this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
688 points (89.7% liked)

memes

17556 readers
2334 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I respect people's right to use apple products, but please stop asserting "privacy", big corps doesn't give a shit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 86 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Apple does give a shit about privacy… in the same way that companies care about gay pride. Right now privacy is still a selling point for Apple compared to other companies. This is why they are still so loud about on device AI and pretty much silent when any of their features require cloud processing. But am under no illusions that will remain the case forever.

As far as “dumb phones” are concerned; they don’t exist anymore. It’s still a device with an OS, GPS (as required by the law that created the Amber Alert here in the US), and an Internet connection, that makes calls using VoLTE or similar. Most of the ones you can buy today run things like KaiOS which has an App Store and comes with Google Maps preinstalled.

If you want real privacy you need to disconnect from the Internet which pretty much means no phones at all now that everything is VoIP.

[–] dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip 28 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (16 children)

Apple has 2x very publicly resisted government demands for user data and campaigned against laws to institute backdoors into their software and services. They’re not perfect by any means but they are by far a lesser evil.

A fully capable Linux phone is the dream, but most people aren’t going to use one. For the majority of people, I would recommend the company that refused to listen to the US and EU about weakening the security of their products over the one with the business model of relying on advertising to you and selling your data.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

And they have proven if the government makes a law requiring access they'll do it. They have done it for China and Russia.

[–] dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip 9 points 16 hours ago

Well yeah they kinda have to at that point in order to continue conducting business in that country. What about this is specific to Apple?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

That’s literally any company though. If you want to legally operate in a certain country, you need to abide by the country’s laws. Sure, pirate FOSS projects could exist. But that’s not the kind of shit that will be sold in retail, because it would literally be illegal to sell.

This is like complaining that Japanese phones can’t disable the camera shutter sound. It’s because Japan regulated the shutter sound, because upskirting was a major issue. So phones legally sold in Japan are required to have the shutter sound permanently set at a high volume, even when the ringer is silenced. That isn’t the phone maker’s fault.

Apple campaigned against regulation like what you’re complaining about. It isn’t Apple’s fault that the regulation was passed anyways.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 79 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

I hate the term sideloading. It's a made-up propaganda word to make it seem scary or wrong to install software on your device. All in the name of corporate profits.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 21 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Yea, who are google and apple to tell us what to do with OUR devices that WE OWN anyways?

I will never buy a smartphone(or a computer) that I can't replace the stock OS on, because the transaction for me and the device maker should end when I buy their device, period.

The entire business model of selling me a device only to then extract the maximum possible amount of data points, sell that data to fuck-knows-who(compromising my privacy, and possibly safety), and maximizing targeted ads to attempt to manipulate me is beyond absurd.

[–] koyu@discuss.koyu.space 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Ironically I own a Google device, but only to use an operating system that respects me and my choices. If Google was just providing device trees for their new phones...

Due to our favourite kind of software (banking apps) I am unable to use another kind of operating system at this point.

Also I don't sideload. I install software on a computer that I own, because I paid actual money for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's like "jaywalking" oooh oh no don't "jay" walk, don't "side" load; conform to our business machines! Your natural existence and free movements are an inconvenience to us therefore you have to change.

Or whatever bullshit--however they couch it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

"Warning: If you unlock your phone, it might explode or you might become a terrorist. Also we won't pay your money back even if there is faulty hardware because there is non zero chance you might have caused it while unlocking"

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 68 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly haven't heard that one. I've only heard "I used android for freedom. If android is becoming a shitty apple, I'll just use the better apple"

[–] Darohan@lemmy.zip 21 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

That's sort of where I'm at right now to be honest. Google has removed or plan to remove basically everything that gave Android an edge over iOS. Meanwhile Apple, for all their flaws, has actually put out some pretty compelling offerings with the iPhone 17 line both hardware- and software-wise, and has made meaningful improvements in the realm of repairability and side-loading, albeit under regulatory pressure. At this point, it's looking like going to be harder than I'd like to choose between the two when I go to replace my phone in 3-5 years - provided both companies stay on their current trajectories.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stomata@sh.itjust.works 51 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There is no word called sideloding it's called installing software

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 19 points 13 hours ago

"Sideloading" means "defeating a walled garden to install software"

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 45 points 1 day ago

That'd be like saying "I totally trust Google with all of my so-called offline documents by using their totally online suite. They totally wouldn't like, be analyzing the contents once I am online or anything, would they?"

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I find it hilarious that anyone thinks apple cares about privacy. They clearly have been cultivating that image but it rings pretty hollow to me. They just chose something that would be easy to say they care about that an ad company clearly also doesn't care about.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

They care about privacy as they consider themselves the owner of your data.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone remember r/hailcorporate and its brief moment of fame before the popular subs banned mention of it and its own mods started running a crypto scam?

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It was annoying. Couldn't mention any brand name in any context without getting an "/r/hailcorporate" comment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (7 children)

Yeah, you can go with a Linux phone but forget about:

  • controlling any IOT device
  • using any smart watch/sport trakcer
  • Android Auto or any remote car features
  • mobile banking
  • authenticating at work
  • buying public transport tickets from your phone
  • using apps for boarding pass when flying
  • charging your car at most public chargers
  • using any type of digital ID or documents

If you're already a luddite that's awesome, you're free to move to Linux phones. If you like modern tech and the convenience it gave us it will be really fucking sad to lose all of it because or corporate greed.

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Agreed, but is a chicken and egg problem. People won't use Linux because the apps they want don't support it and apps won't support it because most people don't use Linux. Someone will have to cave in if we want to break this stupid proprietary duopoly.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] j4k3@piefed.world 20 points 23 hours ago

Google: app developers use the zygote loading system to create an everpresent preloaded bedroom on your device with access to whatever they want in sensor hardware access and monitoring. It is essentially like a full equivalent computer user in parallel. This is how it just works while the (exploited-mark) human user is ignorant about operating systems, networking, and security. They have full equivalent access because you do not understand the details. Again these are full equivalent users. They are likely intimately preset with you more than any other partner... If they are there for stalkerware digital slavery, to sell your digital person for exploitation and manipulation, such a transaction is much like prostitution. The motivations of developers that are not whoring people out are mostly benevolent, altruistic, or taking a stand to support liberal democratic freedom. So in essence google is a digital slaver running a loose coalition of independent developer pimps that collectively enslave your digital person for manipulation and exploitation.

Apple: is a central fascist neo feudal lord that centralizes the exploitation and slavery under a single market forum where they directly manipulate and extort every developer and slave. Apple is the stalkerware data salver selling the exact same data to manipulate and extort users just like google.

The difference has been an open market free for all of privateer piracy raiding the coast of Africa to fuel the Southern plantations and flying the Jolly Roger of google, versus the matrix growing humans in a vast vat field with the Jolly Roger of Apple on the side of the buildings. To call one different than the other in terms of privacy is a joke as sour as US politics represents a balanced spectrum of interests. It is all stalkerware data slavery ownership of a part of an individual's physical person for exploitation and manipulation. Open Source software is the last bastion fortress of real citizens in a democracy fighting off zombie pirates flying a Jolly Roger. This is a choice between Apple vanishing people and Google abducting them from the fortress.

ROMs are the red pill, a revolver, and a place to stay for fightimg for freedom from the 21st century digital slavery phase of neo fascism, and its coming total war 3.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Idk what I'm gonna do if the F-Store stops working.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago (12 children)

First of all: writing this from my iPhone. I’ve been on various android phones, including flashed to Sailfish and alternative ROMs, and I kinda hate being on an iPhone now. But - it works.

Look at the incentives of Google and Apple. Google sells ads. That’s it. Any operation at Google other than that is just a small side hustle. Apple sells hardware and 30% commission on apps/media. Apple’s incentives to fuck over the privacy of individuals is far smaller than Google’s incentives. That’s it.

Let’s go through the list:

  • Android vendors (Samsung et. al): Zero incentive to not sell you out. Also, no recurring revenue throughout device lifetime (except selling your data), so zero incentives to provide more than absolutely minimal software support after sale.
  • Open Source ROMs: All the incentive, but zero funding or business model. Continually fighting against Google. Thus, not really an option for ”normal” people. I won’t hand my mother a flashed phone, and she won’t be able to flash one on her own.
  • Sailfish: Had incentives and a business model. When I used it, the developers could barely keep the web browser patched. Tell me that’s good for privacy.
  • Apple: Has incentives to patch and update older phones (recurring revenues from AppStore and iCloud), and doesn’t really sell any ads themselves.

Apple are anti-consumer assholes with a clear objective of creating lock-in under the guise of ”privacy” and ”security”, and they really want to force people into buying more hardware. Agreed. But they are the only major phone vendor that doesn’t have incentives to actively screw you over.

Is a flashed ROM ”better” for ”privacy”? Probably. Should you get your mother an iPhone? Yes.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Both Tim and Pinchai paid Donald Trump money to attend his inauguration and lick his ass on a daily basis. They both have one very big incentive to invade their user's privacy: American fascism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The last panel could also say “muh iPhone! I was never allowed to sideload anyway!” [I say this as an iPhone user]

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

you can make your point without ableism, you know

also, has anyone (at least here on lemmy) said "well at least apple cares about privacy!!"? the most ive seen is "apple is less atrocious with privacy than google", which is demonstrably true (tho if you care about maximum privacy, using an iphone is obviously not a good idea)

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

This is only ableist if you believe the drooling idiot at the bottom has a disability and is not just a drooling idiot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Um…who actually thinks #3? Apple tells you they sell your stuff and makes app devs tell you. They still sell it, mine it, tailor it for ads, all the same stuff as Google…but just not as pervasive.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

The GrapheneOS people. Everyone in their IRC unironically thinks Iphones are highly secure, in part BECAUSE they are proprietary. But they also don't tolerate any criticism of Google, especially if you criticize Google for being proprietary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chocrates@piefed.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I hear Linux phones are close for daily driver stuff. Gonna try one when I am ready for a phone.

Pretty disappointed in my 2 year old pixel, regardless of Googles continued enshitification

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

My biggest issue with the alternative phones is I'm not paying a massively inflated price for bad hardware just because it's using free software, sorry. Same goes for Framework laptops. I will tolerate paying a premium, but everything about the device must match the price tag.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

The fact that there are only two operating systems and both are locked down is a major problem. Unless a company like Valve invests heavily in a linux phone it is unlikely to ever go mainstream enough for developer or device support.

We need governments and legislators to force these systems open. To enshrine the right to control the things you own and criminalize any attempt to curb people’s ownership or control. That is the first step. Once that’s in place, the environment for a third option to exist will be in place.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It’s less that Apple cares about privacy, and more that it’s easier for them to control within a walled garden. If you control all of the levers, the rest naturally falls into place. That doesn’t mean it’s better; it’s just different.

[–] amon@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

Apple is secure in the same way a prison is secure. It is great at stopping attackers from entering but also great at stopping you from getting out if you don't do it the approved way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itztalal@lemmings.world 8 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

I'm so glad someone else is seeing this.

Watching people say "I'll just use an iphone because android is too locked down" really reinforces my opinion of the average person.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 8 points 7 hours ago

I'm sorry I'm not buying a Linux phone or similar for the same reason I'm not going to become a mechanic to drive a car. I want to activate my SIM card and go. Out of the box. I don't want to have to know about kernel access side booting in dev mode. People like me are the primary user base for most devices.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How are devs supposed to test their apps on devices before they publish?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They can upload their ID to google, pay $25 USD, and then sign their apps using their own signing key which was pre-approved by Google.

Its the same for apple, but I think their fees are like $99 per year.

There are also reports of Google potentially leaving in a ADB bypass for it.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I just want smart tube to keep working on my shield

load more comments
view more: next ›