this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
576 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

9169 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (95 children)

As an anarchist who is opposed to accelerationionism, it's frustrating how many people see it as an ideology that wants the state to immediately collapse.

I've had multiple arguments with liberals who say I'm not a real anarchist because I want pragmatic short-term progressive solutions like Medicare for all.

So yeah, I'm not wanting to condemn people to death for my ideology. Got me! (Not you, PugJesus)

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I like to point people to Desert by Anonymous. It talks about how the plan should really be waiting for the State to recede as collapse progresses, and finding the spaces left behind where theres room for mutual aid based organization.

I like that. It turns your attention to what's in front of you, rather than waiting for the mythical Revolution we'll likely never see.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-desert

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’d much rather build systems that provide for people so we can all watch the old world crumble from a comfy chair with plenty of snacks.

Who am I kidding, I don’t want a society; people are too troublesome.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm of two minds about it. On the one hand I am tired of the unnecessary suffering that is common in the richest country in the history of the Earth. A step in the right direction is better than nothing.

Or is it? Every time we increase the social safety net, our righteous anger subsides. We stop boycotting, protesting, striking, organizing, etc, because faith in the system is restored. And then we delay the necessary work of dismantling this system that is based on greed and exploitation. Inevitably, the oligarchs bide their time and then strip away rights and economic opportunity as soon as we stop paying attention.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Things getting worse will make people swap to MY side!" has a terrible track record.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sure, but this doesn't address the problem I'm noting above. We fought hard for worker's rights, so they granted them and then dismantled/neutered the unions. Public outcry forced the fracture of Standard Oil and now the monopolies are worse than ever. It's one step forward and two steps back.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (92 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some ideologies want to be the boot pressing down on other’s necks and set the world on fire.

The rest aren’t so bad compared to that.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I like this comment.

As much as I crap on certain leftists, they still have the ideology "I wish people were slightly more kinder" and I would love their ideology to be accepted common sense rather than current one.

I would be just as happier if they were considered the new "centrists." And current right-wing considered far, far extreme.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

would love their ideology to be accepted common sense rather than current one

The crazy thing is that the current economic system we utilize isn't considered nonsensical.

I guess an economic system that requires infinite growth made a bit more sense during the age of discovery, when people were actively finding new continents to exploit. One would think that now we've definitively concluded we inhabit a closed system with a finite amount of natural resources, maybe just maybe we could evolve our economic system to reflect that?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

My favorite part is this is exactly what the dems are doing with Trump, their startegy since the beginning was not to stop Trump and just wait for him to ruin the country enough that people vote for them again. They were saying as much earlier in the year too. Hilarious to see how they called all their detractors accelerationist before deciding to join in.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Stupidity knows no ideological borders, it would seem

collapsed inline media

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

no? literally no leftists side with maga (except for maga communism, but that's fringe).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

They are all using public transport. Already a win.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t know what’s coming after this; better, worse, another version of the same.

I’m just tired of waiting for the other shoe to drop.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My money is on worse. The billionaire class has the means to take full control if society were to collapse and form it in their interest.

Even if a specific currency became meaningless, they'd still have wealth to transfer to whatever currency isn't.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

Oh and to follow on my last comment, I know there's going to be widespread bloodshed. I'm not blind to that; neither do I welcome it. I know it because gestures widely at human history.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

If post-apocalyptic media has taught us anything, it's that the same systems will rise again, only now they are even more warped and fucked up than they were before the apocalypse.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Many of those people will not have developed political reasoning, and will consider themselves "apolitical" due to having never investigated their own political viewpoints...

Or worse, they'll consider themselves "objective" when it comes to politics, claiming they just know when something is true, or good for people.

[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Let me dream god damn it, its the closest I have for a hope for a better future

"We can still improv...."

No....

No shut up

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My ideology is leaving each other the hell alone.

[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

What if the 'other' is building a nuke? What if they refuse to vaccinate and are a notch away from creating a new superbug that will likely kill you? What if they're pumping pollution into the air and water and maximizing climate change? What if they're raping and violently torturing children?

What if you need them to maintain your food supply, electricity, medical care, etc? What if you need the local 'other' to back you up if another more distant 'other' decides it going to kill you and take your land?

I say this as a heavily individualist minded person myself: You can't operate a worthwhile society as a collection of islands. You need cooperation.

It would be better to eradicate spacetime itself with a vacuum decay event than to allow a completely brutal "every man for themselves" world to continue existing. Pointless suffering.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Once, I nihilistically mentioned to my friend that “I welcome the coming inevitable nuclear holocaust.” His reply was something that I will never forget: “I don’t think you realize what nuclear war entails.”

I haven’t wished for the end of the world since.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if I want the death of all humans... /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›