this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
57 points (96.7% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1254 readers
415 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

To quote from the article and save you the click (edited to align with sub rules- link has direct wording):

"Former (political) strategist Stuart Stevens believes (everyone) should (place) President Donald Trump's Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem around the (WH)'s necks — and he has an idea how they could do it.

Stevens, who long ago abandoned (his former party) over Trump and has urged a fighting stance against his agenda, weighed in on the subject on X in response to a clip of Noem claiming, with no evidence, that "I do know that LA wouldn't be standing today if President Trump hadn't taken action" and deployed federal troops to the city in response to anti-deportation protests....

... "when I was a (political) operative, we loved to label (the other side) as unpatriotic," Stevens continued. "Which is what (everyone) should do. No (one) who voted to confirm this willfully ignorant fool can call themselves a patriot." "

A chorus of voices would have a strong impact, don't you think- add this to your messaging!


Originally Posted By u/Future_Usual_8698 At 2025-09-02 07:21:16 AM | Source


top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 21 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I guess you could call a fascist nazi without empathy that helps pedophiles, and shoots dogs "unpatriotic" instead. But I think calling her a fascist nazi without empathy that helps pedophiles, and shoots dogs is a bit more accurate

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 20 hours ago

Nah they put too much work into painting nazi fascism as "patriotic." Doing this would be a direct threat to their agenda and it's more likely to make people stop drinking nazi fascism koolaid

[–] chaos@beehaw.org 7 points 20 hours ago

More accurate, yes, but most people hear stuff like "fascist Nazi" and go "nah, it can't be that bad" and chalk it up to partisan name-calling. A milder but more believable insult has a better chance of making a person actually think about it.