this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
119 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63843 readers
492 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most other search engines show https://www.southparkuncensored.com/ after searching for "south park uncensored" or "southparkuncensored", but Bing doesn't, and therefore DuckDuckGo and Qwant neither.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Is it a surprise? Bing is controlled by M$, and their search results are taken by Qwant and DDG. Ecosia also runs with google results so it isn't affected.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, i tried using qwant and they just straight up deny me access because using a VPN apparently is "suspicious".

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 9 hours ago

I mean they're not wrong... Their motives are suspicious, so you use a VPN. 😁

[–] southernwolf@pawb.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Brave Search also returns results for it just fine as well. Which makes sense given they run with their own indexing now (with fallbacks to Google and Bing only when requested).

[–] upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

DDG is more of a privacy frontend for Bing then its own search engine. Typically if its not on Bing its not gonna be on DDG.

Works on both Brave and Google via Mullvad Leta

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (7 children)

Damn shame. I use DDG, but them consistently fucking up makes me want to switch. Though i don't know of any alternatives.

edit: thanks for the recommendations!

[–] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 24 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Kagi. Privacy focussed, no ads, and excellent results with options for sorting preferred sources to appear at the top, or not. Costs money but man, it’s fast and good in the way Google was back in the day. Some plans also include anonymous access to a variety of LLMs though they are older models, and if they can run them locally, they do. Really liking it.

[–] troed@fedia.io 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

FWIW the founder of Kagi is adamant that subscribers must accept part of the subscruption money being sent to Russia (Yandex, fully govt-controlled) and has refused all attempts at excluding it. When questions started appearing he even tried claiming Yandex isn't even russian.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] july@leminal.space 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Ngl I don’t get these people always being like “Source?”

Just look it up bruh it takes less time than to comment

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 14 points 12 hours ago

Just look it up bruh it takes less time than to comment

Source?

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago

Asking the person who purports to be an expert on the situation to provide some context is much faster than someone who knows nothing about it, like myself, trying to find it.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 9 hours ago

Yea, it's gets to sounding like playground argument tactics "nuh uh!" (which is basically sophistry).

Even when I'm being genuinely curious these days, I try to ask for a source by making it a convo, like "do you remember where you came across that or what should I search for to get good results", instead of "source?".

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

I'll give the trial a go, thank you for the recommendation

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Which country are Kagi servers hosted in?

[–] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Dunno. Check their about page, but appears to be through GCP?

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I swapped to Kagi this month. It's refreshing. I'll probably end up on the $10/month plan. They also have a library pilot program I'm trying to get my academic library to look into.

[–] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

I used it for almost a year at the lowest tier, then got the couples plan more recently and it has high spouse approval factor, even though there was some initial setup

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

https://leta.mullvad.net/ uses Brave or Google

https://searx.space/ uses any of the big search engines you want, you do have to pick an instance

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 3 points 16 hours ago

https://leta.mullvad.net/ uses Brave or Google

thanks for this one. i'm currently trying out their encrypted and adblocking dns on the hotspot i set up on dietpi to isolate 'streaming' devices, comparing its effectiveness to pihole and adguard home.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

Thanks! I think i'm set on searxng + some other stuff i'd like to try.

[–] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Best one is probably (in my opinion) selfhosting a searxng instance. It takes results from a dozen of engines (you configure which ones) and merges them according to the configured weights and some algorithmic magic.

If you use public instances, the owner might have tuned the results to suit themselves and it returns garbage for your usecase. And also they frequently get timeouts because a lot of people use them. So don't get turned off by trying a couple of them.

Since I started running my own private instance I am super happy with the search results.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago

Thanks for the recommendation!

[–] Tinkerer@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

+1 i have my own searxng instance on my lan that I access via my headscale VPN setup. Love it.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yacy? You can self host if you want.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I've heard of it before but never dug into it, will do. Thanks

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago

Its not great if I'm honest. But it does work!

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Startpage is similarly anonymous, but it uses Google search

[–] lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

And is owned by an ad company afaik

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, they advertise using only the context of the keywords of your current search. No storing of personal data, no profiling. They've had third parties review that. Seems fine to me.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

Startpage's majority shareholder is System1 who is an adtech company. We don't believe that to be an issue as they have a distinctly separate privacy policy. The Privacy Guides team reached out to Startpage back in 2020 to clear up any concerns with System1's sizeable investment into the service, and we were satisfied with the answers we received.

From privacyguides.org

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I literally told you months ago I have a SearXNG instance up, you fucking knob.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eodur@piefed.social 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] eodur@piefed.social 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I guess you are supporting my assertion?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean yeah, this is a screenshot of the search results. It is weird that there is a reddit post asking to see the opposite above the desired page which just needed the TLD added. But still, the page in question is in the search results.

Not sure why I got a downvote, but I don't mind being unpopular.

[–] eodur@piefed.social 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

In context it felt like a rebuttal, but with the link clearly shown. Maybe a comment to help clarify next time?

For the record, I deprioritize reddit so the actual link is on top for me.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 4 points 8 hours ago

This is the problem with social media, especially Lemmy and Reddit. It is the default stance to assume a neutral comment is hostile. Why do we all argue so much? I've been there, but I'm trying to be kinder online. I think it's a systemic problem and I don't know the solution.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How do you do that in Kagi?

[–] eodur@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

Click on the shield icon on the right, then the "down shield" icon in the resulting popup. Or you can block the site entirely!

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Context is needed. What is that site? And why do you believe search results about it are being censored?

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

To be honest, the poster is "SPU," so this is probably 90% to promote the site. (Not that I really care that much in this case, I like South Park and think episodes that have Muhammad in them should still be available despite religious extremists being upset.)

[–] spu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

More like 97% addressing and countering censorship. Other than the remaining 3% that undeservedly strokes my ego I personally have nothing to gain by promoting the site in itself; no ads, no tracking, no donations.

I was simply surprised and disgusted by search results being censored on DDG and Qwant and thought others would like to know this too.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You should be using SearXNG anyway.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

To be fair, SearXNG still queries DuckDuckGo, QWant an Bing by default, I suspect Google does the same thing so Startpage would be out as well.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 6 hours ago

With default settings it still fetches southparkuncensored.com for me. It might query those engines, but it also queries other ones by default as well.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

AFAIK, Yandex doesn't censor piracy stuff.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

....Yandex, you mean Russia?

[–] Peter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah. It's unacceptable. Still, I dare to say (and I hate to say it), Yandex has the best search engine index by far.

load more comments
view more: next ›