this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
269 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74565 readers
4588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 121 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

A small data center has been estimated to use upwards of 25 million liters of water per year if it relies on old-school cooling methods that allow water to evaporate.

So pass a law banning evaporative cooling systems from all industrial and commercial applications (or single out data centers), give them 6 months to comply and start handing out fines every day past the deadline.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 26 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

straight up not feasible for many serious and necessary facilities like powerplants and refineries, unless you prefer very warm lake or river nearby (which also cools down by evaporation later)

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

straight up not feasible

It's very feasible to create the law, collect the fine, and raise the price on energy sources or industrial process that require the cooling.

It's a formality, you could do it in an afternoon. Costs a bit of ink and a piece of paper.

"But then it gets more expensive!" and "This might push corporations out of the city/country." is the consequence the people / the government / the country have to have the balls to endure, if they want to stand by things like "having enough water" or "living on earth in the 22nd century".

If the free market is something you believe in, you should love this, because it makes water a more scarce resource and the market will be able to find another optimal solution to that new scarcity problem.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Which is why I mentioned limiting it to data centers as an option

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They could heat many houses or fill many heat reservoirs instead.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Depending on local climate, season and proximity to cities or industrial customers, this is often done, but you'll still have to dump lots of heat in the summer when space heating is off

[–] legion02@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

You know what you're right. It's too hard. I think running out of water is maybe the better option.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

More heat reservoirs.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

cool. and watch the entire right wing go mad over “net zero wokery” and “stealth taxes choking our economy to death.” then watch reform win with a landslide and bulldoze the entire net zero agenda and see where we end up.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The right will always complain no matter what you do, so why bother listening to them and capitulating?

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

sensibly managing the economy and balancing the need to achieve reduced emissions with the need to maintain a functional economy is not capitulating, and indeed being seen to carefully maintain that balance might be key to election victory in four years time.

[–] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

They aren't going to win anyway. I'd be shocked if Labour somehow wins.

Does the Labour base voter even like Labour at this point?

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

"If we try to make the world a better place, the conservatives will use that as a pretext to do what they're already doing"

There was an onion article about almost exactly that lol. https://theonion.com/protesters-urged-not-to-give-trump-administration-pretext-for-what-it-already-doing/

They're already saying our plan to tackle climate change is going to hurt the economy. But we know that doing nothing will hurt the economy worse. Being scared of them saying what they're already saying is weak and cowardly. Toughen up and do the right thing.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 72 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The country is riddled with leaky mains pipes because water companies are more concerned with allocating huge bonuses to themselves than they are with fixing infrastructure.

Now we're courting tech companies to build more data centres that our other shitty infrastructure (electric) isn't even fit to support because magic money tree go brrrrrrr

This is mandated recycling 2.0. Fill supermarkets with products 99% of which come in plastic wrappers, only successfully recover a fraction of that, and then tell the consumer they're the ones destroying the environment.

If they can fit my 5 recycling boxes up their rear, then they can shove this up their arse too.

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I suggest spitting to lose weight

[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nice analogy. I used this one in the past: "you can't fix a full disk by deleting word documents", but I like yours more

[–] ladfrombrad@lemdro.id 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Always used to amaze me as a kid I had to pay 20p to inflate my bike tyre from, air.

Boggled my mind since I had a hand pump.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, those automated air pumps require upkeep (e.g. compressors fail after awhile and aren't always super cheap to replace when factoring the cost of the part and labor to fix). So that's what your money was paying for, not the air itself. But, I agree it is a bit ridiculous.

As a side note, I highly recommend those portable air compressors that can plug into your car's aux port. Super convenient in the winter time when your tires' air pressure drops.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how is this applicable?

If you have storage for documents, they will fill it up and you have to remove them.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One shitpost meme video in your downloads folder = hundreds of Word docx files. Pick the low hanging fruit.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you put meme videos on production storage, then the hanging fruit is you

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 54 points 2 weeks ago

I never heard so much bs in a single article. Those files and emails are stored on cold storage, and is using zero water. I guess it's a good thing to remove old files and empty your trash bin, both in real life as well as digital.

But this article makes no sense at all. Just one query to an AI will use so much more energy and water in comparison with your old email in cold storage. It's a joke.

Ps. By removing your files now, and checking the contents, you are actually moving the files from cold storage to hot. Meaning the server will load the data into memory etc. Which will actually makes this drought worse, not better.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How about deleting private ownership of utilities instead?

[–] Sagan_Wept@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I tried deleting my files but I was age checked...

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

Fk UK government

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I hope the Department that released this guidance is being absolutely pilloried in UK media. What an absolutely worthless, dishonest pile of crap.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Authoritarian and incompetent.

Just like all the other Fascists.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think I will. In fact, I think I'll download more.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'll also wear blue clothing to have the same impact

Well, deleting stuff causes a load of processing that wouldn't have otherwise happened... So I guess I should have some coal barbecues?

[–] tane69@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Absolute farce of a country

[–] hisao@ani.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So where does this water go after evaporating or leaking from your toilet? Is it flying into deep space and being lost for our planet forever?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Raining over the ocean where it is no longer in the stores of freshwater these systems are pulling from

[–] hisao@ani.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So this doesn't sound like a big deal after all. Maybe just stop pulling water from those "stores of freshwater" for cooling purposes and get your own from the ocean.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Corrosion issues, marine life clogging, too expensive, etcetc.

[–] hisao@ani.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, let them figure it out. It's their problem after all. If it's more expensive, then let them increase prices for their "data serving" activities. If it's too expensive for some people, they might reconsider their usage of said services which in turn might be equivalent of "deleting old files or emails". Instead of asking people deleting files right now before those in charge even tried to fix the problems they created.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ideally yes, but realistically, fuck the commoners, give money.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do I have to drink ocean water when they're the ones wasting it all?

[–] hisao@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lol, sorry, I meant that for them, not for you. Should have written 'maybe they should just stop pulling water from those “stores of freshwater” for cooling purposes and get their own from the ocean'.