this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
247 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64545 readers
627 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this month we noted how Disney and ESPN had sued Sling TV for the cardinal sin of actually trying to innovate. Sling TV’s offense: releasing new, more convenient day, weekend, or week-long shorter term streaming subscriptions that provided an affordable way to watch live television.

These mini-subscriptions, starting at around $5, have already proven to be pretty popular. But, of course, it challenges the traditional cable TV model of getting folks locked into recurring (and expensive) monthly subscriptions. Subscriptions that often mandate that you include sports programming many people simply don’t want to pay for.

So of course Time Warner has now filed a second lawsuit (sealed, 1:25-mc-00381) accusing Dish Network of breach of contract. In the complaint, Warner Bros lawyer David Yohai argues that this kind of convenience simply cannot be allowed:

“The passes fundamentally disrupt this industry-standard model by allowing customers to purchase access to the most sought-after programming, such as major sports events, essentially a la carte for a fraction of the cost that the consumer would have had to pay to watch the event on a pay-per-view basis. For example, a sports fan could simply purchase a day pass and watch select programming, such as a highly popular sports game, without purchasing a month-long subscription or paying a higher pay-per-view fee.”

Not disruption and convenience!

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] falseWhite@programming.dev 74 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"For example, a sports fan could simply purchase a day pass and watch select programming, such as a highly popular sports game, without purchasing a month-long subscription or paying a higher pay-per-view fee."

WOW. The greed is insane! What total pieces of sh*t! They're not even hiding it

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 12 points 4 hours ago

To paraphrase:

"For example, someone could purchase a single sandwich, instead of a loaf of bread, several pounds of meat and cheese, various produce items, and a few jars of condiments."

Do they not see how dumb they sound!?

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 15 hours ago

The quote is chefs kiss they’re not even trying to hide that shit. Imagine you could watch a sports event without getting virtually mugged

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 15 hours ago

This is basically mafia. Boycott them, people!

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 46 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

They're suing over the creation of competition in the market? Certainly an interesting strategy. I hope WB, Disney, and every other scum-sucker that thinks suing is acceptable gets raked across the coals.

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 11 hours ago

The only competition they want to have, is basically when they put their acquisitions against eachother like fighting with toy soldiers and see who can impress their corporate masters the most. It's sickening.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, this sure sounds like the "free market" correcting itself as these people love to prattle on about.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The passes fundamentally disrupt this industry-standard model

Funny how they didn't care about how streaming in general disrupted cable. Or how cable disrupted broadcast. Or how tv disrupted radio ...

[–] antipiratgruppen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 53 seconds ago)

"Video Killed The Radio Star", even, was distributed in Canada and Brazil by WEA [Warner, Elektra, Atlantic], according to Discogs. Interesting!

EDIT: But wait for their next big release with a more aggressive tone: "Sling TV Pissed Off Conglomerates"...

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

i ask everyone i meet if they've accepted their lord and saviour jellyfin into their lives.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Wake me up when Jellyfin does live sports

[–] teft@piefed.social 8 points 9 hours ago

It already does. Just google iptv on jellyfin and find one of the articles that teaches you how to load a .m3u into jellyfin. Boom live tv.

It's a little annoying to get going but it's doable.

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Jellyfin can use .m3u playlists for live TV. It’s a bit of work to get it going, but it is possible.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I pray to no false gods. But I do cherish Jellyfins daddy Emby. I would probably use Jellyfin but I have a lifelong emby paid from donating when they first took over MB.

[–] Cerothen@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

I too have lifetime Emby and still use it today. Media browser renamed to Emby. They took the M and B from the old name to get the new one.

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 12 hours ago

Wrong prophet but I like the religion.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 27 points 7 hours ago

Sling couldn't have asked for a better marketing campaign

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 8 hours ago

This is so petty and a perfect example of why american capitalism is horrible and the government does nothing to control corporations or monopolies.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So it's the lightbulb syndicate again eh?

[–] blueworld@piefed.world 6 points 10 hours ago

I always wonder why people venerate Edison so much. He did innovate, but man was he a shifty barron.

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 16 points 14 hours ago

Normally I'd say Sling didn't have a prayer under this administration, but Disney has pissed everybody off - including the Grand Cheeto - so I'm just gonna go stock up on some popcorn...

[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The passes fundamentally disrupt this industry-standard model by allowing customers to purchase access to the most sought-after programmin

Wait wait wait, I thought disruption was good? 🤔

[–] arararagi@ani.social 6 points 3 hours ago

Only when Silicon Valley does it to someone else!

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 11 hours ago

I expect them to come after Pluto and Tubi in the future...

We can't have nice things. Either those two get sued or outright bought.

Also, choke on a dick, Yohai, you fucktard.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Business idea: Get subscriptions to Disney and ESPN streaming services, then let other people buy access to those accounts for one day at a time. You'd log in for them and give them the session cookie, or something like that. Shouldn't be too hard to find a country in which that isn't breaking any laws, although I'm guessing it's probably not the USA.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's certainly breaking TOS, so the country you're in doesn't matter.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect that you may be overestimating the extent to which every piece of bullshit inserted into a TOS document that nobody reads is universally enforceable.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a legal issue. They'd just shut down any accounts doing this. They already detect and shut down account sharing and this is just a variant of that. No law or government intervention necessary.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

One could make it technically somewhat difficult to shut down, but better yet would be to get some timely government intervention, on the side of defending our rights to do such things on the same kind of principle as the well-established doctrine of first sale.