this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
437 points (99.5% liked)

News

32540 readers
3494 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Millions of federal workers won't get paid during a government shutdown. But the people who could prevent or end a shutdown — members of Congress — will still receive a paycheck.

That’s because their pay is protected under Article I, Section 6 of the Constitution, which states: “The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States.”

The Constitution “says members will be paid,” Rep. Joe Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, explained to reporters Tuesday.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@mander.xyz 78 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

It should be noted that not getting paid during a government shutdown would disproportionately negatively affect Democrats in the House, many of whom rely on that income. More House Republicans are independently wealthy.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 28 points 23 hours ago

And, in theory, they are actively working to restart the government.

Like most things with the US (and, honestly, most countries) government, it is all based upon people acting "honorably" and in good faith.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

And besides party lines, you really don't want policies that only really punish politicians who haven't grifted.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It really varies by state and department.

Plenty of red states have stacked their bureaucracies with loyal Republican apparatchiks. They'll be hit as hard as anyone else.

More House Republicans are independently wealthy.

Vanishingly few Congresscritters are anything resembling poor. You need a certain excess of free time and wealth just to attempt to run. And you need a large body of wealthy friends to finance your campaign.

The idea that Nancy Pelosi and Dick Durbin can't weather this storm because they're Democrats is absurd.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You'll notice I said "many" and not "all."

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You’ll notice I said “many”

I'll spot you "a few".

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

many of whom rely on that income

Keep in mind, it's a 6-figure salary and they'd rather live a higher quality of life than save or invest that money for later.

It's not about needs, it's about wants. These people are all richer than us.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

for those curious it's $174,000 per annum for members of the House and Senate. according to rentcafe and numbeo the average price for an apartment just under 800 sq ft a month is about $2500. Other cost of living expenses are on par with other major cities.

They're fine. This doesn't include other benefits and kick backs and what have you which I imagine they all get plenty of.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 14 hours ago

the average price for an apartment just under 800 sq ft a month is about $2500

That's usually a second home they're paying for, because most of them have places to live and families in their respective states when not in session. Does the federal government reimburse for flights back and forth from their home to DC? Because there are a lot of those too

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

This is how it's always worked.

If members of congress were not paid, the richer members could use a shutdown to coerce the poorer members, knowing that they have enough saving to survive the payment stop longer than poorer members. In a government where shutdowns are possible, continuing to pay representatives is necessary.

In a proper country, a shutdown would result in an immediate recall and disbarment of every elected official. But we don't live in a proper country.

Continuing to pay those responsible for the shutdown is a bad thing. Punishing every other government worker for someone else's ineptitude is bad. But on balance not paying congress would probably be just a bit worse.

[–] Steelpan@lemmy.world 34 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

In a proper country there are no government shutdowns.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 19 points 21 hours ago

A government shutting down is a failed state. That never should happen, and if it happens, safeguards should be implemented ASAP so it can’t happen again.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

This is 100% correct. In most civilised countries, if a yearly budget cannot be approved, the whole cabinet gets disbanded.

Usually this leads to a new president (usually, a PM) getting appointed, but ultimately would lead to new elections.

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah. If they were not getting paid or it was disbared (non English speaker. It's the first time I've seen that word so it might be wrong), then they would approve any budget, which could be arguably worse

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network -4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago) (2 children)

If members of congress were not paid, the richer members could use a shutdown to coerce the poorer members,

Pretty sure all congresspeople get paid at least 6 figures per year.

They can survive their entire term off of just 1 year's salary.

But! They won't be able to waste money like idiots/most people on social media.

Edit: Without fail, the useful idiots come out to bat.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They get paid 174k a year.

They usually end up needing 2 homes, and dozens of flights between their home district an DC.

New congresspeople are typically very poor before they start getting bribes

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network -1 points 27 minutes ago (1 children)

You can live for over a decade on that amount of money.

Stop being stupid. Please. I know it's hard to ask since you get to fit in with other morons, but try to understand that you are part of the problem when you pretend that congresspeople need that money.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 minutes ago

Not in the US with two homes.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

That's not the correct approach, brother. Especially newer congressmen will be dependent on this income to live, and this would make them even more likely to be held hostage by the guys with fat pockets.

The problem here is that the consequences are exclusively shouldered by the people, when in fact it should be the administration who gets punished: if they're unable to compromise on a budget, then they need to get kicked out so that the country doesn't stop.

If there's no way of passing the budget with a new administration, then call for new elections and see how the chips fall.

[–] kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Some lawmakers said they can’t afford missing a pay period.

“I’m not wealthy, and I have three kids. I would basically be missing, you know, mortgage payments, rent payments, child support,” Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., told NBC News. “So it’s not feasible, not gonna happen.”

oh so just like the thousand of workers that are being affected right now....

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Keep in mind, she's saying that while living at a higher quality of life than most of you.

It's not an on/off switch, it's a gradient where people try to live as lavishly as possible for as little effort as possible.

[–] kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

he's a he apparently, twice divorced. First married to the mayor phoenix and now to a lobbyist for the national association of realtors. Also went to harvard. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruben_Gallego

Senator Ruben Gallego has filed a new annual financial disclosure, which was parsed by Quiver's congressional net worth tracking software.

Some of the disclosed holdings which were parsed include:

Up to $50,000 in Aspiration Up to $50,000 in Aspiration Fund Adviser LLC Up to $50,000 in NameCoach Inc. Up to $15,000 in Aggressive Track: 80% Equity Portfolio Up to $15,000 in JFFCX - Jpmorgan Smartretirement 2055 Fd C

We have data on up to $100.0K of trades from Senator Ruben Gallego, which we parsed from STOCK Act filings

https://www.quiverquant.com/news/Senator+Ruben+Gallego+has+filed+a+new+financial+disclosure+-+here%E2%80%99s+what+we+see

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Millions. Not thousands. Millions of civil servants who work tirelessly and often thanklessly to make everyday life better for us all.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Right, but you don't want him to make a bad deal just to put food on his own table.

It's kind of a bad situation either way, but I'd prefer they keep getting paid and don't have to take bribes or a shit deal for me for his own personal gain.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hot take: Congress should be paid during a shutdown

The wealthy members of congress don't care about their salary. They already have large amounts of money made even bigger by insider trading, bribery, and the promise of a lucrative "consulting" role when they leave congress

The honest, working class members of congress rely on their salary. Taking away their salary would give a powerful tool for the wealthy congress members to force the working class members to vote with the wealthy members. It would also incentivize more corruption. Insider trading looks a whole lot more tempting when your income suddenly disappeared and you have $3,000 in rent due tomorrow

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, now use this kind of logic to protect the pay of federal employees during shutdowns.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. All salaries should be paid but no buying anything and all buildings shutdown with utilities off. All current equippment should be considered to have a lean on them to cover us obligations and can't be used.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It’s lien, but I’d also like someone to give all the equipment some lean so they can chill during the shutdown.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Since they can't use equipment to me they should get paid but not do anything until sorted.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

The employees should also be issued some lean so they can chill too, I like your style.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

They get a ton of extra perks straight from the government that you don't even want to know about because it should fill you with rage. They're leeches.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 6 points 22 hours ago

Hey, come on, there’s no need to insult leeches.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Some of the best health care in the world.

I've seen speculation that the health care benefits are a big reason why 90 year old Congress critters refuse to retire.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They should finally just amend that paper to say "Fuck the People" instead of "We the People". The "People" no longer have any say and the ballot box is like Schrödinger's Cat.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The “People” no longer have any say

When did they?

Certainly not when the document was signed.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Funny how the government seemed to work fine with no shutdown during Biden's presidential tenure.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

There was an ugly shutdown fight in March of 2024. And Biden had ample share of bureaucratic bungles, largely due to his continued reliance on private contractors at firms like SpaceX and Palantir and Microsoft and Boeing.

That these tech giants ended up stabbing him in the back to move Trump into his seat only further illustrates how badly Biden mangled his single term in office.

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Surprised look

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

They should not have retirement or good benefits. If we ever get out of this elected officials should be held to a higher standard and given the bare minimum of what they give the citizens

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

They should be forced to work just like the military is forced to.

Lock them all in the building, no tweeting, if they are hungry, they can eat prison food.

They stay there until conflict is resolved. Or they can resign their position and forever give up the right to be involed in politics... 🤷‍♂️

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago

Of course they do.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

You didn't think they'd inconvenience themselves, did you?

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

These comments are gonna be spicyyyy