this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
681 points (95.1% liked)

Political Memes

9400 readers
2825 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen a depressing trend of Democratic politicians embracing anti trans talking points and compromising gender affirming care for young people. This is extremely concerning as states and the federal government are undermining access to care now more than ever. Democrats standing by trans people has far more dire consequences now than ever, yet we're being treated as politically disposable by people who used to campaign on lgbtq issues like Gavin Newsom and Pete Buttigieg.

I can't say I'm surprised. Liberal papers like the New York Times has been uncritically promoting unscientific transphobia for years that claims alternatives exist to gender affirming care. My guess is that people see a person transitioning as an unfortunate thing, desperately wishing there was another way. They ignore the fact that gender affirming care is both the best treatment for dysphoria, and one of the most successful treatments for any mental condition ever discovered.

To put it simply, making gender affirming care harder to obtain for kids will kill many of them. Kids being kept from care by their parents already drives people to suicide, and a slimy politician preventing supportive parents from helping their kids will do the same. Every time I see people claim these guys are our best shot at beating fascism, I die inside. I have no doubt that they'll eventually axe care for all adults like everyone who was originally "worried about fairness in sports" is currently pushing for. The only way they won't is if we make it a costly issue for them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 71 points 22 hours ago

none of us are free until all of us are free.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 34 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I've seen a depressing trend of Democratic politicians embracing anti trans talking points and compromising gender affirming care for young people.

Burn the DNC to the ground, these impotent acts of betrayal of the voting base that fail to meaningfully activate anyone in return are the unmistakable indicators of a terminal disease in the party.

The sooner we do it, the sooner we can start building a real party on the left in the US.

This isn't redeemable or reformable.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 9 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Make a third party that appeals regionally at first than expand nationwide to replace the democrats.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

It’s a mathematical certainty that any work on a third party will only help the party that it is most unlike. Seriously, you aren’t the first to think “fuck it, let’s just have a NEW party.” You will spend your days actively harming your interests until you die. And here’s the part where you tell me it needs to get worse before it gets better. No, it doesn’t. It needs to get better incrementally over long time scales and that is the ONLY way anything has ever improved anywhere. Do the work. This nonsense about burning down the world over a single issue is performative crap we don’t have time for.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is why first-past-the-post needs to be replaced with the single transferable vote. The rules were originally designed by the rich for the rich.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

If you believe that’s where your energy is best spent, I wish you success. It’s probably a matter of planting trees whose shade you’ll never sit in, but there are healthy alternatives we can promote.

Starting a third party in a FPTP system? That’s just suicide.

There is another way: run for office as a Democrat and be the change you want to see in the party. What Bernie and AOC did. We need a few dozen more of them, and things will actually start moving.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

the proper way is to do a hostile takeover of the Democratic party.

Trump wasn't really a Republican, he was a nationalist (in 2016) and now a fascist (in 2024.) Republicans were neocons, libertarians and classical conservatives.

in 2017 he purged the actual Republicans from the Party, and filled its hollowed husk with MAGA. by 2024, the takeover was complete. actual Republicans (e.g. Liz Cheney, Romney) abandoned ship. the name is the only thing that stayed the same.

so, we need to do the same with the DNC. the formula is simple. hijack the primaries, shove the existing leadership out and show the Republicans what "socialism" really means.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Trans rights are human rights. What would be the point of opposing fascism if it's not to uphold human rights?

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

because it's worse for business than neoliberalism was. The rich agreed to fascism because they needed to redirect populist sentiment, but the neoliberal model really was optimal for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Giving up on trans rights is the definition of losing to fascism.

Fascism is an ideology that's turtules all the way down. Once you exclude one group you have built the social infrastructure and mechanisms to exclude any other group. The only defense is to accept and include all groups.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 15 hours ago

This. This is how genocide operates. The number of bystanders gets lower and lower as they are carted off into the camps or turn full blown fascist. It’s always like this. Armenia. Germany. Rwanda. It’s a set script.

RFK has made no secret of wanting to take away meds from mentally ill people and putting them into farming camps.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Mamdani needs to become mayor of New York already to show these clown democrats how to do their jobs.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They are doing their jobs. They aren't stupid, they just don't work for us.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

And we shouldn't be voting for anyone who won't work for us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

You guys don't get it. We need to concede the civil rights of a marginalized group to defeat fascism!

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 13 hours ago

if the Social Democrats would just concede the Jewish Question, they could have kept the Nazis out of power!

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but it is kinda funny how every time people start to get close to attacking capitalism or supporting socialists rising in power, suddenly there's a big wave of hate and outrage at trans people, gay people, migrants, etc.

It's almost like they want us to butt-heads with a majority of the population about issues that population will never budge on because the average American has the attention span and compassion of a broken chunk of drywall and only know how to fight.

I have been saying this for a long time, do not abandon advocacy for the rights of marginalized people, but if we want to actually bend society to protecting and respecting those rights, we have to bend it against corporate influence, we have to elect anti-oligarchs, socialists and economic progressives to our local seats of power and influence, we have to kick the legs out from under the foundation of the system that will come for trans people, it will come for gay people, it will come for brown, black and interracial couples, it will come for the mentally handicapped and it will come for women and children, it will come for your video games and your weed and your furry art. One-by-one, every single right and freedom will be lost if we don't start using our strongest weapon against their most vulnerable weak-point, which is by not spending money on luxuries, saving cash away from the banks and corporations who want to "borrow" it.

Our interpersonal narratives with each other need to keep focusing on how the wealthy are the ones making us hate each other, they're the ones driving up the price of eggs, they're the ones making us scared of trans people, they're the ones running congress and senate, they're the ones making gas cost so much, they're the ones taking chunks out of our paychecks and giving us NOTHING in return.

Again, all anyone knows how to do is argue and fight so we have to channel that at the right targets instead of meeting it head-on or we will keep getting stuck in this spiral that has seen only losses in the last decade.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Your "reasoned" argument to "slow down", "don't rock the boat" or "be patient" for social justice would be familiar to Civil Rights activists. MLK suggested that the "white moderate" was a bigger obstacle to civil rights than the white citizens council.

What you're really saying is that class struggle takes priority over social justice. The big problem with that is that social justice has never came to people who who politely sit at the back of the bus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Welcome to your civilization. Where your rights are used to further agendas.

Edit:Not Progress

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I get it, but conservatism has taken over by ratcheting the country to the right. They've been patiently putting people in positions of power from dog catcher up to the presidency for the last forty years.

Progressives aren't satisfied with ratcheting the country to the left. It's all or nothing.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

The country never moves towards the left or anything closely resembling egalitarianism in any meaningful way. Gay marriage has been one of the few major wins in recent history, but that's not "ratcheting the country to the left". You could be the most staunch supporter of capitalism and "free markets" in the world, literally the opposite of egalitarianism, and still support trans and gay rights/be socially liberal.

Progressives aren’t satisfied with ratcheting the country to the left. It’s all or nothing.

The Democrats aren't satisfied until the country is completely to the right and they aren't interested in winning elections or seriously fighting MAGA - their focus is firmly on suppressing the left.

Progressives do not hold significant power in elected office or in the DNC. Bernie Sanders had two primaries rigged against him, and David Hogg was recently ousted from his position as Vice Chair of the DNC ~~for gender diversity reasons~~ because he was pushing progressive primary challengers.

Ken Martin also ensured DNC officer neutrality in future primaries this year, in order to neuter David Hogg not long after he committed to funding these challengers (which is likely why David Hogg refused to run for re-election). Democrats only have a problem with rigging primaries when progressives are the ones getting support.

Progressives are unpredictable and difficult to control, may be of the socialist variety, and disincentivize major donors - which the DNC and Democratic party rely on.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If every time you give in to their demands and they take a step further to the right and ask for more with the intention of surviving to fight to protect what you value another day, you will eventually lose what you value and have nothing left to defend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

As an AAPI kid, I am more than used to liberals and leftists abandoning and shitting on us at the drop of a hat. In a just world? That wouldn't fucking happen. In the world we live in? I'll settle for not being actively attacked. Let us fight the slow burn fight just don't actively harm. Just so long as it wins elections and does overall harm mitigation.

But that isn't the case. Democrats increasingly try to be "republican lite" and it just doesn't fucking work. Because the DNC seems to believe the bullshit that the republicans are full of "bush era republicans" and "mavericks" who all hate what the party has become and are just looking for an opportunity to do the right thing. And they completely ignore that all those "mavericks" still vote lockstep with the magats (barring one or two personal issues) because they actually also want the hate and suffering but don't like that it isn't them who are leading the charge.

But when one candidate is running on the gas chamber for all trans people and the other candidate just wants to rough them up a bit? The hateful shitheads aren't going to settle for less. But to everyone else? "Both sides suck".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

Democrats should really just embrace pro-gun politics and win over both right-wingers and left-wing gun owners.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

They're neoliberals so they can't say the obvious things a Dem candidate needs to do to win an election.

They'd rather a Republican win than a Dem who actually wants to fix wealth inequality

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 22 hours ago

Yes, this 💯. They’re drunk on corpo dollars.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Not what they mean at all. It's just that social issues are secondary to winning the war.

This means putting it off until Conservatives can no longer stop us.

(Not trans btw, just believe in trans right)

[–] piefood@feddit.online 16 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Their strategy is currently losing the war, as well as social issues

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

My FB feed is still littered with die-hard liberals espousing views we could afford to debate 15, 20 years ago. Pollution and gun rights. Every word they say is heard differently by the other side and they still don't get it. Fascists are taking over the US and they want to figure out how to recycle better.

load more comments (3 replies)

Thanks. Glad I'm here for you to sacrifice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 9 points 16 hours ago

That's like saying they need to give up on the mentally and intellectually handicapped in order to fight the original Nazis... it was who they killed first!

[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago

Ratchet effect, in real time. This is what harm reduction and blue no matter who buys you. Democrats are not your friend. The system cannot be reformed. We cannot vote our way out of this. Trans people need to arm up. Allies need to arm up. Look out for one another. Stay safe and good luck.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Honestly and in all seriousness, I don't think trans rights matter enough to drop them. Like these people aren't in favor of e.g. trump because of trans rights. They are in favor of trump. Why? There is no actual reason. We are talking about people who want the death penalty and a small government??? Who want to cut spending and vote for the guy who spends more money??? they are worried about the quality of life of workers and vote ice cold capitalist into power??? Trans rights don't matter for them, it is a story that they can tell themselves. It is a "reason" because "idk i am just really frustrated and I don't know how to deal with the mental discomfort of acknowledging that my behavior especially my political behavior supported the creation of the situation that I strongly dislike" just isn't comfortable for them.

Trans rights are more extremely important but politically, they just don't matter. Dropping them will change nothing, but make us worse people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The standards you walk by are the ones you accept.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

I think its extremely uncommon to say we have to sacrifice trans rights

More commonly some people say trans rights are a fringe issue not necessary to defeat fascism, and slightly less common yo say trans rights were never even on the table.

If you have to pick between an anti-trans dnc and a Republican then you're gonna be voting on some other issue like whether or not to bring back Gulags and if the lower 90% should be able to afford housing or food or healthcare.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We dont have to give up on any single group to fight MAGA morons. Just start calling MAGA what they are, the pedo party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't defeating fascism and standing for trans rights the same thing?

Same with eliminating religion?

These organisations aren't good for human rights. They aren't good for anything or anyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›