this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17237 readers
1395 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

AI photography is so stupid. That target's got legs. Handsome ones, too.

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's just the new range staffer holding the target. Materials are expensive with the tariffs and all, so you gotta cut costs somewhere.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

That's the intern not a staffer. Kind of you to assume they are people.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

Also they all hold the bows completely wrong.

Angled arm, turned the wrong side, wtf?

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surely it'd be easy to just find an actual stock photo to use here. But it doesn't matter because the background just needed to be Whatever.

That write-up is well worth the read.

[–] memfree@beehaw.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On your advice, I read it. Good essay. Yes, the image is Whatever, but the creative part for this post was the pun, so I still gave it an upvote because I haven't heard it death.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I upvoted it too

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

☺️

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Looks like foreground guy is drawing across range.

I think he's going for the live target holding a target.

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

The joke is they failed to isolate the variable

[–] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago

ohh, tanks!

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If the second group performed "far better" team the first group then this isn't regression to the mean, is it? I would expect the gap to be much less or even eliminated but for the Plus C Bow group to do much better there should be something else at play, right?

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, plus the selection process was weird. Any gains attributed to the plus-C bow group just throws question to the initial rankings.

They should have done a crossover trial, where group A is a random selection of archers initially getting no C bows, and then later getting them, and vice versa for group B. Paired t-tests, y'all!

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the meme is a joke about how you can prove anything with regression to the mean. If all archers are equally good and we test them we would get varying results. If we then split them on performance and perform an intervention and test again then the "poor performing" group will do much better. Because it's just random noise.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

Oh I see, thanks

[–] Emi@ani.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah, so much so that people believe this meme is reality, even though google turns up not a single result for "plus c bow effect" that has anything to do with archery. Neither does any google search on the story.

The whole post is placebo, aka pure AI slop.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Image: Bad AI.

Text: Bad AI.

Source: Bad AI.

Neither the name of the effect nor the story turn up any results on google.

This is not a science meme, but instead a "My first AI meme".

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

Image: Bad AI (true)

Text: I'll bet it's written by a human.

Source: It's a joke!

See other comments if you missed it

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy users not crying about AI challenge: impossible

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AI users not giving me eye cancer challenge: impossible

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

RIP your eyes friend, who knew something so inconsequential would ruin them so badly. I hope you find peace in blindness.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

Lemmy users crying about AI seems to be as common as AI users calling themselves creative. I wonder if there’s a correlation?

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'm still deciding if the payoff was worth the buildup.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am astounded how many commenters don't seem to get the pun

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

It got reports for it. πŸ₯Ή

[–] xcutie@linux.community 0 points 2 months ago

So bad that it is good again.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Confusing-ass perspective. It looks like all the archers are standing with their left foot forward and holding the bow in their right hand.