Yup. I had an iPhone 6S that was affected by this. When the battery was starting to get older, things like opening the camera would sometimes just cause the phone to die. I got the battery replaced for free, but flipping it to throttle instead of randomly shut itself down was an improvement, and likely extended the usable lives of the affected phones, not artificially shorten them. It shouldn't have been done secretly but it wasn't a conspiracy to sell more iPhones.
chaos
joined 2 years ago
It's possible for the rich and poor to both suffer. Of course, when the rich "suffer" that mostly means they can't have all the new things they want and have to settle for the excess they already have. When the poor suffer, they're devastated and unable to live a decent life.
(Yes, the rich get richer by stealing from the poor. A worker at Amazon causes $N to be paid to the company from her efforts, but Amazon will pay her less than $N so they can make money. The difference goes to the rich, whose only contribution was having their name on the paperwork. Billions and billions of dollars flowing toward people who are doing, at best, hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of actual work themselves. There aren't enough hours in the day to earn the money these people are raking in. It should be going to the people actually doing the work.)
I mean, yeah, I said they should've told people, that was a bad decision on their part. I'm just saying if it was a conspiracy to sell more iPhones, it was a dumb one, because the net effect was to make the phone more usable. It wasn't crippled, certainly not more than "this thing just shuts down when the camera is opened sometimes."