It has been hotly debated, mostly in regards to Greece and Türkiye, who have been at each other's throats for decades. In that case, the aggressor likely wouldn't be obvious and both are likely to claim article 5. Their relations to other NATO members are also a lot more ambiguous, some favoring one, some the other.
In the case of a rogue USA attacking Canada, or Denmark, I believe the case would be a lot clearer.
Close, except it's himself coming up with the idea. His kids are smarter than that
That's not correct. "Mining" is a reward structure for people processing transactions. Every transaction costs a lot of energy
Of course it applies! Where are you getting that it doesn't from?
That sounds like you're planning to waste a bunch of people's time. Not sure what your intent is, but if label it correctly (as AI), few people are going to talk to it like a person, and if you don't, that's a dick move and will also get you banned.
If you want to talk to bots just go on reddit or twitter /s
Stil secure it, in case the pigs search your home after arresting you. But don't take it to a protest
For longer missions it helps to be able to re-calibrate, as with dead-reckoning, the errors cumulate