I learned a while ago that I don't have to go see things that don't interest me. Once you accept this, a lot of the media made that you don't like will bother you less.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Can't complain on the internet with a thought process like that, though. /s
This, plus I find it way easier to not care now that I don't watch television anymore and have a good adblocker and so never see advertisements for movies.
Yes but you must acknowledge the crowding out effect. There are only so many screens. If so many are taken up by the never-ending sequel/adaptation/remake churn, that leaves precious little chance to actually see something original. If you're a movie buff, I could see how that could become frustrating, even if you never watch any of the content you don't like.
Most of the movies worth watching don't play in theaters.
It can still be difficult to find good things because there is a sea of shit and the average person is a moron so their recommendations can't be taken seriously.
I'm tired of people complaining about remakes and reboots. Original movies are released every week. If you care enough to complain, you should care enough to keep track of what movies are coming out and not rely on marketing to tell you what to see. Nobody is making you see remakes and reboots. Millions of people are seeing them so clearly, they are appealing to millions of people. If people would stop seeing them, Hollywood would stop making them.
Ah, but the production money doesn't flow to many original movies, but almost always gets invested in existing franchises. The result is a bunch of original movies that would have been better if they'd had a bigger budget. Add to that the issue of marketing: no one is going to the film that doesn't advertise, have guests on talk shows, and gets limited distribution. The big studios have contracts with the theaters and tiny films are frequently relegated to art houses.
Lastly, I don't think it is fair to ask people to do homework on which movies to watch. I mean, I do that, but I'm a freak that way. Most people don't have the time, and they aren't looking for the next Citzen Cane, they're looking for a light escape from a difficult week. Ideally, people would follow a critic that has tastes similar to their own, but in the fractured world of the internet, that gets hard. There are too many voices and they rotate in and out too often to figure out who's currently matching your tastes.
People are ultimately choosing to see remakes and sequels. If it was really a huge problem for the majority of moviegoers, they'd go see original movies. Anyone who cares enough to complain should care enough to do research.
Almost a third of Americans who could vote don't -- either by not registering at all or registering but not casting a ballot. Do you really think people who don't have the time to vote -- people with jobs and/or kids at home -- want to "do research" for their down time? They aren't 'going' anywhere. They flip on the boob tube and catch whatever has made it to cable/free-streaming. Then they are disappointed because they liked the first one and this new one is so bad by comparison.
I'm retired, so I do research, and while I'm not the one complaining, I DO sympathize with the complainers that don't want to invest as much time as I do on inspecting the lineage of a film and what might make it worth viewing.
I've seen interesting remakes and sequels -- like just this week I rewatched Fassbinder's original The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant because I hadn't yet seen Ozon's remake, Peter von Kant, where the main characters reverse sexes. There's more crossovers with those two directors and I care about it, so I watch all those. What I didn't see was all the Spidermans, Batmans, and Marvel movies.
The oldest and most natural form of human storytelling is to take stories people are already familiar with and extend them or retell them in new ways... and copyright broke that form of storytelling, but we still have a thirst for it. So we get entertainment companies buying the right to exploit that thirst, for sums that make it too risky to entrust the outcome to actual artists.
I heard that the contract for fantastic 4's IP meant the movie company had to make a movie with it at least every 10 years or they'd lose it. They subcontracted it to 20th century and because nobody gave a flaming shit about it, they put out a shitty f4 movie every 10 years.
Disney now owns the company that they contracted the rights to so they had a hand in the most recent one, but not the others afaik.
This is how Sony’s Spider-Man rights work (worked?). It’s why we’ve had 3 reboots in the last 20 years and why Marvel had to contract the rights back from Sony to get him in the Avengers movies.
No, number of shits given 0.0. You know you don't have to watch them right ? They make them becase they work
Kind of? I was tired, but then I stopped caring and just accepted most hollywood shit as garbage for morons.
Ya but they're gonna keep happening until it becomes financially riskier to do a reboot than a new IP. Reboots will have to consistently flop hard.
I want the rule that any IP rebooted twice in a 20 year period (the age music and cars are both considered "classics" and for cars emissions tests don't apply), the IP and any derivative works immediately becomes public domain.
just revert all copyright back to: 14 years, plus the ability to renew it one time, for 14 more
Number 4 movie of the year:
Jurassic World: Rebirth $339,640,400
Last year:
Number 111 Megalopolis $7,629,085
So it sure doesn't look like people are tired of reboots and remakes yet.
Is it though? While I didn’t watch either, I heard of one. Over and over. Everywhere. This is the first time I’ve heard of the other.
At least some of this is also self-fulfilling, not just what people want to watch
Megalopolis was a passion project for Francis Ford Coppola for decades and was well discussed in the media when it came out.
It was a struggle to go see it because nobody went and it largely vanished in a week.
I could argue similar issues with even big budget popular movies. They seem to be in theaters only a few weeks and I struggle to see even these.
That was one of my reasons for considering becoming a frequent moviegoer. I’ve only ever gone to movies I want to see, which works out to at most a half dozen per year. But given needing to pick up new hobbies, being able to afford seeing things in theaters, and how many I’ve missed out on, would it be so bad to join one of those clubs where you see a movie every couple weeks?
Jurassic world afterbirth was one of the worst movies I've ever seen in my life. And I enjoy bad movies, just not like that.
Jurassic world afterbirth was one of the worst movies I've ever seen in my life. And I enjoy bad movies, just not like that.
Depends. There are good reboots occasionally, e.g. Dune.
But most, primarily Disney IP stretching and recycling is usually not worth watching. Regardless if it a "real life version" of a classic animation or the twentieth Star Wars movie or series.
Controversial opinion which my dad and I share but the new Dune movies lack a level of artistry and creativity that Lynch did far better on with his. They are good movies, great even, but they just seem flat and soulless like any other Hollywood epic lately.
I got tired of the movie industry in general. Just stopped going to the cinema and/or buying Blu-rays.
Went to through the entire effort of making an arr pirate ship only to realize there is jack to watch, and I would rather just spend $12 to see a movie in theater once a year, since that's about all I ever see something new worth watching.
As usual the most useful thing that has come out of it is just getting easy access to old and foreign media which otherwise impossible to access online anyway, so now my career of sailing the high seas turned into yet another media archive collection.
The real crime here is people paying cash money to see this slop in theater. I mean I guess $12-15 is not that much, but why not use that for a different movie or even a better form of entertainment? I feel like people settle for mediocre value way too much, or find it valuable enough despite some genuinely excellent alternatives to choose from.
I feel like part of this is cultural, part is economic, and part is just statistics.
Culturally, it feels like everyone is more fatigued and stressed out. And when you feel that way, you want things that are familiar and comfortable. So if you want to go out to see a movie, you want to see something you know is going to make you feel good. Hence, you will choose Kung Fu Panda 4 rather than a psychological thriller directed by and starring no one you've ever heard of. Kung Fu Panda 4 might not be good, but you at least got some good feelings seeing some characters you are familiar with interact on-screen.
Economically, theatres are struggling. After all, why go to the movies when you can just watch a movie on netflix without putting on pants? Small, independent theatres are combatting this by diversifying their offerings and making the theatre experience more community-focused. They are hosting live shows, open mics, and films for niche comminities, and include time for social mixing around the theatre before and after. But large corporate theatres which are designed exclusively to churn people through a movie-watching assembly line, which have binding contracts with major movie studios, have to make blockbuster movies happen. So they do this by appealing to the lowest common denominator. Kung Fu Panda 4 might not be the biggest in terms of ticket sales, but it is a much safer bet than the aformentioned psychological thriller. So large corporate theatres pressure the large corporate movie makers to make what they are comfortable selling.
Finally, there is pure statistics. Again, netflix. You've rallied. You've remembered there is more to life than sitting on the couch. You're gonna put on pants, goddammit! So what are you gonna do now, with an untempered spirit, the whole world in front of you, and a fully-clothed ass?
I dunno, fucking take a ballet class or something. Learn a martial art. Play tag with strangers in the park - or in a corporate office (they don't like this). Take pictures of the moon through a telescope. Get slapped in the face by a sexy stranger in a dance club. Slap a sexy stranger in the dance club (I bet they liked it). Go find other pants to wear on other days of the week! So many options!!!
So if you are going to break free of your screen, put on pants, and go outside - why would you pay money to go right back inside and stare at a different screen? The answer is obvious - the modal person who watches movies in movie theatres is very boring, and Kung Fu Panda 4 is what they want to watch. Of course, there are plenty of not-boring people who go to the movies - but they attend far less frequently, and are less predictable in their tastes. Hence, the industry caters to people who see watching corporate movies as something worthy of putting on pants for - boring people.
Personally, yes.
But it's clear from box office numbers that remakes make more money and people are hesitant to spend their money on untested, new properties. It costs a lot to go out to a movie nowadays, which is a separate problem in itself. When you're taking your family to see a film, do you want to risk a new universe that you may not enjoy, or just go with something that you KNOW you'll at least be able to somewhat enjoy.
The Gorge is a perfect example of this. Good premise, but flopped. In fact I think the last "genre" new I.P that made any sort of splash that I can remember was "A Quiet Place", and that was due at least in part because it was the directorial debut of Jim from the office.
Because of this, original I.Ps get smaller releases, get faster onto streaming services if no immediately, and are less advertised.
So it's all a vicious circle, but an understandable one from both a moviegoer and a business perspective.
You know you don't have to watch them. They're only being released because people watch them.
I recently made an Unpopular Opinion post about this (TL;DR I'm supportive of remakes/reboots if done with genuine passion for the material, just as I am with cover versions of songs or transplantations of stage plays to modern settings/Disney cartoons, etc.):
https://lemmy.world/post/35309322
The originals aren't going anywhere (unless you're George Lucas 😒), and there are new films coming out every week from all over the world, the reboots/remakes are like less than 1% of what gets released in any given year. Marketing and social media can make things seem bigger and more pervasive than they actually are. Having said that, I'd honestly be happier if the number was more like 5% (with the aforementioned caveats about passion, talent and quality).
But yeah, there are lots of remakes/reboots that are borne of pure cynicism and boardroom sociopathy. Fuck those. But they aren't the only ones on offer. Baby/bathwater.
Been tired of it since Total Recall's remake. The sole exception has been KOTH season 14.
McDonald's and the MCU/popcorn flicks/cheap remakes and sequels of recognisable IPs are all the common man needs. I stopped getting mad at this kind of thing a long time ago and just learned to live with it.
I'd be happy with the one reboot rule. can we use it on wheel of time immediately?
As a fan of the books I'm so happy I never watched the TV show. My gut kept telling me it will only end in disappointment.
It is baffling to me what gets remade over and over again.. I guess someone is making money off the Peter Pan and Robin Hood remakes, and the Alice in wonderland… then there is the Christmas Carol remakes.
I am tired of them, pre pandemic there were original movies during the summer and Xmas movie seasons, now there is nothing but remakes, in those seasons but I am pretty much Done with going to movie theaters though, so I don’t really GAF about remakes.
Maybe we need to get away from 200m budgets. Some of the best stuff I've seen in the last decade has been smaller budget affairs.
Idk...they were still doing this shit plenty pre-pandemic. Disney is notorious for it and it has bothered me to no end. I refuse to watch any of their continual releases of abominations of older great films.
I think your maths is off. If every, or most, popular films in 2010 were remade, I think you would be even more irritated.
I think a better idea is to expand the universes of those movies.
I've still yet to understand what the purpose of the How To Train Your Dragon remake was.
Cash grab
yeah it gets a bit frustrating when i would like to see more invested into new stories (not saying this never happens, it does! i just mean...even more lol). i do think its possible for remakes to be good (or even great!) so i try to keep an open mind about them but imo an ideal remake/reboot needs to have a strong vision and forge its own identity, nod to the original but also very much do its own thing. tricky balance and maybe its just that theres rarely enough time/money/patience/risktaking given to support good, fresh writing :/
I agree. I also feel like the audience/customer has been hypnotized by hollywood to accept this BS. Like its pushing "we should boycott" it levels
Come on, you don't want to watch another King Kong? Jokes aside, yes. Especially since it all comes from ignoring the other obvious problems of the industry (e.g. bad ideas written horribly).