this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
378 points (99.7% liked)

News

31560 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The National Weather Service has received permission to hire 450 meteorologists, hydrologists and radar technicians just months after being hit hard by Department of Government Efficiency-related cuts and early retirement incentives.

The new hiring number includes 126 new positions that were previously approved and will apply to “front-line mission critical” personnel, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration official told CNN.

The NWS cuts have spurred concerns over how well-prepared the country is to withstand hurricane season, which is just starting to heat up in the Atlantic. The staff reductions also have been scrutinized in the wake of the deadly Texas floods in July, with vacancies at weather service forecast offices there.

The cuts to probationary employees, as well as early retirement incentives, meant the nation’s front-line weather forecasting agency’s staffing levels fell by more than 550 people since the second Trump administration began, to below 4,000 total employees.

CNN has reached out to NOAA for comment.

Agency employees are greeting the news, unveiled at an all hands meeting on Monday, with guarded optimism and relief. Current employees have been working additional hours with additional responsibilities since the layoffs and retirements earlier this year, trying to maintain the 24/7 posture US extreme weather requires. The agency has also been functioning with less data from fewer, less frequent weather balloon launches.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 135 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

fire 550 experienced employees, hire 450 new grads after expensive lawsuits

doesn't seem very, uh, efficient to me

“How much time/money is it going to cost to train a bunch of new people when we had already-trained people in place?” asked another NOAA official, who requested anonymity

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

“In fact, severely-reduced pay all around!”

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but now they can hire only Trump supporters to make sure the "science" meets the White House's ideological standards.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

“They’re not rehiring their best people…”

Meet the new head of the NWS: Jack "Large Nuts" McGill.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's efficient when the actual intent is to replace everyone with sycophants.

And incompetents. Graduates of Bastyr College's School of Holistic Meteorology, Zodiac Climate Science, and Organic Astrology.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If they're all GS positions, the hiring process will take forever and has the lovely new trump loyalty bullshit baked in as a shit cherry on top.

[–] FlashyWierz@ttrpg.network 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, thats the part the news outlets seem to forget. The hiring paradigms this time around favor cronyism and nepotism over actual merit and skill, and direct hire just augments that 10 fold

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Its not that it favors it; its literally an essay question as part of the application process now.

https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/06/lynch-opms-hiring-plan-includes-blatant-loyalty-test/405740/

"How would you help advance the president’s executive orders and policy priorities in this role?” asks one of four essay questions that job seekers must answer if they are seeking any federal position GS-5 or above. “Identify one or two relevant executive orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.”

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's the fucking weather service. They can't advance any of his fucking orders. All they can do is follow them, as dumb as they are.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

They can say the weather is caused by sunspots or windmills or Mexicans or Jewish space lasers or some dumb shit

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

Surely they could…lie?

[–] FlashyWierz@ttrpg.network 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's not just the essay questions or the loyalty tests. Whether or not you are hired, and whether or not you get to keep your job is wholesale based on if a Trump Admin stooge thinks you pass the admins vibe check.

And, if you don't pass the vibe check for your probation you get an adverse action on your personnel file which basically precludes you from working in the civil service again. (Page 7)

It's shit all the way down ngl, and the civil service will take decades to recover from all this.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember when Elon Musk was saving so much money?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

No one does

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

“How did you vote in the last election?”

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone -2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As 2/3 of Americans effectively voted for Trump, it seems that they must be quite pleased with the result.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

2/3 of Americans effectively voted for Trump

Effectively is doing some serious lifting there. But non-voters deserve it.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Of 264.8 million voting age Americans only 77.3 million Trump voters - so less than a 3rd of eligible voters voted for him.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 7 points 6 days ago

If you didn’t vote you effectively voted for the winner as it is only by voting that you can say that you didn’t vote for him.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Next year they'll fire over half of them again just to show costs are being cut. And perhaps someone will yell "we hired them back to improve the climate, look what it got us".

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Time to nogotiate good salaries. They must be desparate.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No they probably only hire climate change deniers

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That might be a real issue, yes.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That's not really a thing with federal jobs. They all have pay caps, and the top cap for the highest GS role is something like 191k. Sounds like a lot, but it's well below what industry will pay for similar high-level experience and skills.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

thats pretty much reason why people dont go for govt jobs, shit pay. im betting meteorologists, at a channel station pays more.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

And for HCOL areas, it's not a lot at all. More than enough to pay bills, sure, but you're not buying even one yacht on that.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 5 days ago

Ah, the famed efficiency of business and capitalism.

/s

Interviewer: Can you tell me what we do here exactly?