this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
228 points (98.7% liked)

News

31776 readers
2883 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago

I got back into reading in the last couple of years. I was already reading a bit more, but it cranked up when I got a job with a lot of downtime. Plus, finding a topic that is endlessly interesting helps: first two-hundred years of christianity. (I’m an atheist and a history nerd.)

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obviously the Internet plays a big role in this as people have said, but it's worth mentioning this was also the era where tv stopped sucking (from reality tv awfulness to a bunch of absolute banger dramas), AND where Netflix and then other streaming services became available. So there are huge competition effects.

I've also never bought fully into the "reading good TV bad" mindset. Leisure is leisure, especially if the article's raised point is "identifying with literary characters". That certainly happens in other forms of media. Even if it's reading to learn, I watch a LOT of YouTube these days, and probably 75% of what I watch is how to and instructional. Also let's not forget with each new form of leisure: "fast-paced music" (classical), books for the masses, magazines, tv, jazz, rock and roll, DnD, the internet, VR etc....there was always someone saying the new stuff will rot your brain while they pine for something that was maligned when it was new.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

If anything the internet makes reading easier than ever. It's not hard to download a small eBook file on your phone for free.

[–] uhdeuidheuidhed@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 days ago

That makes a lot of sense.

This might make some of you uncomfortable, but it seems like this coincides with women's adoption of tech and social media.

Women already read at way higher rates than men, but since so many of them are swept up in the social media hysteria, they literally don't have time or patience to do it any more.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Interesting. I made an active choice to read more a few years ago, and now I'm reading more thani ever did before. I'm at 25 books so far this year, averaging over 600k pages each. Although many of those are audio books during my long commute, I'm still getting the stories.

[–] Hackworth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Gmork would be pleased.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

We can't extrapolate data from "Americans" to say "people in general" like this title does.

Americans and declining education is not a new phenomenon nor is it global. Americans are also not role models for anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There's so much worse happening to society, so many more important things the media and "studies" could be pushing.

Why isn't this article about the growth in the wage gap between lowest paid and highest at companies between those years.

Why isn't it about the fact we're in a new dark age of war where starvation (Gaza) and chemical weapons (Ukraine) are being used.

"Wouldn't it be nice if people read more"

Yes, but shut the fuck up and turn your media clout to something more important. Fix the quality of life and justice issues.

The Neo-Liberal force of the media and academia are largely misapplied to both-siding Capitalism and the Capitalist Fascism it's produced, and I'm sick of it.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Your post is why I read.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›