this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
327 points (86.9% liked)

politics

25340 readers
2593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 124 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Do I like seeing him fuck with Trump? Yes.

Is he a dirty neo liberal? Yes.

Would I support him in a primary for President in 2028? Probably not. I sure hope someone better shows up.

Would I support him if he won the Democratic primary? Yes. Assuming we get elections. Assuming the DNC hasn't fully fractured and a third party candidate cannot reasonably win.

Would he fix our country? No. See item 2.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk. Its not hard, people.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (31 children)

Good take. Maybe the Kamala protest abstainers will have a fresh enough dose of Trumpism to remember that halfway-kind-of-decent-sometimes is better than literally-the-worst-possible-decision-at-all-times. I hope we still have elections. I hope we are not stuck with Newsom as the only choice. But if we are, he IS the only choice, and even though he's not nearly a progressive, he is far closer to it than whatever the GOP rolls out with in 3 years (whether it is Trump again, Trump Jr., Vance, or a new piece of shit far right authoritarian). We need to make sure he wins, and that means getting your asses to the booth. All of us. Even you.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I desperately wish it was this straightforward to the majority of people who shape our future in this country.

I am firmly convinced that most of our population doesn't have internal language, no internal tools for abstracting ideas into mental words for comparison and evaluation, and just spout rhetoric by instinct. Literally, this is why everyone seems so stupid... they've changed the way their minds work by scrolling all day, every day, and not socializing and not changing habits.

Nuance is something that you can only arrive at if you have this mental narrative tool that lets you see multiple angles of an issue.

This means that our future of politics is going to be entirely grifters riding on this fact and creating over-the-top caricatures and WWE theater style politics. And people will eat it up because everyone just wants something to be all-in for or all-against so they can fight with the opposing fans. We're so fucking cooked.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hubbubbub@fedia.io 74 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Don't care. He's not a fascist and that's enough right now.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

This is a huge problem in mindset in my opinion. Yes he's better than Trump. But I can grab a random person off the streets and they'd probably clear that bar. Our economic and political systems will always pool power into fewer and fewer peoples hands. We need drastic rethinking of how our society is going to work because Newsom will 100% sales out the American people when the rubber meets the profits. The old system are dead. We are just experiencing the symptoms and only wanting to stop the pain. Not cure the sickness.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 59 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Newsom is your average neoliberal. As much as I like seeing someone troll Krasnov it's important to remember that neoliberals are not going to help anyone but themselves and their corporate donors.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’ll take the neo-liberal over the outright nazi fascist, thanks

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 16 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Well, history has shown that your fellow Americans do not agree with you. There is plenty of time to find a candidate that will actually be popular with voters

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah but he's one of the few Democrats actually doing something against Trump and co.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inkrifle@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago (8 children)

So sick of the division amongst the left. He is far from perfect, but I'd much rather take a neoliberal over a fascist.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 32 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Jesus Christ he hasn’t even announced he’s running yet. Why are we already pretending these are the only two alternatives?

We don’t need to choose a neoliberal over a fascist… we can push for someone better.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

With all due respect, as I understand where this sentiment comes from, that is how Trump gained momentum and won.

I think the blue no matter who approach has failed more than worked considering Hillary failed, Biden did win but really it was more Trump lost, Kamala lost (she got a shit deal yeah but still neolib vs unchained Trump should have been a no contest) and going further back Gore and Kerry lost to Bush. Clinton basically was the centrist Republican neolib that got Dems a roadmap that they keep to this day.

The time for half measures is over and the DNC needs to adapt or they will end up like the Whig Party. If you dont believe me look at their approval right now, No one likes the Democrats

Newsom is an establishment figure and telling the next generation of voters this is going to be a candidate for change won't yield the results you think.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago (11 children)

With all due respect, as I understand where this sentiment comes from, that is how Trump gained momentum and won.

Trump gained momentum and won because the people in this country don't know their ass from their elbow in terms of what is happening, and their whole picture of politics is based on confusion and incredibly effective weaponized propaganda.

You presented a child with a pretty unappealing fast food burger that had gone cold anyway, and a big lump of shit laced with (and labeled as) rat poison, and then he selected the shit and ate the whole thing. And your reaction is, "Well the burger should have been better." I mean, it's not at all an incorrect statement. But I feel like the way it played out should be automatic proof that the burger quality wasn't the core of the issue.

[–] pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

I would say the citizens that experienced the fall out from NAFTA that gutted blue collar jobs and created the rust belt would say "the big lump of shit with rat poison" was the Democrats that threw the working class overboard years ago.

Speaking of poison, it is the same reason residents of Michigan would rather vote Trump because the Democratic party and Obama would rather gaslight them about their water being safe to drink instead of charging the corporations that cut costs that polluted the water with federal charges. Obama also bailed out Wall Street and left hard working Americans with a shell of an American dream.

The core of the issue is the Democrats use to be for the everyday man and they lost their way and eroded trust, that will never be gained back. What that leaves voters in fly over states with is a choice to vote their better interest or have a candidate that "tells it like it is" aka lie and get back at the party that screwed them over.

It's not as black and white when you're in the thick of it, as difficult as it is to reason with that base.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago (5 children)

First, criminalizing homelessness is fascism. If you can't take a stand for the homeless how can you expect anyone to take a stand for you? You thibk he won't throw you under the bus if it's politically expedient? Second, do you intend to repeat the same song and dance that got Trump elected twice? The definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results. Third, why are you compromising from now? Like come on it's still 2025, even if you're going to vote blue no matter who, now you should be projecting strength not compliance.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Neoliberals Don't oppose fascists.

He will work with the fascist to come up with a compromise that the fascists can live with. That probably means sacrificing vulnerable groups and rallying around right wing talking points.

He is right wing. Gavin newsom is just right wing. the fact that there's a uneven deeper more belligerent right wing out there doesn't mean that he is somehow an alternative to it.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago (16 children)

This attitude is how you ended up electing Trump.

Its bonkers that you guys are spiralling into a dystopian shitscape day by day and just cant bring yourself to acknowledge that any alternative has to be better.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

This is how I feel. I can’t stand neoliberals but some people on here are delusional for saying they won’t vote for Newsom if he is nominated.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Leftists: "Democratic politicians are feckless. They need to get on social media to call out Trump's bullshit on daily basis! When is a leader going to step up?!"

Somewhere, a finger curls on a monkey's paw.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (20 children)

You Americans don’t learn, constantly punching left, nobody is good enough to be an ally. While the right is unified and eating your lunch

This is true to an extent, but when you look at the history of the moral majority (new right movement) and what actually unified the right, it should give you some context about how the Dems aren't really doing themselves any favors by distancing themselves from progressive values. The right were always willing to offer some concessions to what were once considered fringe voters (and now is essentially the base of the Republican party) in exchange for their vote.

I say this as someone who is almost always willing to vote blue no matter who, continuously catering to the wealthy and failing to follow through on promises is going to be the nail in the coffin for Democrats (and possibly American democracy in general). Midterms will probably be their last chance to get it right (if we're even allowed to vote) and they are definitely not off to a good start by giving the cold shoulder to Mamdani.

It's very hard to battle voter apathy and "both sides" disinformation when Democrats will not even acknowledge that much of what progressives are asking for is pretty reasonable. Establishment Dems seem to believe once they're accused of cultural marxism (which btw is a term that was popularized by the same people that created the moral majority/new right) they will lose centrists voters that might help them gain an edge over the competition. Meanwhile they seem to be oblivious to all the support on the left that they're absolutely hemorrhaging.

Some of that support is going to the right (and those are the people Gavin Newsome seemed really be worried about reaching with his podcast that "reached across the aisle" to some absolutely vile people), but a big chunk is being lost to people who just no longer see a point in bothering to vote for an establishment that seems to intentionally exclude and dismiss them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 3 days ago

Punching Newsom is punching up. Telling voters they are wrong to criticize him in regards to economics, Zionism, LQBTQ rights, and social safety nets IS punching left.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

Don't split. I don't like the guy much if I have better options, but anytime he's punching right I'm for him.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No fascism is better than fascism. Hopefully if he runs and wins he actually fixes the problems that led to fascism. He needs to tax the wealthy at 98%.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully if he runs and wins he actually fixes the problems that led to fascism

Neoliberals like himself are a huge cause of where we are right now.

He needs to tax the wealthy at 98%.

He will never do that, unless he has a sudden and complete change of heart.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago

He might not be a progressive but he's not a Russian cum rag, so speaking as a member of a (for the moment) allied country, he is lightyears ahead of your current guy.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 days ago

Nope he’s not. But he’s not as bad as trump.

[–] Fourth@mander.xyz 24 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Friend I don't give a fuck I just don't want to live in hell anymore. I'm going to be first in line slamming my fist on the table for a progressive but apparently we need to be at Gavin Newsom before we can ask for a progressive. Lemmy and Current Affairs isn't the average American. We suck. That's abundantly clear to me now. You know what? If Mandani or similar figure was running for president I'm all in. I'm all in on that no matter what. I'm in for the most progressive candidate at all times. Unfortunately right now I just need to not be under threat of everything completely falling apart and not being fixable. Maslow's hierarchy I need that first foundational level to build my pyramid on. I don't necessarily mean this to convince anyone, sometimes you just have to yell into the void because it all feels so bad.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

I don't give a shit. Anyone effectively getting under the skin of that demented pedophile should be encouraged to do so. Fuck these purity tests.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Ok, what’s the point of posting an article from 2 years ago?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He's rather brazenly pro-Israel. That is not a winning strategy for a Democratic candidate. Israel lost the public referendum, with something like a single-digit % of Democratic voters supporting the genocidal state. Time to accept this and move forward.

AIPAC and none of that shit matters if a significant segment of your voting base will outright reject you.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

He only looks good compared to the opposition.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

...you expect the dems to run a progressive?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I fully expect to see a repeat of 2020. The party establishment will be split between Elderly Nepo-Ghoul With Fanatical Partisan Following and Young Pretty Boy Who Says Progressive Things To A Room Of Millennial Age Investment Bankers.

On the edge of the debate, you'll see a few genuinely progressive leftist voices saying things like "We should be against genocide" and "Homelessness is easily solveable if we put forward even the least amount of political capital" and "Granting DC statehood is the most obviously smart and moral Act any future Congress can pass". Maybe even a few "Medicare 4 All is still a good idea" die-hards shouting from the extremely cheap seats.

And then one (or both) of the insider candidates will pick up a few of the more popular slogans as their own. This, while denouncing any of the fringe voices as Anti-White Racists, Politically Toxic Far-Left Anti-Capitalists, Eco-Terrorists, and Fat Ugly Unfuckable Losers.

Come primary day, said fringe leftists will do shockingly well in some of the early states. At this point, the centrist candidates will panic, drop the kabuki of intra-party squabbling, align behind whomever the current Party Elder tells them to select, scream that a vote for Fringe Candidate is a vote for Fascism, blanket the airwaves with a deafening smear campaign, disavow every nice thing they said up until this point, and maybe squeak in to the convention by a few points on a technicality about who gets to be Superdelegates.

The Convention will be a coronation of a rotten corporate homunculus. Any leftist disgusted by the process or the annointed candidate will be denounced as a Far-Right Foreign Plant designed to undermine the fundamental principles of democracy itself. Said rotten homunculus will pick a Token Minority/Progressive as their running mate, then immediately dump that person to the sidelines and campaign exclusively with the reanimated corpse of Rush Limbaugh.

Trump wins by a ten point margin in 2028. Leftists are blamed for the loss. Democrats vow to purge their party of anything resembling progressive values or human decency even harder. By 2032, they're running a Bitcoin Billionaire in an uncontested primary, because it's unreasonable to trust an election process that's been infiltrated by Hamas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

OH boy I sure do love purity checks. It's worked out so great for us in the past.

Why is this shit always all or nothing, goddamn. It works for maga because they have no nuance and it's all groupthink, but the rest of the nation is far more complex and won't just go for a hard left progressive in the same way. It needs to happen but it won't happen in a single election.

I am in no way endorsing newsome, but at least he's doing LITERALLY ANYTHING.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago

Maybe he's not a progressive, but it's great to finally see a prominent Democrat loudly opposing Trump. Too many are obsessed with undermining their own party while letting the US go to hell.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 11 points 3 days ago

Hopefully, the Democratic Party will go the way of the Whigs, and take Newsom with them. I want a genuinely good party whose mission is to overhaul America in all ways. UBI, a renewed Constitution, universal healthcare, the extinction of ICE and border patrol with minimized police, ect.

The America we have is a sick creature, that cannot be saved by Geronocrats.

[–] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›