this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
382 points (98.7% liked)

News

32499 readers
3208 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 143 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I wish everybody stopped talking about "test run" and "slippery slope": we're 200% IN the authoritarianism. In fact, it's so authoritarian everybody can stop using the authoritarianism cutesy and call it what it is: FASCISM.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Im convinced voting can be cancelled, people rounded up for mass extrajudicial execution and media will still be running headlines about "our declining democracy"

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago

They're already rounding people up for extrajudicial deportation. If they happen to die in the process, well, they were illegal anyway!

We the people need to organize and resist. Get involved in your local community.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is part of the reason why so many on the right are labeling any use of "fascism" as dangerous rhetoric -- to remove the ability to discuss current happenings in a more meaningful way.

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I have a friend of a friend who is still maga. I heard him say that if anyone uses the words nazi or fascist he dismisses everything that person has to say or stops listening. I was like you can’t talk about this current moment accurately without using those words.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

I started calling it fascism a few months back. When the shoe fits. And holy crap does it fit.

In January I said "the parallels to 1933 in Germany cannot be ignored", which is still kindof a mild statement, but my "enlightened conservative" relations already went up in arms about that.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 84 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We got a stop saying test run. We're in it. Sure it's "testing" in that they're seeing how far they can get, but we're in the fascist regime.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Came here to say this as well. We’re not test running for authoritarian, we’re in it. Now we’re just testing to see what the backlash is and how far and fast we can push it.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're self-identifying as fascists, openly spreading hate, and I am really loathe to see what happens next week at Pete's little military get-together. At some point the administration will just execute someone openly, extrajudicially, to see what happens there. At some point the courts stop being even a pretext.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You mean like blowing up people on boats in international waters they claim to be narco terrorists?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago

Seriously. Should just say "is next incremental step down the path."

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why is everyone so fucking passive about this stuff?

I guess we now know exactly how dictators rise.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are we already past the point of no return?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

Depends on what you consider 'no return'. Every fascist regime falls eventually.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago

With only what’s left of the antique led DNC what do you think?

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Well, if we talk about it here we get banned. I also think a lot of people just assume it’s all going to blow over.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if we talk about it here we get banned

"here" as in !news@lemmy.world ? I don't know, I often say it out loud and haven't been banned yet. But I rarely look back at which community I commented in.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

lol. I’ve burned so many accounts over bans for action that I don’t even know what my username is at this point.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck does that even mean? These ridiculous LLM created usernames.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, you want me to do more stuff for you. It means snail.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago

OOh yeah… I actually remember creating this one. There was an article about a snail crawling Across an apartment building call box buzzer and the tenants thought it was kids playing games

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dunno if ban evasion is something you want to be bragging about publicly.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? If I am not attached to a username, then the username would just switch if I got banned. Life would continue on in 30 seconds as if nothing happened. No one here has any power over anyone, so why should I be scared?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A lot of communities frown upon it

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, I frown on a lot of communities – so I suppose we’re even. And to answer your follow up ahead of time, I’ll go where I want and do what I want.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh shit, we got a badass over here

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks, I guess. But to me it’s a lot less grandiose when all I do is click a button and there is a fresh account.

I guess I could always spin up my own instance and keep one good account for acting superior, and then having thousands of accounts at the ready…. Like some people.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not getting banned for saying it, and I see comments to that effect on Lemmy constant.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Say the word, Bart?

INCITING VIOLENCE!!! Woooo

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh. So you incited violence. Hmm yeah wonder why anyone has an issue

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what’s your solution? More protesting?

If you haven’t noticed, ZERO efforts to curb fascism have worked in 2025.

My guess is that you’re not all that upset about it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

nah I love fascism. the answer is absolutely to scream about murder on social media tho

/s fucking obviously

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 days ago

So if you don’t have suggestions, just stay out of it. Sit back and let whatever happens happen.

[–] TorJansen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

You riding a horse?

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

Really? This is exactly what we should all be talking about especially after that last anti-1A, anti-Bill of Rights executive order.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Let's not forget some key points.

The "big beautiful bill act" is set up to destroy America slowly and most of it is due to take effect JANUARY 2027. Right after midterms. Not a coincidence. All of our healthcare will get more expensive and hospitals will shut down.

The tariffs the Republicans have approved are going to add between $4,000 and $8,700 to your annual living expenses as time goes on under Republicans.

If you want to ignore the blatant lies, propaganda, pedophilia, racism, fascism, and war crimes; you are a horrible person.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) faces up to 17 years in prison for an incident where she briefly made physical contact with federal law enforcement officers who were attempting to arrest another elected Democrat, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka. (..)

McIver is charged under a federal law that targets anyone who “forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes” with a federal law enforcement officer carrying out their official duties. There’s no question that McIver, who joined a group of people attempting to block federal agents from seizing Baraka, impeded or interfered with that arrest. But she only committed a crime if she did so “forcibly,” and the Trump administration’s claim that she did is quite a stretch.

A video of Baraka’s arrest shows a chaotic scrum where officers repeatedly laid hands on McIver. McIver also made contact with the officers a few times; in the most significant interaction, she appears to have placed her forearm on an officer who had just knocked her off balance and pushed him away.

It may be unlikely that a jury would convict McIver, but the mere fact that she must hire lawyers to defend herself places an extraordinary burden on her. House ethics rules prevent her from accepting pro bono legal counsel, so she must either pay for her legal defense — which could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars or more out of pocket — or use campaign funds to pay her attorneys.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I stand by that it's insane that resisting arrest of oneself or others and opposing and impeding law enforcement is illegal. Sure you shouldn't be allowed to attack, but the desire to be free and to stop unjust arrest should be considered innately human for the former and a consequence of internalized values of citizenship for the latter.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

but the desire to be free and to stop unjust arrest should be considered innately human for the former and a consequence of internalized values of citizenship for the latter.

Which is exactly why they made the laws against it. The spirit of the law is that a lawful arrest has to be allowed to take place and the courts should decide whether that arrest was valid. The letter of the law just makes you a felon if you try to stop an arrest, regardless of the situation.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Test run? No. It’s the actual thing.

She's the test case for more effectively prosecuting all his political enemies. He'll see what works on her and then apply it to everyone else.

This is what most of their authoritarian actions recently are. They apply it to a few first so they better apply it to the many.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's a test run the same way my temporary fixes at work are temporary

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

The advice remains the same. Start arming yourselves and everyone you know.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago