Signal thing. If the media stays on the Signal leak it could become a Watergate-sized problem.

So, Trump hit the "distract them with Greenland" button. He couldn't use the "distract them with Canada is a state" button again, he used that one for the Social Security thing last week.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think it’s really dangerous to keep dismissing the Greenland talk as a distraction. We have learned the lesson dozens of times before not to dismiss anything he says because it’s just “crazy talk.”

Taking control of Greenland and Canada would give a US-Russian alliance complete control over the Arctic circle, which has been a tactical goal of Putin’s for decades.

The day could come very soon when the US will take military action against Europe on behalf of Russian interests, and the rest of the world should take it seriously and prepare.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Every time an American claims something is just a distraction I get more annoyed. Threats of invading sovereign nations is not just a distraction. It’s pretty fucking alarming as a citizen of one of those nations and the dismissal of it is offensive

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's all crazy talk until the flights of American troops and equipment start landing for an occupation force.

Scary times ahead for all, and Americans will struggle the most.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

and Americans will struggle the most.

I keep trying to encourage Americans to put in the effort to stop Trump and his sycophants/minions from escalating this trade war into a shooting war.

So far they either ask me for a detailed plan to save their country from itself or say its pointless to even try...

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't understand.

People, everyday Americans don't matter at all.

The trade war will destroy him, not because it hurts regular Americans, but because it hurts the rich and pisses them off and nobody messes with their meal ticket.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The trade war appears to be about market manipulation. And sewing distrust of America. By repeatedly flip flopping they can buy and sell and make a killing in the markets. His wealthy allies are in on it and won't care at all.

This is what he was elected to do and it won't hurt him at all with the people who matter.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's about dividing the West so the oligarchs, all the oligarchs everywhere, can take control.

Stupid oligarchs, China knows no such rules.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

That's what I intended with sewing distrust. It certainly looks like market manipulation to me as well though.