JustARaccoon

Why not both?

The first change doesn't seem to be related, but that second link is promising.

I know that makes sense to do, but that's different from them making plans to do it

What makes you think Labour are looking to change that?

I'd say no, you can develop an allergic reaction to many things, doesn't mean we should ban it all because of that or because it's upsetting to some people. As for "upsetting" I think it's everyone's freedom to perfume however they want, if it's something socially concerning like idk, smell of puke, then feel free to raise an eyebrow at their choice and vacate the premises (if possible, if it's on a plane then yeah might need to get them to cover it up), but just because it's generally unacceptable to use that as an aroma doesn't mean it should be banned still, unless it directly causes death. Banning something should be a last resort.

Ai models should contain a database of all the data it was trained on, where it came from, and through what license did it get perms to train on it. That way you don't get the issue of comparing outputs to real life work, because the issue isn't with the output, it's with the use of the data in the first place without permission to train the AI model, and no it's not similar to humans learning. The scale and accuracy of reproduction from a software is so much higher than a human that it's not even a comparison, before we get to what it means to allow humans to grow as people by enriching themselves Vs what it means for a corporate owned churner.

Hmm I'm not sure using gacha games which are designed for addictive gameplay loops and predatory monetisation being the games that your kid prefers over standalone experiences is a good argument to make

I wish they had a more dual sense-y ps-style controller, the closest they have is a retro looking one..

Without html?

In a position relative parent

But how are you going to specify a monospace font?

Doesn't matter how ineffective it might seem, that drink is getting thrown away