I think you are greatly overestimating the basic functional knowledge of the general public...
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
348 points (95.8% liked)
Technology
68187 readers
3703 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If you think the average person understands watts, you live in a bubble, straight and simple. You have a very skewed notion of the average person.
Yep that video is leagues beyond most peoples capabilities to understand. Thinking they already knew and understood it is crazy.
Nah, the video is pretty straightforward, but it's presented in a way that most people would lose interest unless they're actually into the subject matter. I see three problems with the video:
- it's too long
- very few analogies
- mostly a talking head
Power vs energy is fairly simple with a good explanation. Power is simply the speed at which energy gets used up. For example:
- if you make a big campfire, it'll use up your wood (energy) faster
- if you're playing games on your phone, your battery (energy) will die sooner
- if you sprint, you'll use up your energy faster than if you jog
That's extremely intuitive. All a regular person needs to know is that simple concept, plus a way to measure it (the Kill-a-watt example). Boom, 5-10 min video.
But the talking head made it way more complicated by starting with gas. That's just belabouring the point that you can increase or decrease power, which is already intuitive with batteries or things we can see (wood) or feel (tiredness).
They could then segue into gas, once the power vs energy issue is established. A can of butane is like a battery, and the valve (e.g. screen brightness, game vs texting) controls how quickly it's used. We can compare gas and electricity directly because electricity can be turned directly into heat, just like gas can.
And then you segue into heat pumps. Basically explain how your AC/fridge works (i.e. moves heat instead of creating "cold"). Make a demo where you move heat vs create heat and show how much energy is used. As in, heat a room from 72F or whatever to 90F, one using a heat pump and the other using a space heater. Show how temps compare on both sides of the heat pump vs space heater (other rooms shouldn't change w/ space heater). Then use that to show a real-world example of a house that swapped from furnace to heat pump to really drive the point home that moving heat is more efficient than creating it.
This is way beyond majority of peoples capabilities. Everything in your post and his video is, both are long too. Majority of people just do not care, otherwise we'd all be engineers.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Do it, it teaches you things.
Most of your power isn't going where you think.
Oh I love this stuff.
My dishwasher pulls over 1000W, but overall actual usage pales in comparison to my server cluster, which utilizes a multiple 35W mini PCs.
I started measuring a bunch of things in February (using zigbee-compatible smart plugs to HA), so here is a graph of the above for the entire month of March:
It was eye opening, to say the least.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I moved into a tiny home and got one for measuring the current draw of my kitchen appliances and keeping track of the cost of my electric space heater ($40/month so far, yeesh)
load more comments
(2 replies)
In here absolutely everyone knows this stuff and it's all just common knowledge.
Absolutely not. Not even close.
lot of people from the US with gas grid (which we don’t really have around here), is it really so that your Joe Average can’t tell the difference between 1kWh of heat produced by gas compared to electricity
Right, because for most people gas is metered and sold by the CCF, and not converted into kW at any point in the chain.
So I know i used 30ccf last month, but there's zero indication what that is in kW, because we usually don't convert between the meter (which is volumetric) and the billing, which could be anything but why bother?
Reticulated gas is charged by the kWh here in New Zealand. The meter may well be calibrated in m³ (I don't have gas at home, so I don't know for sure) but all pricing is energy, not volume.
For bonus points, if instead you buy your gas in cylinders - a pair of 45kg (~100lb) cylinders is a common installation for houses without piped gas - those are sold simply by the unit. The best conversion for that I can find is one energy retailer describing one 45kg cylinder as 2200MJ (611kWh).
I expect this is one of those things that is overall horribly inconsistent depending on where you live.
Also from Europe, gas is measured/billed in kWh here as well.
Not everywhere, in Lithuania they charge per m³.
haven't seen it so far, but technology connections will always get an upvote.
also consider subscribing to his channel, his videos are amazing.
is it really so that your Joe Average can’t tell the difference between 1kWh of heat produced by gas compared to electricity?
Yup.
I totally understand electricity because it's pretty intuitive. Everything is advertised in watts, my bill comes as kilowatt hours, so it's pretty easy to calculate how much energy something uses by plugging in a kill-a-watt and measuring it.
My gas is billed in therms. I don't really know what that is, nor do I know what the flow rate is for my furnace or gas stove, so I have no concept for how much energy I'm using. I don't have an electric one to compare with, so I that's not an option either. So how exactly would I get to the point where I would be able to compare the two without a lot of annoying testing? Even then it would be extremely imprecise.
And no, it's not "watt hours coming out of the grid," except in the pedantic sense that they can be converted. They come from very different sources, so it's like comparing an EV to a horse, and while you could, it's completely nonsensical.
But yes, at some base level your average American knows there's a connection between the two (after all, I can choose between electric heat/heat pump and a gas furnace), but they'd rely on an expert to estimate the monthly price difference between options, since that's ultimately what we care about. The problem is mentioned near the end of the video, HVAC experts don't seem that familiar w/ heat pumps, so you may not get a decent estimate, depending on who your technician is. And that adds to the misinformation.
In here absolutely everyone knows this stuff and it’s all just common knowledge.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Power is water throughput in a pipe, energy is water filling a bucket. Simplest way I've found to explain it in my 15 years in the energy space.
Power is a measurement of the velocity and volume of water flowing through a pipe at a given instant*
I'm so sorry, I am officially 'that guy', taking a simple analogy and making it annoying...
I think it's simple enough without even using analogies to explain. The unit Watt is Joules per second. Multiply by units of time and you get the total units of energy in Joules. Watt and Watt Hour are just that with without the additional units showing or being simplified.
Follow-up video idea: speed ≠ distance
The one that I think more people misunderstand is temperature Vs heat Vs something feeling hot/cold. One is a property, one is energy, and the other is the transfer of energy.
You know a nation of people who may not be able to articulate their understanding, but definitely have a high intuitive understanding of that?
We Finns.
100C sauna and no problem sitting on wood, but happen to touch something metal and oooh-weee.
Also same thing happens the others way around when it's - 20c outside. I don't think there's many people in Finland who don't have a core memory of what cold metal tastes like in winter, because of the resulting trauma. And it doesn't even need to be metal to stick.
Nicely explained.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Saved you a click: power = rate of energy use (energy/time)
He says it so many times in so many ways that he actually starts to make it seem more complex than it is. You start wondering if you’re missing something, because you got it in 6 seconds but 12 minutes later he’s still talking about it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I sometimes make a conscious effort to understand electricity. For a few days, I then think I understand what's going on and then promptly I forget.
(Yes, I shall watch this video.)
kW/kWh aren't commonly used outside of electrical applications in the US, so people are less readily able to quantify and compare in other contexts. Looking at a variety of natural gas companies' bills, you'll get volume multiplied by a therm factor instead of simply using kWh; horsepower for not just cars but even electrical motors and pumps.
I think the average person will have looked at their electricity bill and put the basics together about watts and watt hours. As for comparison with natural gas, I think he didn't touch on the real metric people then turn to- cost. Depending on the state it can be much cheaper to use gas vs electricity.
Yeah, electric motors are what I notice the most. Be it on washers/dryers, garbage disposals (which range from 1/3, 1/2, 3/4, 1HP) and more.
There's no way even 1% of people understand this in the world. Maybe 1% know of those measurements "existence" asking them what they are would get an "uhh"
In the world? Me and millions of other people got this info in middle school physics. Sure, maybe we mostly forgot the details by now. But it's not arcane or ancient knowledge lost to time. It's in your electricity bill every month. A quick visit to Wikipedia and I got the gist of it back. Every single physicist, engineer, and electrician got this explained again to them.
"a quick visit to wikipedia" is a good example confirming what I said, majority of people are not willing to do that to learn any subject. 0.483% of humans are engineers, of that I'd say there are a small chunk that are near worthless and probably don't even know these basics.
load more comments
(3 replies)
After watching the video it was a bit over explained. I think he got his point across in the first 10 minutes, though I am an engineer by trade.
I appreciate his rigour in explaining and it is a good refresher on the power/energy calculations.
Also check out his other video on his Connextras channel where he basically suggests dismantling capitalism.
So I’m just wondering if this is really any new information for anyone.
It's never wise to underestimate most people's ignorance.
is it really so that your Joe Average can’t tell the difference between 1kWh of heat produced by gas compared to electricity?
Most people don't even know what a watt or watt/hour is. And have no idea how energy from gas relates to energy from electricity.
watt/hour
Oh yeah I've seen that used before, makes me cringe every time.
Anyway, do must people not go to high school? Or is stuff like that not part of the physics curriculum in some places?
A W/h either is a big problem or will be soon.
I mean that depends on the sign of the W/h as well as your W/h^2^ and higher orders too. Maybe you're actually approaching zero watts :P
Even if it was covered in high school, I think because most people never use it again in daily life it's easy to forget.
load more comments
(7 replies)
He’s making a point about instantaneous versus overall energy use, which it sounds like you already understand. “Power” and “energy” are already kind of loose terms, which could make that conversation confusing IMO.
But for anyone confused by this:
For the typical energy consumer, Watts (W, kW) are relevant when considering circuit capacity. Otherwise, Watt-hours (Wh, kWh) is likely the metric you’re looking for when considering energy use.
Concretely, your coffee maker might pull 1.2 kW while in use, more than most appliances in your house, yet it probably represents a minuscule portion of your electric bill, perhaps less than 1 kWh, since it only needs to boil a small amount of water with each use.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Full disclosure, I didn't watch the video yet, but it's likely a difference of environmental impact.
He's described in previous videos how burning gas at home is less efficient from the standpoint of a carbon footprint. I imagine this video is to help explain everything in a way that helps you come to that conclusion yourself. Teach a man to fish instead of just giving a fish and what not. So you can apply the knowledge to other things in your life
People complaining about this video have clearly not watched much Technology Connections; I enjoyed it immensely. It's right in line with how Alec normally does his videos. We who are loyal to the Great Alec expect the pedantic content.
view more: next ›