this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
67 points (95.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34533 readers
1066 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 76 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Young earth creationism and flat earth

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Young earth creationism

What I hate so much about that, is all the "evidence" just points to some near extinction level event that humans worldwide suffered.

And obviously for that to have happened, it means there had to be a lot more people.

Like, entire cities/tribes/whatever were wiped out everywhere, but some had individuals survive. Which explains how "the last two people" could have kids who just happen to later have spouses and kids of their own without any explanation for where the new people came from.

They were just outside of walking distance.

Over the 300,000 plus years anatomically modern humans have been on Earth, that's probably happened a bunch. Hell, we've had 2-3 actual ice ages over that span.

We don't know shit about 250k of those years.

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From what I understand (and as a Christian), it's those Christians that take a literal reading of the Bible, not understanding that those parts of the Bible aren't meant to be read literally but are about the WHY of creation rather than the HOW. It's about WHO God is rather than how He did things.

[–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Either that or Genesis is just an explanation made up by a people group that had little to no idea how anything in the natural world works lol

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Child labor.

Despite progress, child labour still affects nearly 138 million children worldwide

https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/child-labour/>

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Affects is such a strange way to put it. Like, "they caught a case of child labor."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PocketPorky@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 day ago (19 children)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Easy to say, but I'd argue it's baked in.

“Fifty thousand years ago there were these three guys spread out across the plain and they each heard something rustling in the grass. The first one thought it was a tiger, and he ran like hell, and it was a tiger but the guy got away. The second one thought the rustling was a tiger and he ran like hell, but it was only the wind and his friends all laughed at him for being such a chickenshit. But the third guy thought it was only the wind, so he shrugged it off and the tiger had him for dinner. And the same thing happened a million times across ten thousand generations - and after a while everyone was seeing tigers in the grass even when there were`t any tigers, because even chickenshits have more kids than corpses do. And from those humble beginnings we learn to see faces in the clouds and portents in the stars, to see agency in randomness, because natural selection favours the paranoid. Even here in the 21st century we can make people more honest just by scribbling a pair of eyes on the wall with a Sharpie. Even now we are wired to believe that unseen things are watching us.”

― Peter Watts, Echopraxia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iii@mander.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

I kinda get it. Everyone needs something to look forwards too. Sadly, for some, there's only the idea of afterlife for that.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the USA: complicated tax returns that require tax software and/or professional help. It's a rent-seeking scam.

[–] gloktawasright@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Thank the fucking tax software lobbies for that. Assholes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Racism, but here we are in 2025 it being more prevalent than ever.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Racism will never die as we evolved to be tribal. Best we can do as a society is make it unacceptable. Which was happening when I grew up in 70s/80s America. Now we've backtracked and gone all-in with dog whistles.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

That's not true. Sure, we have tribalism, but there's no reason it has to be about race. It could be about religion, politics, country of origin, and countless other things

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tips. How ridiculous is it that restaurant owners guilt us into paying their employees salaries because they are too cheap to pay them a living wage? How unjust is it that we chose to tip the people who bring our food from the kitchen to our table and leave the hundreds of other service workers without tips?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sickday@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Every single fucking isp (at least in the states): nah

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On that note, Ben Shapiro as well.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Andrew Tate, though that may be dangerous as he'll probably turn into a martyr.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Private health insurance.

[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Una@europe.pub 8 points 1 day ago

mrrrreow mrrrreow meow :3

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought phone numbers and traditional telephone service would be dead by now. Instead, purely internet-based communication services often use them as an identifier.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 21 points 1 day ago
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the republican party in the us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The animals or the python thing?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Coal power plants.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Blockchain. It was an interesting poc, but it has yet to have a useful implementation apart from scams.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The oldest two mechanisms of authenticating on credit cards.

From oldest to newest, they are:

  1. Printed data on card.

  2. Magstrip (which basically has the same data in machine-readable form).

  3. Smartcard chip with contacts.

  4. Wireless.

The first two mechanisms hand over all the data required to impersonate the cardholder whenever used, which isn't very secure. Yes, there's value to keeping a mechanism around for a while to permit transition time, but we should have had tap-to-pay hardware on PCs and phones and the like a long time ago.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree that we should have a card reader on our computers for payments.

That is just a way too big of a security concern.

I prefer something like the Swedish system Swish, you have a separate app on your phone where you can send money to friends and family as well as pay for stuff online.

Sadly, while Klarna supports Swish, they require the use of a Klarna account to use it, and since most internet shops in Sweden uses Klarna it limits the ability to use it as I want to.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

and with that you need a smartphone, with a google-approved operating system and with it half of the factory bloatware, or otherwise you are barred from paying online, right? that sounds such a good idea.

no.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iii@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago
[–] Meeshall65@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Chat control and any similar legeslations

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago

Religion.

It served a purpose when societies were first moving from hunting and gathering to agriculture. A community needed to coalesce around something tangible for resource sharing, protection, decision making, etc...

It's why, from a societal evolution perspective, we went from totemic religions based on fertility and family groups, to mass religions with defined hierachies and roles, because the evolution or religions reflect that evolutions of society at the time.

We don't need that anymore. It does more harm than good in the modern world.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 6 points 10 hours ago

Well, facism seems like the obvious choice right now, but I'm going deeper and choosing bigotry.

Gender essentialism and tuberculosis

load more comments
view more: next ›