I think the idea that forced brevity is an important component of microblogging is mistaken. Low friction to post, minimal formatting, and (optionally) collapsed long posts in feeds all encourage short posts without requiring them.
It might have served more of a purpose when Twitter launched because people weren't in the habit of short text posts at the time, and because Twitter supported posting via SMS.
I don't see value in a character limit other than whatever might be needed for technical reasons. Bluesky allows alt text for images to be 2000 characters, so clearly any technical limitations allow at least that much.
For those who prefer short text posts, hiding posts longer than a user-configurable setting behind a "see more" link would do.
Yet they still think it's a good idea to limit text posts to 300 characters for reasons I cannot fathom.
That annoying “Fediverse chick” thing
I got a DM on Mastodon from that account; I didn't realize it was spam. It was on an account that gets a modest amount of interaction from strangers, so I didn't pay much attention to it.
if Reddit bans the word “luigi” both subreddits are affected
Several people have responded with things like this, but OP didn't ask about that scenario. Of course federation solves that problem.
the need for a Fediverse wide fix being your opinion to be necessary for Lemmy to not be eventually destroyed as a whole
I think it's more likely that Lemmy will stay niche than grow large enough to have an eternal September problem. If it does grow large, I think the risk is more a degraded experience than destruction.
I’m not understanding your point here. Can you reword it perhaps?
If I'm not happy with how /r/knives is run on Reddit, I can make /r/knife to compete with it.
The modlog entries I’ve read show the offending comment as well as the moderator given reason for a ban.
It shows part of the comment. I think there's a limit on length, and it does not show media. The mod log is a good idea, but there's room for improvement.
Where I’ll disagree with you that one has to exist or Lemmy will fail.
I never said Lemmy will fail, and that is not my position.
its easy to create an identically named community on another instance
It's easy to create a differently named community on systems that don't have this sort of server-based namespacing.
Modlog documents all actions including moderator censorship.
The part that's missing is the original content mods removed. If I'm an abusive moderator and I want to censor someone, I'm not going to put "I don't like your opinion" in the removal/ban reason; I'm going to put something that sounds reasonable like "racism" or "harassment".
Beehaw is an example of a Lemmy instance immune to “Eternal September”
Time will tell. Either way, that's not a solution for Lemmy as a whole.
I agree, but the server owner imposing unpopular rules is not one of the two problems the OP asks about. Those are:
Decentralization with federated servers does not address those problems.
Decentralization provides a lot of important benefits, such as protection against worsening the whole system for profit, or imposing unpopular network-wide rules. I like it here; it's fun in the way the old web was and the corporate web isn't.
I think we're in agreement that preventing moderators of popular communities from being assholes and handling large-scale abuse as OP asked about are not among those benefits.
And people wonder why I have no interest in getting a newer phone with an AI thing on it.
That does not appear to be the problem OP was asking about.
There is a chance that I just don't get microblogging. I've always felt that short character limits encourage people to make bad points that resonate emotionally but fall apart when thought through, and to yell at people they disagree with rather than being thoughtful.