this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
63 points (95.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43470 readers
893 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

since kids aren't usually allowed to train with guns... were they all training with their parents before? or is it not that hard, so can any person with no expirience technically just pick up a gun and start shooting people?

(asking not 4 myself obvs, just out of curiosity)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

since kids aren’t usually allowed to train with guns

What?

I went to a rural school, and everyone had a "hunters education" class in like 7th grade. We never touched a gun but we could legally go hunting with a gun after.

A shit ton of kids hunt, and most ranges are fine with kids if an adult is with them too.

Like, it varies state to state, but in lots of areas it's weird for someone to graduate highschool before shooting a gun.

But besides all that, guns aren't difficult.

so can any person with no expirience technically just pick up a gun and start shooting people?

So yeah, pretty much.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I went to a rural school, and everyone had a “hunters education” class in like 7th grade. We never touched a gun but we could legally go hunting with a gun after.

That's crazy. I had no idea anyone had a class like that. We're basically training kids to be school shooters... at school?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You can't expect parents to do everything.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

No, I don't expect parents who are ignorant about guns to teach their kids safety. We shouldn't have to, but that's where we're at.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hunter's ed is basically the opposite of what you stated. It's not part of the state curriculum. It's similar to drivers ed courses for people to be able to get a learners permit before they turn 18. Similarly below a certain ages, most states require completion of a hunter's education course to be able to purchase a hunting license and legally hunt.

The courses go over topics like property rights, how to carry a weapon making sure it's not pointing at anyone, what high vis clothing is required, always knowing what is behind an animal before even aiming, rules about how a weapon must be unloaded when in a vehicle, and they strongly urge keeping an interference lock in the action of any firearm in storage.

Hunter's ed doesn't teach kids how to shoot, they teach kids how to not be idiots when hunting.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The person I replied to specifically said it was part of the 7th grade curriculum. Classes like that existing is not surprising, but it being part of middle school curriculum is very surprising to me.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

A large amount of Americans that grew up with firearms in the home learned to shoot at the ages of 5 to 7. The reason those ages are mentioned is because that's the time that an average human is able to hold a pistol unattended and play with it if they don't understand the danger. I never wanted to play with guns because I knew what they were and how they worked my entire life. Most of that training will simply be that if you find a firearm unattended, you are supposed to find an adult to attend that firearm. Explaining the dangers of firearms and that anything pointed at by a firearm will be destroyed. Explaining only goes so far. Seeing on the other hand, the power and destruction that can be wrought leaves a much more lasting impression. The main purpose of all of this is because children educated purely through media have many false ideas about firearms and weapons and damage that they can cause.

Media glorifies guns and gun use and violence. In media people get shot all the time and take no real damage for it. It is important to impress upon children that have easy access to firearms that they are tools and weapons and not toys.

Tldr Children are taught about guns for the same reason kids are taught sex education.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Sounds like an elective class. My ex-wife's niece was in an after-school shotgun club. I gather it was more target practice than hunting.

I'm of the opinion that familiarity with actually shooting is more of a deterrent to the school shooter mentality than fetishizing guns. I'm basing that mostly on the idea that these school shooters can't seem to handle a weapon, given that kills are the goal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 day ago

I learned how to shoot a shotgun when I was 13 at school. We were in the shooting club. It was just shotguns and skeet shooting, but still.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Even without much education, I was a geek in a rural location, one time a friend's dad put a cigarette (half 3/4 done or so) on a fence cause we were having a competition and we hit them all. Mean the cigarette was only say 15 - 20 feet away but I I split it in half with a BB gun (yes no kick of course), probably luck but I was hitting the targets too and the dad figured no one would hit that one. It wasn't a long range but I figure someone with access to a rifle should shoot fine enough if they practice even a bit if I can without access. I only shot a gun maybe a dozen times in total.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago

The hardest parts of gun use are aiming at long range and proper maintenance. Neither of those are a concern for someone planning to shoot at close range and not live another day.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago

They just aren't that hard to use.

As Thelma says, "can't be that hard, idiots use them all of the time".

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It's not like using a gun is hard. Training is more about maintenance and safety as well as accuracy. You don't need to be accurate if you're just firing indiscriminately into a crowd at close range and you also probably don't give a fuck about safety or maintenance.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can learn how to use almost any gun in about five minutes. Have a friend or family member that lets you take some practice shots in their backyard? Now you know enough to be dangerous.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Even without practice shots, every gun has the capacity to be dangerous no matter the extent of the users knowledge.

[–] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 20 hours ago

One might even say that a firearm becomes more dangerous in a less knowledgeable person's hands.

[–] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago
[–] Dunklets@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I've been shooting twice. From my experience it's shockingly easy the only kinda complicated thing is loading it. I'm sure YouTube has guides on anything that might be complicated.

[–] Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz 15 points 20 hours ago

The point of guns was to make warfare easier

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's not exactly hard to operate a firearm. They are designed to be used by the lowest common denominator of person - total morons.

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

Or alternatively (historically), expendable peasants that you don't want to finance painstaking archery training on.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 13 points 19 hours ago

It takes real, practiced skill and/or quality equipment to hit a bullseye at long range, or to kill an armed opponent at short range quickly and cleanly enough to not give them the chance to shoot you back. It takes no skill to hit an undefended, person-sized object at <10 meters, the distances involved in most indoor locations.

parents and family introduce them to guns.

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Shooting is like driving a car. A baby could do it. Few can do it safely.

Using a gun is really easy. And I suspect school showers aren't particularly concerned about safety, so that's not an issue for them

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I heard they make them pretty simple now. Some are even just point and shoot /s

[–] Una@piefed.europe.pub 9 points 21 hours ago

I am from Croatia, we have 1 rifle at home (hunting) and as a child I remember we will sometimes put plastic bottle and aim for bottle, so I guess similar is in USA? In rural places specifically. Of course it was all done with multiple of adults nearby. But I was always bad at it, and I am still scared to go near guns (intrusive thoughts)

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Kids know computers and just like guns it is a point and click interface

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago

They're not hard to use, they're hard to use well. And really, not that hard. I'm a pretty good shot, and I'd say I spent much less time learning to shoot than I did, say, computer-related skills which took way more practice, and study.

It's a blessing that most mass shooters are not skilled shooters. The shooters that are skilled tend to favour the rifle. They make each shot count, and typically only fire once. But, that's more of an assassination. People using handguns tend to miss a lot — I think they're really going for terror/fear and not a high casualty count.

The "problem" with being a good shooter is, you have certain safety tenets drilled into your head. Know where each shot is going to go, because you're responsible for the bullet once it's fired, and you can't get it back; don't point at anything you don't intend to destroy/don't have the right to destroy/don't have the legal right to destroy; shoot to kill, never to warn or maim; don't shoot if you can't be sure you will hit your target; etc. Specifically because I think it begs the question, about warning shots: they're dumb. The idea of shooting up to warn people. That bullet will eventually come down, at terminal velocity, and if it hits someone, it will do serious damage. If it hits the head just right, that warning shot absolutely can kill a bystander.

[–] o_oli@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Not to blame video games but genuinely having never even held a real gun I could definitely work out how to operate one from the thousands of hours I have interacted with them digitally lol. They ultimately are designed ground up to be user friendly and simple. Yes I would be a terrible aim etc but still not the point, an idiot can still cause chaos.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I knew how to operate a hunting rifle by the time I was 12, and I'm not even American.

And if you can operate a hunting rifle, you can operate an assault rifle to a reasonable degree. Not much training needed.

And the principle is easy to figure out. When I was in the army, while I was a recruit, this guy in my platoon had never touched a weapon before, and he was pretty nervous the first day on the shooting range because he was on a different training course the day we got introduced to the basics. But he figured it out by intuition; get the cartridge into the chamber, and get the hammer to hit the firing pin.

There are only so many mechanical things one can do with a rifle, and if you try a few things you're likely to figure it out.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

When I was in the army, ...

Consider, too, that the military needs every sack of meat to be able to shoot straight, load mags, clear malfunctions, clean and maintain. By extension, the light arms they use are designed to be as dead simple as possible.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

As someone on reddit once pointed at, the AR-15 platform is designed such that the dumbest 18-yo recruit can use it.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

I learned to shoot at Boy Scout camp when I was about 13. We shot .22 long rifle and 20 gauge shotguns. Many of my friends hunted (never appealed to me) and learned even earlier.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the US we're talking about, so there's no shortage of guns or people willing to teach other people to use guns. Sure, I doubt an eight year old could rock up to the local range and lease a weapon, but... there's always a crazy uncle. Besides that, there's no shortage of instructional material to be found online and elsewhere. Guns are not particularly complicated devices. Fill magazine with ammunition, insert magazine, pull and release charging handle (or slide), disengage safety (if any), point and pull the trigger. It's not particularly difficult. Hitting something is a different matter though.

I mean, I'm Danish, and guns are not exactly commonplace here, but I used to shoot pistols for sport in the indoor range beneath a local school starting when I was eleven.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Taught my kids the basics at 9 and 11. They need to understand the lethality of guns, what is safe and not safe, and maybe most importantly, how to recognize someone who is not being safe and get the hell away from them.

Plus, took the mystery out of the whole thing. Now they just don't care much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

In the US, it's not uncommon for parents to teach their kids how to shoot. I sadly was only ever allowed to shoot a bb gun. I'd like to own a gun someday. It's low on my list though.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 5 points 23 hours ago

I mean, my dad took me hunting when I was young...

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Learning the manual of arms (procedure of loading, firing, unloading a type of firearm) is a YouTube video away and isn't hard. If you can use a drill, a stapler or a nerf gun you can figure out how to make a gun go bang.

The difficult part is technique that makes the bullets go where you want them to. Shooting fast is easy, just mag dump in a general direction and you'll eventually hit something. Shooting slowly and accurately is way more effective and responsible. Basic marksmanship takes a bit of practice to hone but anyone can do it, including you reading this.

But shooting fast AND accurate is a skill that takes consistent practice to hone and keep. That's what makes competitons like USPSA so challenging

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I shot my first guns in kindergarten. My uncle's handgun and my grandpa's shotgun. Lived on the farm, it was just normal. But it was just in the farm, supervised of course. The moment my cousin and I were old enough we were in a firearms safety course so we could go hunting. Hell we used to help make ammo (just reloading shells).

Guns are really simple to use. Reloading for most guns people will ever encounter outside the military is simple. You got the safety switch and the trigger and it's really point and click at that point. I tell you the hardest part is learning how to hold it correctly. We've all seen videos of people holding a gun wrong and shenanigans ensues when they lose control of it. https://imgur.com/gallery/shotgun-fail-odC6s

[–] lystopad@mbin.twink.men 4 points 23 hours ago

1st time i have so many comments on a post... in an hour@

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

my friends and i played with guns as kids in a completely unsafe manner with no experience or instruction. chamber a round and pull the trigger. they're designed to be simple

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

It's not like they're complex devices to operate. and the internet has tons of resources.

[–] HC4L@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

YouTube videos?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hand guns are difficult to be accurate with if you've never shot one, and still not easy if you have. Nobody is going to fire one for the first time and be good at it, but within 10-15' the difference is probably just if the shot was lethal or not. Anything with a longer barrel like a shotgun or rifle, as long as you're pointing in the general direction it's as simple as pulling the trigger. The recoil is easier to deal with and it's easier to aim. Loading could take a second to figure out, but that's something that can be worked out before ever pulling the trigger.

I think the fact that most school shootings don't end up with dozens of kills is because it's not super easy to be skilled with all aspects of a firearm, but it's easy enough for quick damage.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's always blown my mind that school shootings are all relatively low in number compared to what you'd expect from someone with intent to kill as many people as they could.

The deadliest shooting was Virginia Tech; 32 killed, 17 wounded.

That's barely two classrooms full of students.

I've got no experience with guns, but I feel like it's nothing short of a miracle that the shooters are such a poor shot.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Gunshot wounds are surprisingly survivable given swift medical attention. Which astounds my because I know a fair deal about guns, shoot most weeks, and know what various weapons and rounds are capable of.

I'm guessing the shooters are scared shitless and shaking like leaves. I doubt most are as cold blooded and methodical as the Columbine shooters. I'm also guessing the Colorado shooter lost his nerve in a hurry when he saw the consequences of his actions. The vast majority of wounds don't seem to be anything like the Charlie Kirk fountain. In a way they're more horrifying because the victim drops like a puppet with their strings cut, not much blood at first, no drama, just dropped straight down. Somehow that scares me more.

That incident being, in my opinion, the beginning of these shootings. Shit like this simply didn't happen when I was a growing up, 70s through 90s. And civilians had access to the AR platform that whole time.

Funny thing about Virginia Tech, most of his kills were from his .22 pistol, about the last gun we would ever ban. That guy was calmly going for a high score. Again, that seems very atypical. Las Vegas shooter was the same particular brand of batshit insane.

Another shooting that should have been worse was the Aurora movie theater. Dumbass used a tacticool high-capacity mag. No, not the 30-round mag the gun was designed for, it was either a 50 or 100-round. It jammed almost instantly, because of course. LOL, I absolutely support idiot mags like that.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

The most successful gun designs are those that could be put in the hands of teenagers to turn them into killing machines

load more comments
view more: next ›