this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
453 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

75186 readers
2116 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 114 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

WG was always so much better anyway.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 44 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Well it was written to replace open VPN right? So that makes sense

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 weeks ago

Don't let openvpn get a swelled head. Itself it was just a Bender project ("I'm gonna write vtun better; with hookers and beer!") anyway.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 84 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Urgh, I don't really have time to do this migration but guess I'm planning it in anyway.

Past me was a lazy bum. But I'm confident that future me is all over this. Time for a nap.

[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 31 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Damn you sir, you didn't need to call me out with that last paragraph.

No, I know it wasn't my shoe, but look at how well it fits!

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

mullvad and windscribe are the only two i support <3

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you have a stance on IVPN?

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ve had an active iVPN sub for almost 8 years now. Cannot say anything bad about them whatsoever

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

recently switched from mullvad to ivpn, and the servers are noticeably slower. with mullvad all the servers I used achieved my connections max speed 500 mb/s but on ivpn they usually do 50 - 300, and sometimes i need to switch server because they go down (i use european servers). only reason i switched was because mullvad causes a wakelock on mint cinnamon and it drives me nuts.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is that a Mint Cinnamon issue primarily?

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

it hasn't happened on other distros but i have other bigger issues on them so i never could test for a longer period. took me a year to find what caused it and it hasn't happened since i switched from mullvad. fun bonus: ovpn destroyed my nvidia drivers on mint...

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I started on mint years ago and it was an okay foot in the door, but would not recommend to anyone (including beginners). Fedora is my goto for new users these days. I use arch (btw) and have had much more luck on rolling release.

Not gonna try to convince you off Mint, but it does sound like you're having issues with it.

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago

I've been itching to install ultramarine but earlier I've had bad times with fedora on my hw. also because i host jellyfin at my home network, i kinda need x11 because i have a little program that keeps my system awake when network traffic crosses a certain threshold, using xdotool. and no, that's not the cause for the wakelock issue. i know ydotool but no time to get into it in the near future

[–] Scavenger8294@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 4 weeks ago

And justified paranoia

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 points 4 weeks ago

Pira... I mean, Privacy

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A bit annoying for all the things that don't support openvpn, like old Synology NAS devices.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Oh that's interesting, though my model isn't on the list ;(

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Bummer. For whatever reason I always get much better speeds on openvpn servers.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 46 points 4 weeks ago

That's not something you hear very often.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 4 weeks ago

That’s very strange. WireGuard was specifically created in part because of speed limitations.

[–] Kyle@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Only the opposite has ever happened for me.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

Oh I know it's odd. I think it must be something with my router or windows configuration, but it's very noticeably different between the two.

[–] drath@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

This post makes it look like there's something serious ly wrong with openvpn, but it's just them not wanting to deal with it and deprecating it.

Oh well, guess Ill put a note not to use them. My country blocks VPN protocols and wg specifically, so for my usecase I need as many protocols supported as possible, preferrably mimicking other innocuous protocols.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

Good! That shit needs to be phased out.