this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
569 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3286 readers
1050 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Monday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to use racial profiling in its militarized immigration raids across Los Angeles, halting an injunction that had barred officers from targeting Latinos based on ethnicity. The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order, which appeared to split 6–3 along ideological lines. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the decision was “unconscionably irreconcilable with our nation’s constitutional guarantees,” opening the door to violent persecution of Latinos—including American citizens—by “masked agents with guns.” The majority did not respond to this extraordinary charge, perhaps because it is so obviously true.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (19 children)

It's time to purge the Supreme Court. It's clear that they don't give a shIt about the law or the constitution. They are the activist judges the Republicans always whined about.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People put out these ideas, but I rarely see who or how they’d like them to be implemented. Who would you want to initiate the purge? Any democrat president fine?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Expanding the court is the generally anticipated way to do that

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are several examples from antiquity that show that the people will solve the problem of the government doesn't.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (13 children)

The vast majority of the time, the replacement ends up being worse. It's tricky business overthrowing a government, and the ones that end up on top are usually the most bloodthirsty and least ethical.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

There’s a mechanism for impeaching Supreme Court justices, which would apply to the six criminals.

Or, just ignore them and start a parallel court. If they won’t do their job, why keep listening to them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Runaway@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I think it's time to purge the whole govt and try again. The system is clearly broken beyond repair

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Yes. When the wealthy and powerful have everything and the rest have nothing the rest burn the system down and start again.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 day ago

Every accusation is a confession

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is tyranny. Literal and explicit, without exaggeration.

Understand that and act accordingly.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

The court did not address the worst rights violations: the ice agents refused to return the victims' Real ID (driver's license) and they probably copied his phone.

Meaning after taking his ID they can then indefinitely incarcerate him for not having ID. They can also prevent him from driving because he does not have a driver's license.

And they added his data to a criminal database along with all of his social contacts and communication.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order

Cool that they can just do this.

[–] aquafunk@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 19 hours ago

If they don't have to explain themselves, then they shouldn't expect one when the angry mob shows up at their door 🤷

[–] philosloppy@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

yeah, it turns out unelected, lifetime appointees with the power to interpret the law with no oversight was a bad idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the alien anthropologists find the burnt out husk of our world in the (not so far) future and try to figure out what the hell happened, I hope they find Sotomayor's writings and realize not everyone was batshit crazy.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mateofeo85@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

People will study the art of your memes.

[–] thebudman420@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Did they just erase the 14th Amendment and made it null and void? https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv I get it now. It says no State and not no federal. Federal is not a State.

"Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I am not a lawyer so don't take this as legal advice. However it seems to me that the Supreme Court really doesn't give a shit about the law, the Constitution, or our rights.

[–] thebudman420@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

We have all been figuring that out what every constitutional right not honored shit on one after another.

[–] Runaway@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean the decision to give presidents immunity from the law made that glaringly obvious

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They gutted the 14th when they allowed Trump to run. They also used it to justify corporate personhood. Facists don’t really uphold anything ever except their own corruption and bigotry.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Terry stop was deemed legal in 1960s. This was expected as long a white people are safe or not effected.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never heard of that before so for others:

A Terry stop in the United States allows the police to briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity. Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard than probable cause which is needed for arrest.

Wikipedia link.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago

It starts with Latinos, it won't end there.

Thanks there Latino's for Trump.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As an outsider I'm genuinely shocked. So much for the melting pot. :(

The fact that the conservatives didn't bother to explain their reasoning is entirely damning.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"Because we can."

[–] ReallyAngryNerd@europe.pub 12 points 21 hours ago

Nazis gonna nazi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a brown person. Yeah this is not new, America’s mask is just off now.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

What, you think people weren't just bidding on George Zimmerman's paintings for his artistic capacity? Incidentally, someone who would have been prime illegal ICE detainment material had he not signaled as he did to the MAGA crowd. I imagine he's their "one good Hispanic".

[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Make America Gestapo Again

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Supreme Court is a joke but the clowns are not really funny, more like sad and pathetic.

As it does not really matter what happens as long as "our side" wins, republican voters won't give a fuck. Also does not help that they are a bunch of stupid bigots that will cheer on this "decision".

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet all the latinos that voted for Trump are thrilled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The judges are owned by the federalist society, groomed and chosen from law school for siding with the party and the half century plans to end the republic in all but name for a one party plutocratic state.

Prez just hijacked the party, and whipped them into line again recently disparraging the very association that put them there.

The in crowd is rightfully worried about getting thrown out of the club. They also probably have some scandals on these judges the society holds to encourage their allegiance.

Much as the fitting historical parrallel, the borgia pope in the 16th century, the one machivelli based his prince on, the spanish pope nominated cardinals that he had compromised with prostitutes, and compromised existing ones.

We need focus on the federalist society, they are calling the shots or at least making the draft picks. They are also up to expanding the same secret society model to other areas, a federalist society for everything as Leonard Leo sold it, and got gifted I forget a billion or several from some chicago magnate dickhead in his old age, ul-something, ulrich maybe idk.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

For us it begins at the grassroots. We don't have billionaires willing to create a national organization. So form small liberal groups, and then network them together. I'm serious. I started a group for queer men last year, now I am taking over the entire progressive scene in my state by creating an overarching organization that connects over a dozen key players (ACLU, Prides, migrant and trans organizations). If we did this in every area, and then networked THEM... well shit we'd have a base of power and even fundraising capabilities. IDK what else to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't wait until the people start fighting back violently.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Us Americans are not gonna protest. We are to busy looking at memes

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

Agents? How could you possibly know?

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 21 hours ago

At least no Latinos voted for Trump, right? Right?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 13 points 1 day ago

It passed with 66.6% of supreme court judges voting in favour.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am SO FUCKING GRUMPY after reading this as the first thing I saw waking up today

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

I saw this coming. The SCOTUS is already compromised.

[–] beccaboben@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"I guess it's time to get into tanning" -white LA allies hopefully

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 7 points 20 hours ago

If this shitcircus was only affecting the US i wouldn't care, but it's not.

load more comments
view more: next ›